FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-24-2007, 08:43 AM   #61
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by placebo View Post

Yes. Billions in fact. BUT, just in the minds of the believers.
Of which you are one, perhaps.
No, I'm imagination handicapped.
placebo is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 08:45 AM   #62
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VoxRat View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
That is so very easy to write in lieu of fact and reason.
Quote:
As are your vapid insults.
Yet more cheapness.
Quote:
Deal with the Russell argument
If you don't give your argument, you don't have one. Bare links are usually meretricious.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 08:45 AM   #63
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by placebo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Of which you are one, perhaps.
No, I'm imagination handicapped.
Too late!
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:03 AM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Yet more cheapness.
Quote:
Deal with the Russell argument
If you don't give your argument, you don't have one. Bare links are usually meretricious.
More insults.
What a surprise.
If you don't want to look it up, fine.
For anyone else interested: there's no need to waste any time on this argument; it was thoroughly dismantled by Bertrand Russell.
My expanding on it would be superfluous.
VoxRat is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:09 AM   #65
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
The only drawback is that people are often liable to be too free with the benefit of the doubt with regard to themselves, though.
It make no sense to speak of giving one's self the benefit of the doubt.

Quote:
Obviously we have different perceptions of what constitutes average ability.
I measure it for a living and have done so for the past 17 years.

Quote:
Absolutely. So we must reject the claim here that

'The supernatural cannot happen'

until such time as, for the first time in history, convincing evidence is supplied to support it.
I've already agreed that it is indicative of a closed mind but I would also add that it is stated in an inherently logically problematic fashion (in the same way as your recent attempt to shift burden).

The emphasis should logically be placed upon any evidence alleged to support the claim. An absence of such evidence warrants rejecting the claim as lacking sufficient support for credibility.

No credible evidence supporting the claim = no credible claim.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:29 AM   #66
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
The only drawback is that people are often liable to be too free with the benefit of the doubt with regard to themselves, though.
Quote:
It make no sense to speak of giving one's self the benefit of the doubt.
It is the mark of mankind, imv.

Quote:
I measure it for a living and have done so for the past 17 years.
In Alaska?

Quote:
Absolutely. So we must reject the claim here that

'The supernatural cannot happen'

until such time as, for the first time in history, convincing evidence is supplied to support it.
Quote:
The emphasis should logically be placed upon any evidence alleged to support the claim.
We are agreed.

Quote:
An absence of such evidence warrants rejecting the claim as lacking sufficient support for credibility.
Quite so. So the proposition that the supernatural cannot happen is not carried.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:32 AM   #67
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VoxRat View Post
.
If you don't want to look it up, fine.
There's nothing to find.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:33 AM   #68
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by placebo View Post
This is a little off topic but it has bothered me for a long time. If Jesus played baseball would he hit a home run every at bat or would he lay down a sacrifice bunt occasionally?
Jesus would not play any game that Americans play.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:35 AM   #69
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by placebo View Post
This is a little off topic but it has bothered me for a long time. If Jesus played baseball would he hit a home run every at bat or would he lay down a sacrifice bunt occasionally?
Jesus would not play any game that Americans play.
Because he never existed.
Tangent is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:39 AM   #70
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tangent View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Jesus would not play any game that Americans play.
Because he never existed.
Notice, reader, to whom this remark was directed.
Clouseau is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:31 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.