FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-19-2009, 07:02 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post

...or the god making the empty threat is not the real god, but an impostor. Don't underestimate what 1000 years of theology can come up with.
Well, I think I would expect to see better evidence if God was supposed to be an impostor.
Although I don't totally buy it, there is an author (forgotten who) who promotes the idea that there are 2 gods in the garden, the real god, and an impostor. The real god is always referred to just as 'god', and the impostor is referred to as 'lord god'. He claims there are numerous plays on words in Hebrew that would make it obvious to someone reading in that language.
spamandham is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 07:05 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post
Is this is serious conundrum?
Adam lived 930 years.
Fundamentalist teaching INSISTS the “in the day” is metaphorical, but the 930 years are literal!
“…for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.”
It doesn’t say “metaphorically”, “allegorically” or “spiritually”.
Read as it stands, it is Jehovah telling Adam a lie, or using sophism in dealing with extremely serious matters [for the future of humankind].
If it was to mean "spiritually", it should have been stated clearly, without the need for "interpretation"!
Eve was NOT included in the curse, please note.
Genesis 2:16-17.
PS: What possible concept of death could Adam have at that point?
I don’t know what “day” may have meant in the olden days, but when Jesus was alive “day” meant 24 hours.

The birth and life of Jesus changed many things for many people and the grunting of cavemen harking back to the prehistoric past cannot change that which remains alive in the hopes and achievements of those who create and modify on this earth.
Iskander is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 07:14 AM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
It is also possible that he deserved to die but God had mercy and sacrificed animals (Gen 3:21) as a substitution
That is a possibility, but that is not what it says. According to the story, God did not say to Adam "You will deserve death." According to the story, God said to Adam "You will die."
It takes a special aptitude for boneheaded literal-mindedness not to recognise that the author of the story intended God's words to be true. So if they aren't true in the most literal-minded sense then the author must have intended something less literal-minded.

Peter.
Petergdi is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 07:57 AM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post

So, you reckon "in the day" it was to be understood by an innocent man to mean "after a while"?...
Why would a nice god not tell the crystal-clear truth upfront? Why wait for professional interpreters to arrive in the scene to help Jehovah communicate the message?
And since Jehovah doesn't threaten Eve, why punish her, too?
More holes to cover!...
A lot of incongruities in myths I take as sort of normal and expected. If it is a strange repeating pattern, then a good explanation is needed. If it is just an instance of something not quite making sense, then probably the best explanation is that the story-tellers didn't put so much thought into it, and the listeners weren't nearly the critical thinkers that you are.
Yes, good point.
Julio is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 08:53 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Well, I think I would expect to see better evidence if God was supposed to be an impostor.
Although I don't totally buy it, there is an author (forgotten who) who promotes the idea that there are 2 gods in the garden, the real god, and an impostor. The real god is always referred to just as 'god', and the impostor is referred to as 'lord god'. He claims there are numerous plays on words in Hebrew that would make it obvious to someone reading in that language.
God is Gen 1 who creates the essence of all existence (even today) and Lord God is the manifestation of this creation with a mind of his own (even today) and in Gen 3 'like god' is added to be co-creator with the God of Gen.1 (even today) and there is totally no creation in Gen 2. nor is there any creation in Gen.1 without the input of Gen.3 (even today) . . . which then is why all of creation is sentient so it can compete in a living environment = ends the evolution debate.

It therefore says ìn the beginning to show the state of mind wherein only we can be at rest instead of war in this ever changing biological environment werein we also are no longer social beingss but solitary individuals as such.
Chili is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 09:38 AM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post
Is this is serious conundrum?
Adam lived 930 years.
Fundamentalist teaching INSISTS the “in the day” is metaphorical, but the 930 years are literal!
“…for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.”
It doesn’t say “metaphorically”, “allegorically” or “spiritually”.
Read as it stands, it is Jehovah telling Adam a lie, or using sophism in dealing with extremely serious matters [for the future of humankind].
If it was to mean "spiritually", it should have been stated clearly, without the need for "interpretation"!
Eve was NOT included in the curse, please note.
Genesis 2:16-17.
PS: What possible concept of death could Adam have at that point?
That Adam lived for 930 years only means that he could trace is own lineage back 930 years after illumination (much like Joseph in Luke).

The day can also be read as the moment because to eat of the Tree of Knowledge (TOK) is to be consciously aware which is needed to know that you will die . . . and that does not mean that you will not die if one is not consciously aware that you will die.

To be aware we need an ego or self conscious mind and thus in Gen 3 the persona is created by conjecture to serve man with the gather of food, beauty and truth that is to be retained by the woman who presides over the subconscious mind there called the Tree of Life (TOL).

Notice how God knows and God said but God never does anything while Lord God is what he is and `like god`(small g) is the achiever but not in Eden where all his goodies are retained. His in this context is masculine or human and thus the TOL is woman as the womb of God. This is how human and woman are opposites and subsequently also temproal and eternal (respectively) and thus it is in woman or in his own TOL where Adam was 930 years old. In the NT they call this the reign of God etc.
Chili is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 09:49 AM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Dear Chili, with the due respect, who told you all that?!...
Julio is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 09:51 AM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

To recognize in the above is that the fall of man happened to Man [in the image of God] and not to Adam which is the name given to this second naure of Man = wherein only the shame complex can be conceived to exist (cf Gen2:25 and Gen 3:7) realizing that we look with our eyes but see with our mind.

So Adam is the usurper and therefore god (small g) for which later an insurrectionist is needed to undo this event and so restore Eden as heaven on earth.
Chili is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 09:53 AM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post
Dear Chili, with the due respect, who told you all that?!...
Huh? that's just the beginning
Chili is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 10:41 AM   #20
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 5,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julio View Post
Dear Chili, with the due respect, who told you all that?!...
Huh? that's just the beginning
Of course, it's just the beginning. Who told you all that, I ask again?
Julio is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.