FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2005, 12:44 PM   #311
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon
My summary: Doherty shamelessly misrepresents the 2nd century apologists. There is no reason to believe that any 2nd century apologist didn't believe in a historical Jesus.
I think there is a case that Doherty represents to his readers that the writers of the second century either do not believe that Jesus was a historical person or if they do, consider it unimportant, as I have seen a good many people who have read and agreed with his book understood him thus.

But if we simply step back, open up the definitely second century Christian writers (10 of them), and search for words such as 'Jesus', 'Christ', and see what they say, we find that 6 of them explicitly state their belief in Jesus as both God and man. Two more refer to the gospels, while two do not discuss the issue.

Those who wish to see those citations may do so at a page I wrote a few years ago on the incarnation in the second century fathers.

I am unclear, then, how Doherty's book can be said to accurately represent what those writers actually say, which I think is what Don was saying.

Incidentally Doherty refers at some length to a phrase in Minucius Felix, but I understand that the recent HLL * tells us that modern scholars consider the question of the priority of the Apologeticum solved, and that Minucius must therefore have been written between 210-245. This was published in 1997, two years before Doherty: but I understand from Michael Sage's monograph on Cyprian (extract) that this was resolved around 1975, on philological grounds.** Once Minucius is understood to be a third century figure, contemporary with Tertullian and Cyprian, I think it becomes impossible to understand that isolated half-sentence in the manner Doherty would like.

All the best,

Roger Pearse

* Heck, E., M. Minucius Felix. In: HLL (Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike) 4, München 1997, § 485, p. 512, as given by Petr Kitzler in his article on Czech scholarship on Tertullian

** Of course it would be unfair to expect Doherty to be familiar with all the scholarship in this large field, but it highlights the risk he took in extending his book into the second century.
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 08-09-2005, 10:38 PM   #312
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon
Well, my essay on Doherty and the Second Century apologists is all but completed. I hope to have it up on my website sometime this weekend. I'll post a link when it is up for anyone who is interested in looking at it.

My summary: Doherty shamelessly misrepresents the 2nd century apologists. There is no reason to believe that any 2nd century apologist didn't believe in a historical Jesus.
Doherty has provided a thorough rebuttal to GDon's article .
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 08-11-2005, 06:26 AM   #313
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman
Doherty has provided a thorough rebuttal to GDon's article .
Thanks, Ted. I'll add the link to my article, so that people can see both sides.
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 08-11-2005, 10:36 AM   #314
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon
Thanks, Ted. I'll add the link to my article, so that people can see both sides.
You do that. We'll have to get Chris Price to do the same. I will comment on your article later.
TH.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.