Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-05-2011, 08:46 AM | #241 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 400
|
Quote:
My prophecy is that it will cover no new ground, diss the JMers and just lead to more discussion here. |
|||
07-05-2011, 08:53 AM | #242 | |||||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
My prophecy is that it may shoot itself in the foot. From Forged Quote:
|
|||||
07-05-2011, 10:03 AM | #243 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 400
|
Quote:
|
|||
07-06-2011, 09:07 AM | #244 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 1,388
|
Quote:
|
||
07-06-2011, 09:09 AM | #245 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 1,388
|
Quote:
|
||
09-25-2011, 08:31 AM | #246 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: vienna
Posts: 74
|
Right question?
Is "Did Jesus exist?" even the best question to ask? If we find out for sure that there was a guy named Jesus who was born in Nazareth ca 0, does that even answer one useful question about christianity, given that the accounts of Jesus' teachings and deeds may still be 90% fictional?
|
09-25-2011, 08:54 AM | #247 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
If Jesus did exist some percentage of your questions may still be unanswered. Jesus of the NT, the Child of a Ghost, that was God and the Creator did NOT exist and did NOT say or do anything. And the people who say there was ANOTHER Jesus provide ZERO sources for the teachings and deeds of THEIR OTHER Jesus. But, in any event, perhaps the best question is "What is Ehrman talking about when he has ZERO sources for his OTHER Jesus"? |
|
09-25-2011, 02:32 PM | #248 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Southern United States
Posts: 149
|
Quote:
|
||
09-25-2011, 06:32 PM | #249 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Ehrman CASTIGATES William Craig for RELYING on the Gospels as historical sources and then uses the very same ADMITTED UNRELIABLE sources for HJ of Nazareth. Ehrman can't get any worse than that. |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|