FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2008, 12:02 PM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robto View Post
I thought I had heard years ago that there was a match between the chemical fingerprint of the ink on some of the scrolls and the ink found at Qumran. This would seem to settle the matter - at least in terms of ruling out "nothing to do with each other." So, am I wrong, or has this evidence been overturned?
Ain't heard this one before and none of my Qumran texts seems to know about it.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-09-2008, 01:16 PM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I don't think that ink has a chemical fingerprint, in the CSI sense.

There is a reference here to the inkwells found at Qumran having a similar sort of ink to that used at Qumran, but this article is dated 1962.

There is a reference here to

'The Study of Ink Used at Qumran' presented with Yoram Nir-el at An International Congress The Dead Sea Scrolls - Fifty Years After Their Discovery: Major Issues and New Approaches in Jerusalem, July 20-25,1997.

This article states that there were only a few types of ink used at the time, so matching types would not show very much.

There is a long post here from Doudna on the inkwells found at Qumran.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.