FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-29-2003, 02:41 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,751
Default

Quote:
So either an author is (1) attempting to pass off an illogical argument to a logical audience with technical logical terminology like "consequently" or (2) the author himself accepts a non sequitur as being "logical to him and his buddies" and so naturally uses such discourse in his diatribe.
Right. And the question is whether both options are intellectually culpable, so to speak, by the standards of Matthew's author's day. The first imputes insincerity, so it must be. I'm suggesting that the standards for competence in logic can be much lower than Russell's -- as low or lower than that evinced in Thucydides, still less the Platonic dialogues -- while still making (2) as culpable in its day as "... therefore, let's attack Iraq" is in ours.
Clutch is offline  
Old 09-29-2003, 02:58 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Clutch
Right. And the question is whether both options are intellectually culpable, so to speak, by the standards of Matthew's author's day. The first imputes insincerity, so it must be. I'm suggesting that the standards for competence in logic can be much lower than Russell's -- as low or lower than that evinced in Thucydides, still less the Platonic dialogues -- while still making (2) as culpable in its day as "... therefore, let's attack Iraq" is in ours.
I think we are in full agreement. There is a whole subculture that finds such a statement justified as "therefore we should attack Iraq" or "therefore those who blaspheme the Spirit won't be forgiven." They are called neocon Republicans. Back then they were Christians (and other shrill sectarians I suppose). But a guy such as Celsus or Lucian of Samosata could come along and say, "that's vulgar, that doesn't make sense, you believe by faith alone" and be right by the standards of many Greco-Roman intelligentsia. In fact, on Christianity in general, they did. Both Lucian and Celsus clearly indicate that Christianity was a blight of the ignorant.

"First, however, I must deal with the matter of Jesus, the so-called savior, who not long ago taught new doctrines and was thought to be a son of God. This savior, I shall attempt to show, deceived many and caused them to accept a form of belief harmful to the well-being of mankind. Taking its root in the lower classes, the religion continues to spread among the vulgar: nay, one can even say it spreads because of its vulgarity and the illiteracy of its adherents. And while there are a few moderate, reasonable, and intelligent people who interpret its beliefs allegorically, yet it thrives in its purer form among the ignorant."
-Celsus, True Discourse, c. 170 CE

"These deluded creatures, you see, have persuaded themselves that they are immortal and will live forever, which explains the contempt of death and willing self-sacrifice so common among them. It was impressed on them too by their lawgiver that from the moment they are converted, deny the gods of Greece, worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws, they are all brothers. They take his instructions completely on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods and hold them in common ownership. So any adroit, unscrupulous fellow, who knows the world, has only to get among these simple souls and his fortune is quickly made; he plays with them."
-Lucian, Passing of Peregrinus, c. 170 CE

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-29-2003, 05:22 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,751
Default

Peter, those are intriguing quotes. I'm surprised I haven't seen them before (or can't remember).

Thanks for a thoughtful exchange.
Clutch is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.