Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-26-2009, 05:02 AM | #81 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Quote:
Myself I'm deeply, deeply tired of reading stuff that at bottom consists of someone barking like a dog, while the real question remains unresolved. When I see someone doing it, I don't really care who they are barking at. I just stop my ears to the godawful noise. I doubt I am alone. All the best, Roger Pearse |
|
10-26-2009, 05:29 AM | #82 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: South of Ontario
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
|
||
10-26-2009, 06:16 AM | #83 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
I hope you are not alone, otherwise my book (or via: amazon.co.uk) is going nowhere even though it has endorsements from Richard Carrier, Robert M. Price, Robert J. Miller, Gregory C, Jenks, John Loftus and Valerie Tarico (with hopefully more to follow as people find out about it). Despite all those endorsements, one of the reviews on Amazon.com that I was most proud to see was this one: "Komarnitsky, an admitted agnostic, presents his arguments in such a way that they should garner respect for one's position of uncertainty from both atheists and those of faith. I especially appreciate Kormarnistky's use of the term "plausible" to describe his conclusions. Many other writers could take a lesson from this approach and recognize that conclusions, especially those involving history-and even more so those involving the interplay between faith and history-can only represent degrees of plausibility, and often can only be expressed as being simply "more plausible than not" or vice versa!" Kris K. |
|
10-26-2009, 01:51 PM | #84 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
|
Quote:
|
|
10-26-2009, 02:15 PM | #85 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
I doubt too many people are reading this, but I'd be curious what other people think of my cover design. Since this thread started with a poll, maybe we can have a more light-hearted one! Anyone else got an opinion on my book cover? Kris K. |
||
10-26-2009, 02:31 PM | #86 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
|
Well heh. Off the top of my head, I'd use something like Grunewald's Crucifixion and Resurrection for their suitably dark backgrounds - as two 'faces' of your black box (in 3D isometric). Then top would be your name, followed by the title, below the box is your subtitle, and then below that in tiny letters because your wording is terrible (sorry), the "An inquiry..." bit. Colours... would use a brown, fairly stereotypical parchment kind of texture as the background, with perhaps some sort of glow seeming to come from the box (between the two panels of Jesus' death and resurrection). I could do it in Photoshop in about 15 mins but I'm too lazy to attempt it.
|
10-26-2009, 02:45 PM | #87 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Quote:
|
||
10-26-2009, 02:55 PM | #88 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
Kris K. |
|
10-26-2009, 03:07 PM | #89 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 140
|
Celsus,
Just in case. The whole thing would need to fit on a 6" x 9" cover with everything of substance being at least .25" away from any edge. Kris |
10-26-2009, 03:09 PM | #90 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 140
|
Actually, one other thing Celsus. PDF format is best, but I'm still begging not choosing!
Kris |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|