Originally Posted by Bill Joey

I can't post the entire list so we shall start with 1-2.

Evidence #48

Oldest Copy of John's Gospel

In 1956 the world learned of the existence of a copy of the Gospel of John that had been penned in Greek on papyrus sometime between AD 150-200.

This early copy has proved invaluable to Bible scholars and translators for helping to reconstruct the most accurate Greek text possible of the Gopspel of John.

Originally Posted by Bill Joey

Evidence #28

The Jerusalem Temple of Jesus' Day (Herod's Temple)

In 1968 excavations commenced in the area of the south retaining wall of the temple mt in Jerusalem.

This work has uncovered much of this part of the temple as it was in Jesus's day. It is unknown which entrance to the temple Mt Jesus & his disciples used in Mk 11, Mt 211, & John 2,5. Lk 1:9 mentions the priests custom of burning incense when he went into the Temple of the Lord.

This discovered is significant in that it provides yet more archaeological evidence that the Bible is true.

My resource has photographs of many of these discoveries to validate the Bible. None of these are available on the web. these are just 50, but there are many books that provide far more archaeological discoveries with photos to validate the Bible.

Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic

One little fragment (P52) does not prove anything, especially since the Gospel of John if the latest Gospel.

No, secular history does not reasonably verify supernatural history. Many myths mention real people and places.

Originally Posted by Bill Joey

If the Bible is a myth and God does not exist how in the world did this earth get here?

Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic

Secular history does not reasonably verify supernatural history. Many myths mention real people and places.

Originally Posted by Bill Joey

If the Bible is a myth and God does not exist? How in the world did this earth get here? How did I get here?

Originally Posted by show_no_mercy

Maybe Islam is true.

Maybe Buddhism is true.

Maybe Hinduism is true.

Maybe Native American religions are true.

The only two options aren't "Christianity or atheism".

Originally Posted by Bill Joey

This is one of my favorite gospel tracts that I like to pass out to the lost regarding those religions.

But please this is OT. My last word on this issue.

http://www.fellowshiptractleague.org...iew_page_1.htm

Originally Posted by Emil

I disthink that you want to claim that if god exists, then theistic evolution is true. Theistic evolution is that God helped evolution create the diversity of life. If a god exists, then non-theistic evolution is still true and theistic evolution false.

Originally Posted by exchristian.net

Humans and chimps share an extensive collection of particular genetic markers. For example, our DNA shares with that of other primates a vast catalogue of genetic parasites--several million in number, comprising 50% of the human genome--that provide a consistent outline of primate evolutionary relationships. Remarkable studies using the 'Alu' genetic parasite as an evolutionary marker have been done by Salem A-H, Ray DA, Xing J et al
(2003). Alu elements and hominid phylogenetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 12787; Xing JC, Salem AH, Hedges DJ et al (2003). Comprehensive analysis of two Alu Yd subfamilies. J Mol Evol 57 Suppl 1, S76. The shared history to which such common markers testify establishes conclusively that human and chimp genomes have been copied from the same line of ancestors. It is a conclusion that we must live with. And when the details of the chimp genome are published with great fanfare in the scientific literature and the popular media, it is a conclusion for which we must give a Christian interpretation.

Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic

But I am an agnostic, not an atheist. In addition, billions of non-Christian theists and Deists already believe in intelligent design, but they reject the supernatural claims in the Bible.

I said "Secular history does not reasonably verify supernatural history. Many myths mention real people and places." That certainly is not a case against intelligent design.

Originally Posted by David B

Would you please stop sidetracking, and get back to my posts 2 and 5?

David B