FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2004, 04:08 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UA
Posts: 1,141
Default Disquieting poll

I'm not sure if this has already been posted (if it has, go ahead and delete this). But at www.pollingreport.com I came across a rather disquieting poll... actually made me outright sick at my stomach.

Quote:

ABC News PrimeTime Poll. Feb. 6-10, 2004. N=1,011 adults nationwide. MoE � 3. Fieldwork by ICR.

"I'm going to ask about a few stories in the Bible. [See below.] Do you think that's literally true, meaning it happened that way word-for-word; or do you think it's meant as a lesson, but not to be taken literally?"

Literally True, Not Literally True, No Opinion

"The story of Noah and the ark in which it rained for 40 days and nights, the entire world was flooded, and only Noah, his family and the animals on their ark survived."
60 33 7

"The creation story in which the world was created in six days."
61 30 8

"The story about Moses parting the Red Sea so the Jews could escape from Egypt."
64 28 8
I don't see how we could be _that_ far behind... I guess the forces of darkness are getting stronger. Actually, I just noticed that ICR did the fieldwork, so probably shouldn't take it too seriously, but definitely not something to take lightly.
Zephyrus is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 04:13 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
Default

It is always possible that some people just don�t want to say out loud, on TV, over the phone, or whatever, that they think the Bible is a crock.
Marduk is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 04:25 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
Default

That doesn't make sense, given a poll lower down this page .

Quote:
"Which of the following statements comes closest to describing your views about the Bible? The Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word. The Bible is the inspired word of God, but not everything in it should be taken literally. OR, The Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends, history, and moral precepts recorded by man."
Code:
Actual Word of God / Inspired / Fables / No Opinion 	 
  	  	% 	% 	% 	% 	 
  	12/02 	30 	52 	15 	3 	 
  	2/01 	27 	49 	20 	4 	 
  	6/98 	33 	47 	17 	3 	 
  	7-8/80 	40 	45 	10 	6 	 
  	8/76 	38 	45 	13 	5
You'd think the numbers would match up, but they don't.

IMO, I think most Americans don't think too deeply about why they're religious, it's just an assumed thing you do. It's those that actually think about it that either fundify or deconvert. And given that atheism/agnosticism and fundementalism are both low percentages, with all other inbetween, there's not a lot of thinking overall.

As an example, look at the numbers regarding church-state issues. The number of people who oppose some sort of koran/islamic display on public ground flip-flop if it's of christian origins. They don't understand the issue, they're just going with what they're familiar with. Sheeple.
Rhaedas is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 04:29 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,969
Default

I think it's simply a case of people not seriously thinking about what they believe. Think about it this way, if 60% of the people really believed in the flood narrative, and took the rest of the bible as literally (and why wouldn't they? The FN is the one of the most outlandish stories) then 60% of the people would be fundamentalist christians--I mean real bible thumping, gay hating, abortion clinic protesting fundamentalist christians.

If you believe in the flood narrative, and understand it in the context of the bible, you would spend an inordinate amount of time concerned for your soul. Most Americans (I'd say >75%) just aren't that vigorously religious.

So what is the explanation for the numbers? People heard the flood story as children. I heard it in my secular grade school in the 70's. There have been tv specials on it such as "IN Search Of" and others.
So when asked, 60% of the people "literally" believe a flood story, but probably better than 50% of those haven't even read it in its original form. They've just heard it by word of mouth, and accepted it, and incorporated it into their casual religion.

Mention to people at random that men and women have the same number of ribs. You'll be shocked to find out how many believe otherwise. They've just never actually examined the beliefs they very casually hold (mostly out of habit, IMO).

Ed
nermal is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 05:04 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: U.S.
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nermal
Mention to people at random that men and women have the same number of ribs. You'll be shocked to find out how many believe otherwise. They've just never actually examined the beliefs they very casually hold (mostly out of habit, IMO).


I remember a Sunday school teacher tell me and other young children that men and women have different numbers of rbis because of god's act of creating Eve from Adam.
Schopenhauer is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 06:55 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ...in a dark house somewhere in the world.
Posts: 3,598
Thumbs down IHT: "Majority of Americans believe Bible stories"

Ugh

Oh please have someone come out and say they only asked preschoolers.

Well, there's no hope. *strings up noose*
Space Chef is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 07:01 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
Default

{Link removed}

Being a preschooler isn't an excuse. A few years ago my now 8 year old figured out the problems with the Noah tale on his own. Of course, if you're a child in an environment where these tales are forced on you as the "gospel truth"....


Edit- Removed link to other thread since this is now part of it.
Rhaedas is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 07:19 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ...in a dark house somewhere in the world.
Posts: 3,598
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Schopenhauer


I remember a Sunday school teacher tell me and other young children that men and women have different numbers of rbis because of god's act of creating Eve from Adam.
I remember either having that taught to me or getting that impression.

I was actually kind of suprised when I read in THIS THREAD that men and women have the number of ribs. I remember recalling it a while ago, but I never got around to checking it out. Huh.
Space Chef is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 08:03 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Worshipping at Greyline's feet
Posts: 7,438
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Schopenhauer
I remember a Sunday school teacher tell me and other young children that men and women have different numbers of rbis because of god's act of creating Eve from Adam.
I remember being really confused about that, and thinking that the way the forensic scientists could tell if a skeleton was male or female was by counting the ribs.

And I wasn't raised with any religion!
Yahzi is offline  
Old 02-16-2004, 09:48 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Default

Quote:
ABC News PrimeTime Poll. Feb. 6-10, 2004. N=1,011 adults nationwide. MoE � 3. Fieldwork by ICR.
This wouldn't be the Institute for Creation Research, now would it?
Jobar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.