Freethought & Rationalism Archive

drekoguk · 07-10-2008, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LampreyMoose

Your profile says one thing (atheist), while your excessive use of emoticons says another (creationist).

That atheist tag was the default setting.

Anyway, stop ignoring my evidence, it only makes you all look foolish because you can't counter my argument. I thought Darwinists were smart. :rolling:

Ezkerraldean · 07-10-2008, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drekoguk

evidence for Jesus Christ ........ evidence
supporting ID

aha! ID is religiously motivated.....

Quote:

fruit

ever seen wild bananas?
if wild bananas were knuckle duster - shaped, i might consider your point!

Quote:

Some actor eats a lizard he says
it tastes like chicken or some other actor has a
strange foreign meal and he says it tastes like
chicken! Now, what are the chances that all
these animals should taste like chicken?
Darwinists would say that all these animals
evolved to taste like chicken just by pure chance!

wha? that's it?
i've had crocodile, and i didn't think that tasted like chicken.

Quote:

You can’t keep relying on archaic 19th century
science

i think this applies to your "kind" more than anyone else's.

so, any actual evidence?

Zaphod Beeblebrox · 07-10-2008, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drekoguk

Quote:

Originally Posted by LampreyMoose

Your profile says one thing (atheist), while your excessive use of emoticons says another (creationist).

That atheist tag was the default setting.

Anyway, stop ignoring my evidence, it only makes you all look foolish because you can't counter my argument. I thought Darwinists were smart. :rolling:

We know you're not, if you continue in this charade.

drekoguk · 07-10-2008, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ezkerraldean

Quote:

Originally Posted by drekoguk

evidence for Jesus Christ ........ evidence
supporting ID

aha! ID is religiously motivated.....ever seen wild bananas?wha? that's it?
i've had crocodile, and i didn't think that tasted like chicken.

Quote:

You can’t keep relying on archaic 19th century
science

i think this applies to your "kind" more than anyone else's.

so, any actual evidence?

I presented it to you and you promptly ignored it. I guess my prediction came true which means I'm +1 on the "theory" of evolution which predicts absolutely nothing.

Porky Pine · 07-10-2008, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drekoguk

I don’t know why I’m doing this because you will
all deny this evidence like you deny the obvious
evidence for Jesus Christ

Nope. Evolution does not equal atheism. There are plenty of Christians who believe in evolution. Kenneth Miller for one.

Quote:

but I’m going to try to
open your minds anyway.

Glad your here to help us poor atheists.

Quote:

Much of the evidence
supporting ID involves fruit and vegetables and
I will present even more convincing and
overwhelming evidence involving chicken.

Oh-oh. Getting bad vibes here. Why do the words "Ray Comfort" "Kirk Cameron" and "Bananas" come to mind?

*Checks links*

Yup. The first one is Comfort's banana argument which he later regretted. the second one is just homeopathic mumbo-jumbo about the supposed similarities between some vegetables and some parts of the human body. not much to go on there.

Quote:

What do you hear when someone in the movies
tastes something foreign or something in the wild
that isn’t usually eaten? They say it tastes like
chicken!

Some actor eats a lizard he says
it tastes like chicken or some other actor has a
strange foreign meal and he says it tastes like
chicken! Now, what are the chances that all
these animals should taste like chicken?

Beef, pork, crab and lobster don't taste like chicken. That blows the ID theory of "Chickeness".

Quote:

Darwinists would say that all these animals
evolved to taste like chicken just by pure chance!

See above.

Quote:

But how is that possible?

Similar physiologies?

Quote:

It’s
astronomically UNLIKELY and practically
IMPOSSIBLE!

Ok, let's see your math. Exactly how impossible is it?

Quote:

:rolling: Obviously, a caring Intelligent
Designer designed these animals to taste like
chicken so that when we run out of normal food
we wouldn’t need to resort to eating bad tasting
food.

Yes, obviously.

Quote:

God had the foresight to make many animals
taste like chicken just as He had the foresight to
make plants photosynthesize carbon dioxide and
produce oxygen so that we could breathe.

Show me the scripture that tells you that God had this foresight. If you can't, may I accuse you of pulling things out of your ass?

Quote:

This is another nail in the coffin for evolution by
chance and more evidence for Darwinists to ignore.
You can’t keep relying on archaic 19th century
science and it’s time to embrace the reality of design
and appreciate God’s well-thought out creation.

Just think about it.

Yay! Another nail in the coffin of Darwinism! If we were to listen everytime some creo declared his brand new theory totally destroys evolution, it would have been dead a long time ago. Thankfully, we don't.

BTW, I want to thank you. Without this insightful post of yours, I wouldn't have anything to submit to Fundies say the darndest things today.

Mageth · 07-10-2008, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drekoguk

Anyway, stop ignoring my evidence, it only makes you all look foolish because you can't counter my argument. I thought Darwinists were smart. :rolling:

People eat rutabagas. Ever tasted a rutabaga? You think that was intelligently designed? (And rutabagas don't taste like chicken!)

Zaphod Beeblebrox · 07-10-2008, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drekoguk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ezkerraldean

aha! ID is religiously motivated.....ever seen wild bananas?wha? that's it?
i've had crocodile, and i didn't think that tasted like chicken.i think this applies to your "kind" more than anyone else's.

so, any actual evidence?

I presented it to you and you promptly ignored it. I guess my prediction came true which means I'm +1 on the "theory" of evolution which predicts absolutely nothing.

That wasn't evidence - that was a new fallacy, the Claim from Dated Humor. Do you seriously think everything tastes like chicken? We treated your initial post as a joke post because it's a ridiculous claim.

Ezkerraldean · 07-10-2008, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drekoguk

I presented it to you and you promptly ignored it. I guess my prediction came true which means I'm +1 on the "theory" of evolution which predicts absolutely nothing.

i'll ask again. ever seen wild bananas?

LampreyMoose · 07-10-2008, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drekoguk

That atheist tag was the default setting.

I seriously doubt that.

Zaphod Beeblebrox · 07-10-2008, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ezkerraldean

Quote:

Originally Posted by drekoguk

I presented it to you and you promptly ignored it. I guess my prediction came true which means I'm +1 on the "theory" of evolution which predicts absolutely nothing.

i'll ask again. ever seen wild bananas?

You should ask about how the bananas seen in grocery stores across the U.S. became the way the are. Sterile triploid, anyone?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.