FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-15-2008, 03:13 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
I am not interested in your beliefs, just facts and information.
No, you are not. Otherwise you would take into account the facts pointed out to you that nothing in the Greek text of Mt. 1:18 supports your claims about what Mt. 1:18 says.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 03:15 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Galatians and 1 & 2 Corinthians and 1 Thessalonians were created for Jews?
We by nature are Jews—Gal 2:15

And I became to the Jews, a Jew, that I might gain the Jews—1Cor 9:20

They are Hebrews: so am I. They are Israelites: so am I. They are the seed of Abraham: so am I.—2Cor 11:22

For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea—1Thes 2:14
No Robots is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 03:33 PM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

I am dealing directly with the OP.

The poster has been responding to my questions about the OP.

The poster claim to accept the NT as historical, so I have asked the poster to identify the passage in the NT where there is an historical account of Jesus as a Jew.

GMatthew and gLuke contain accounts of the conception and the birth of Jesus which are pertinent and directly related to the OP.

The parentage and place of birth of real person is almost always related to nationality to some degree.

What part of the conception, birth, place of birth, and parentage, as described in the NT, does the poster of the OP accept as historical?
aa5874 is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 03:38 PM   #24
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There is an assumption here that the NT is historical, at least in part. That is not the question. Any more off topic posts will be split.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 03:40 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Galatians and 1 & 2 Corinthians and 1 Thessalonians were created for Jews
We by nature are Jews—Gal 2:15
This is, as Gal. 1:14 makes clear, a report of a speech that Paul gave to Cephas in Antioch. It says nothing about the ethnic identity of the Galatians to whom Paul addressed his epistle.

Quote:
And I became to the Jews, a Jew, that I might gain the Jews—1Cor 9:20
which is continued with a note from Paul about how he became like a Gentile in order to gain Gentiles.

Quote:
They are Hebrews: so am I. They are Israelites: so am I. They are the seed of Abraham: so am I.—2Cor 11:22
Which a boast made in response to the claims of the the "super apostles" who came into the Corinthian congregation preaching a gospel of circumscision.

None of these statements are about the recipients of Galatians and/or the Corinthian correspondence.

Quote:
For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea—1Thes 2:14
"are become"? In any case, to be a follower of the Churches of God does not mean that one was born and raised as a Jew. According to Paul, the members of the ekklessia at Thessalonika were ethnic Gentiles. Cf. his state,emt in 1 Thess 1:19 that the members of the community were those who had “turned to God from idols, to serve a living and true God” .

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 03:43 PM   #26
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post
Thanks, this is a good summary of the debate. There is also a good comment here from April DeConick:

Quote:
...

Whether Jesus was a Galilean or a Judean can be an interesting erudite discussion, but it means nothing in regard to whether or not Jesus was Jewish by our conventional definition of that term. Like his brothers and sister Jews who lived in the south, Jesus was a Torah-observant, Temple-oriented, apocalyptic teacher who felt very strongly that God's covenantal promises would be fulfilled in Israel. He kept Sabbath, celebrated the festivals, was kosher, and worshiped Yahweh.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 06:02 PM   #27
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
There are people who will argue that Jesus was not a "Jew" because there were no Jews by the modern definition at the time. But clearly the Jesus depicted in the gospels was part of the Judean society that evolved into modern rabbinical Judaism.

If you Google "Jesus was not a Jew" you find a lot of anti-Semitic and racialist crap. Hitler claimed that Jesus was not a Jew (see Race_of_Jesus) based on some of the thinking of German scholars, who theorized that Jesus was the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier. After the Holocaust, some Christians responded by emphasizing the Jewishness of Jesus. Others haven't gotten the message.

E.g. - Jesus was not a Jew (warning - bizarre racialist theories based on the Bible.)
Now, what made a person a Jew in the first century? Was it just being circumcised? Or was it related to ancestry,parentage or genealogy?

If, for the sake of argument, the NT is regarded as historical, it will be noticed that it is not known if the so-called Mary was a Jew.

Again, if for argument sake the NT is regarded as historical, then the father of Jesus is as gMatthew or gLuke described, the God of the Jews, or if gMatthew or Luke are rejected, then the father of Jesus is unknown.

From the NT, it cannot really be determined if Jesus was a Jew through genealogy, ancestry or parentage.

In the so called "Pauline" epistles, there are persons who were circumcised who were not described as Jews, therefore circumcision does not make a person a Jew.

Even if the NT is regarded as historical, there is actually no information to confirm that Jesus of the NT was a Jew.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 06:20 PM   #28
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Matt 1 contains a geneology of Jesus that attempts to link him to Jewish patriarchs. (Luke contains a different geneology.) Perhaps the geneology fails for Jesus, but it clearly establishes that Joseph was a Jew, so his betrothed, Mary, must also have been Jewish. Since Mary is Jewish, this makes Jesus Jewish.

Luke goes further, and states that Mary was a relative of Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, and the wife of the priest Zechariah. He then has Jesus circumcized and purified at the Temple.

No one seriously thinks that these passages are historical, but clearly the Jesus portrayed in the gospels is Jewish.
Toto is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 06:53 PM   #29
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Matt 1 contains a geneology of Jesus that attempts to link him to Jewish patriarchs. (Luke contains a different geneology.) Perhaps the geneology fails for Jesus, but it clearly establishes that Joseph was a Jew, so his betrothed, Mary, must also have been Jewish. Since Mary is Jewish, this makes Jesus Jewish.

Luke goes further, and states that Mary was a relative of Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist, and the wife of the priest Zechariah. He then has Jesus circumcized and purified at the Temple.

No one seriously thinks that these passages are historical, but clearly the Jesus portrayed in the gospels is Jewish.
If for argument sake the NT is regarded as historical, Joseph is not the father of Jesus of the NT.

And both genealogies found in the NT of Joseph cannot be historical.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 08-15-2008, 07:20 PM   #30
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

We're not talking about history here. We are talking about how the character in the gospels is portrayed. He is portrayed as Jewish.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.