FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-12-2011, 04:05 PM   #21
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beallen041 View Post
Ehrman from Forged (or via: amazon.co.uk):

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart Ehrman
Ancient people also had a more nuanced sense of truth and falsehood; they too had stories that they accepted as “true” in some sense without thinking that they actually happened. Most scholars today recognize that the majority of educated people in ancient Greece and Rome did not literally believe that the myths about the gods had actually happened historically. They were stories intending to convey some kind of true understanding of the divine realm and humans’ relationship to it.
That quote was a surprise to me, but then I noticed the word, "educated," which makes a big difference. On page 19 of The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 3rd edition (or via: amazon.co.uk), Ehrman writes:
In the early Christian world... Most people were uneducated and 90 percent could not read.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 07-12-2011, 04:06 PM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: S. Nevada
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by beallen041 View Post
Ehrman from Forged:
That quote was a surprise to me, but then I noticed the word, "educated," which makes a big difference. On page 19 of The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 3rd edition (or via: amazon.co.uk), Ehrman writes:
In the early Christian world... Most people were uneducated and 90 percent could not read.
Yes, but it's quite clear that anyone who wrote the NT or commented on it could read.
beallen041 is offline  
Old 07-12-2011, 04:17 PM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beallen041 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
That quote was a surprise to me, but then I noticed the word, "educated," which makes a big difference. On page 19 of The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 3rd edition (or via: amazon.co.uk), Ehrman writes:
In the early Christian world... Most people were uneducated and 90 percent could not read.
Yes, but it's quite clear that anyone who wrote the NT or commented on it could read.
I agree with that.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 07-12-2011, 08:35 PM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bunbury, Western Australia
Posts: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beallen041 View Post
On page 19 of The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 3rd edition (or via: amazon.co.uk), Ehrman writes:
In the early Christian world... Most people were uneducated and 90 percent could not read.
I think it was the previous pope that said that 60% of the world's catholics were poor and illiterate. But this is not the case in America. Today, people go to school and supposedly get educated. But when it comes to fundamentalist religion, they are not educated, they are indoctrinated. As a result, rational thought is not an option.
bootsie is offline  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:15 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beallen041 View Post
Ehrman from Forged:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart Ehrman
Ancient people also had a more nuanced sense of truth and falsehood; they too had stories that they accepted as “true” in some sense without thinking that they actually happened. Most scholars today recognize that the majority of educated people in ancient Greece and Rome did not literally believe that the myths about the gods had actually happened historically. They were stories intending to convey some kind of true understanding of the divine realm and humans’ relationship to it.
You may have to distinguish different types of myth.

At one extreme we have something like the Trojan War which ancient educated people would have regarded as largely historical. At the other extreme we have Zeus castrating his father Kronos, which would have been regarded by educated people as some sort of allegory.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:16 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by beallen041 View Post
Ehrman from Forged:
You may have to distinguish different types of myth.

At one extreme we have something like the Trojan War which ancient educated people would have regarded as largely historical. At the other extreme we have Zeus castrating his father Kronos, which would have been regarded as some sort of allegory.

Andrew Criddle
So, which side does JC fall on?
dog-on is offline  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:24 PM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post

You may have to distinguish different types of myth.

At one extreme we have something like the Trojan War which ancient educated people would have regarded as largely historical. At the other extreme we have Zeus castrating his father Kronos, which would have been regarded as some sort of allegory.

Andrew Criddle
So, which side does JC fall on?
As an account set in recent times, involving real places and people (eg Pontius Pilate) an ancient educated person reading one of the Gospels would have probably regarded it as claiming to be basically true. It might have been regarded as distorted Christian propaganda but not IMO as basically allegorical in intent.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:54 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post

So, which side does JC fall on?
As an account set in recent times, involving real places and people (eg Pontius Pilate) an ancient educated person reading one of the Gospels would have probably regarded it as claiming to be basically true. It might have been regarded as distorted Christian propaganda but not IMO as basically allegorical in intent.

Andrew Criddle
So more of a Trojan War type of myth, as opposed to a Zeus cut off his daddy's balls type of myth.

I see.
dog-on is offline  
Old 07-13-2011, 02:20 PM   #29
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: S. Nevada
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog-on View Post

So, which side does JC fall on?
As an account set in recent times, involving real places and people (eg Pontius Pilate) an ancient educated person reading one of the Gospels would have probably regarded it as claiming to be basically true. It might have been regarded as distorted Christian propaganda but not IMO as basically allegorical in intent.

Andrew Criddle
So "The Golden Ass" would also be understood as propaganda and not basically allegorical in intent, given that it was also set in recent times and involved real places.
beallen041 is offline  
Old 07-13-2011, 02:28 PM   #30
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

It might have been a sort of Greek tragedy.
premjan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:15 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.