![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,310
|
![]()
Wisdumb.... A number doesn't say anything about the quality or the size of the apple, it is just (in this case) used to count how many, not how good the apples are.
And science is much more suitable to explain why things happen than a mytical wizard in the sky. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||||
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 214
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Issaquah, WA, USA
Posts: 90
|
![]()
Science isn't about finding "proof" or being absolutely correct. It is about finding the best representation of reality. So until we have 100% knowledge about everything, science will always be wrong at some level. On the other hand, science's ability to predict outcomes (and thus create items that rely on such predictions) is vastly superior to any other belief system in existance.
Should we break out Yahzi basebal bat of reality to prove our point? You can say that it is not really a baseball bat as it is not perfect and science can not know everything about it, but I will use science to predict that when I whack you on the knee, it will hurt. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 103
|
![]()
"Wisdumb.... A number doesn't say anything about the quality or the size of the apple, it is just (in this case) used to count how many, not how good the apples are."
I never said anything about size, shape, or how "good" the apple is, you obviously didn;t understand the point. The point is that no two apples or things in existence are 100% the same on a molecular level or any other level. Therefore, to add one apple plus one apple is impossible. You wont wind up with two apples, you'll just wind up with 2 different things that best symbolize our definition of apples. Its not perfect. No one ever said anything about a wizard in the sky. Only people who take things at surface level and dont read into them and try to find a deeper understanding believe that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,046
|
![]()
So are facetious and trichotillomania, which I prefer as words. They're far more interesting.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: US
Posts: 543
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The achingly beautiful San Fernando Valley
Posts: 2,206
|
![]() Quote:
If you have one red apple and 1 green apple, you have 2 apples. If you have one moldy worm-ridden apple and 1 pristine untouched apple, you have 2 apples. One plus one equals two, no matter what each one looks like. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central - New York
Posts: 4,108
|
![]() Quote:
Hello Magus55, :wave: on one level I agree with you ..... I am of the opinion / belief that all gods are only constructs / concepts of human minds ... I am willing to change that opinion if you can provide evidence (reasonable, objective not absolute) that the diety (god,godess singular or plural ) you believe in does not fall into that category. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|