FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Existence of God(s)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-18-2006, 05:47 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atheist_Forever
Basically my theory is that God is evil. God apparently created all according the Christian religion. In the book it says that God didn't create evil, evil is just the absence of good, and in a sense doesn't exist. Well even if evil doesn't exist this means God made it so humans are capable of being absent off good. This means that God gave us the capabilities to be evil. Then some will argue if God did not do this we would not have free will. This is true, but there were many other options He could of taken. One option being that in the absence of good someone did not behave “evil”, but behaved more humorous, or they behaved confused, the list could go on. Going by the Christian religion God is all-powerful meaning He can do all, but I feel most people don’t have a grasp of how much all is. If this statement is true this means God can logic and reality. If he were to alter reality, so that being absent of good wasn’t even an option or being absent of good was not even part of reality there would be no such thing as evil. This entire theory would be on nothing. This leads me to my next point, some of you may be asking “So what, who cares if I can do evil I like to curse, fight, jack off. Etc. etc.” According to the Christian religion God is good, He is the definition of good, there is no greater good than God. Well in this current society we know that there are many problems in this planet; such as, murder, rape, and poverty. Well if God is so good then why would he allow this to continue, He could of simply made it a better place, but chose not to. Then some may argue “maybe this is the best way”, this is obviously not the best way considering the entire human race is always battling between doing what is right and wrong and going by Christianity all our morals came from God. This brings me to my final point, if God really is so good then why does He allow “absence of good”, one because He is evil and wants it to be this way, or two because He is incapable of changing it, which makes him a liar which is evil according to his rule God, or maybe three He plain old does not exist.


Let's take the realistic things: He's either a lazy old bastard who doesn't care about us, or he doesn't exist.
I'm glad you ended up with the proposal that God does not exist,-I was beginning to wonder why someone who sounds to be an atheist would be presupposing the existence of God, and discussing his alleged attributes at all.
Wads4 is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 05:49 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
Default Atheist forever

"Originally Posted by Atheist_Forever
Witch brings up this question : Why did he create evil? Does he not care if we suffer?"

He didn't, because he isn't.
Wads4 is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 06:35 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lee_merrill
Hi everyone,


Let's see...

I have prayed for healing, and the illness took off, several times. Now the objection may be that this is an "I don't know so God did it" argument, but you asked not for proof, but rather evidence, which this would be, I consider it improbable that I would recover from food poisoning upon praying, for example. More details available upon request...
It is not evidence, it is simply the common logical fallacy of "post hoc ergo propter hoc" (after this therefore because of this).. you prayed, you got better,-so you automatically assume it was your prayer that did it. What about self-limiting illnesses? What about the medical treatment you may perhaps have been getting? Speaking as a doctor I suggest that that which does not kill you allows you to recover, possibly damaged, possibly intact, often with the bonus of immunity to furthur attacks of that illness. Most people soon recover from simple food poisoning,-if that was what it was,--you don't say.
Quote:

God said that Babylon will never be rebuilt, yet Alexander the Great and Saddam Hussein both could have done so, and tried, and failed. Babylon will never be reinhabited! (re Isa. 13:19-20, Jer. 25:12, Jer. 51:26). That ought to be pretty easy to disprove.
So what precisely is preventing someone from re-building Babylon? Saddam was well on the way to doing it,-but he was interrupted. The obvious reason is that it is quite pointless to go and rebuid an ancient city whose time has long gone by, and which nobody needs, especially as there is a large modern city just up the road,-namely Baghdad. What would you have a property speculator do?--build a modern copy on the demolished base of the old one?--but that would be vandalising an ancient archaeological site. Try and stick together the crumbling mud bricks and make some more ( like Saddam did). Buy, borrow or steal the original Ishtar Gate back from the Berlin Museum?
Re-build the Ziggurat and the Temple of Marduk, whom nobody worships any more, (along with thousands of other ancient deities, not only Babylonian ones). Re-route the Euphrates river back to its original position? Try to find the descendants of ethnic semitic Babylonians and abolish their Islamic names and re-name them ones like Nebuchadrezzar Belshazzar, Nabonidus? --that would go down well with the Moslems wouldn't it.
And why stop at re-building Babylon ( and ancient Tyre),--why not rebuild Asshur and Nineveh and Nimrod and Khorsabad, and Ur and Uruk and Lachish. The our developer could go to Egypt and repair and reconstruct the pyramids, karnak, Thebes, Memphis, Abu-simbel etc; then just to show that God smit not only that lot, but also Israel and Judah,--our developer could rebuild samaria, the 1st and 2nd temples of Solomon. Need I go on? The obsessional desire to put the clock back to biblical times is quite pathological. If you are so keen to prove Babylon (and Tyre) cannot be re-built because some spooky Divine Force is physically preventing it why don't you have a go yourself and tell us how you get on. I suspect the reason you fail will be lack of funds because any sponsor would soon tire (Tyre?) of such a daft project.
Quote:

There will always be Jewish people (Jer. 31:35-37; 33:24-26, and re the thread here on this topic). Let us note again the attempts to try this, and the failures, and a recent one with Hitler, who, with an atomic bomb, would probably have had his way with the world.




There's a lot here! Now Hugh Ross (who was just mentioned) holds that the sun became visible on the fourth day (so plants can grow before then), you are giving off reflected light (that is how we see you), the firmament would simply be the boundary between the earth and the clouds, I would say, and we read "God made the stars also," yet without any given time span (note here also that the making of the sun is in this description, which may indicate it had a creation process similar to the stars).
And you take this seriously?
Quote:


Why, may I ask, did they then consider them miracles?

“Belief in miracles, far from depending on an ignorance of the laws of nature, is only possible in and far as those laws are known…. If you have not yet noticed that the sun always rises in the East you will see nothing miraculous about his rising one morning in the West.” (C.S. Lewis)
Does he not think that even ancient humans might think it a bit strange if the sun rose in the West one day, after thousands of years of their ancestors building astronomical observation temples, like Stonehenge, which were accurately aligned to sun rise in the East? Similarly all those Egyptian and other temples were built so that the rising sun would illuminate the far interior, as in the temple of Abu simbel,--what would Rameses II have done I wonder,- demolish his new temple and rebuild it the other way round?--but then what if another miracle happened and the sun rise went back to the east the next day?--O dear!
Quote:


And here are some comments on a selection of the other points...


Yet it seems this connection Jacob thought was there was not real at all, according to the account:

Genesis 31:12 And he said, 'Lift up your eyes and see, all the goats that mate with the flock are striped, spotted, and mottled, for I have seen all that Laban is doing to you.'

Mendel would be proud...


Exodus 9:4 But the Lord will make a distinction between the livestock of Israel and that of Egypt, so that no animal belonging to the Israelites will die.

This would be the source of the cattle? Surely Egyptians would think to buy cattle to replace the ones they lost.


Well, really now, God couldn't do this? To object to a miracle by saying it couldn't happen naturally is just to say it must have been a miracle.


This would then be guaranteed? But God is not into machinery magic.


Did too. Sorry! But each claim needs substantiation.

We have an account that it happened, now are you arguing by silence in archaeology? That would be quite chancy...


Why then was this published, may I ask? To say that many founding fathers rose and appeared to many people in Washington to make more splendid the Bicentennial celebration, well, this ought to be verifiable, if it was so public. And if it then was false, then whatever depends on this claim is discredited.


It seems Atheos is unacquainted with Revelation, or he finds he does not object?


Only every culture, it seems, remembers it. Does that strike you as odd? And our friend Hugh Ross concludes there are gaps in the genealogies, so we need not conclude that the flood happened on Bishop Ussher's timeframe.


Actually, there is good archeological evidence for cities there being conquered about that time (see "Cities of the Biblical World," by DeVries).


Time to check Hugh Ross, his view is different. Exclamation point! You are arguing against a view that neither Carin Nel nor I nor Hugh Ross seem to hold.


"We know very little about prehistoric man, for the excellent reason that he is prehistoric" (G.K. Chesterton)


Fulfilled prophecy! And most of the other creation stories are not at all so defensible as Genesis, with cows and ice giants and so forth.


Well, it's a conclusion, based on the best evidence we can find. Of course, no one can prove that God is not deceiving us, if he is real, nor can you prove that God does not, for sure, exist. So we try and estimate, and proceed from there...

Regards,
Lee
Wads4 is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 03:12 PM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
Default Lee Merrill

""We know very little about prehistoric man, for the excellent reason that he is prehistoric" (G.K. Chesterton)"

How very profound. The terrible trio of C.S.Lewis, Hugh Ross and G.K. Chesterton seem to br vying with each other in lunatic pronouncements.
Wads4 is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 03:25 PM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 3,813
Default

Is that like Larry, Curly, and Moe?
jackrabbit is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 06:20 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,074
Default

Hi everyone,

Quote:
Jackrabbit: So basically these civilizations somehow didn't notice there was a worldwide flood, even though they all should have all died from it.
Though I also said that there may well be gaps in the genealogies, so then the time need not be by Bishop Ussher's calculations.

Quote:
Lee: And I also came across a mention of such a healing...

Jackrabbit: Do you really expect us to believe this? Do you have the before and after pictures?
I tell you what I know, with links to the people if you would want to inquire further.

Quote:
Gawen: Isn't it simply amazing how we hear of such miracles from the devout, but we don't hear of such miracles in Medical publications?

Atheos: I bet the doctors, hospital, etc., somehow neglected to make any notations about this great miracle. Somehow the whole thing ended up completely undocumented.
There is actually a report of a boy being raised from the dead, with a photo of the death certificate, and the address of the family, in "Only Love Can Make a Miracle" (Mahesh Chavda). And you may contact Peter Wagner if you wish, or the Anaheim Vineyard, and so forth...

Quote:
And here we have your belief from just hearsay. Why, if I believed in miracles they would all be held in high esteem.
If you were a person whose integrity I held in high esteem, that would also be required...

Quote:
Then I guess all Christians are screwed for not obeying the Law.
Actually, with the love of God in a person's heart, through his presence there, a person can fulfill the law, but not in their own ability, and not perfectly, but it can be done.

Quote:
Atheos: Every one of these prayers -- every last one -- receives the same answer: Reverberating silence.
How do you know that, may I ask? Skeptics seem to almost claim omniscience, to virtually be God, in order to prove that he does not exist.

Quote:
Concerning biblical examples of Yahweh's "caring", did Yahweh care about Nadab and Abihu when he allegedly blasted them out of existence with fire from heaven (Leviticus 10:1-2)? ... Ditto Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5).
God is indeed holy, as well as loving. Do you demand justice? Would you like justice for all your deeds, strict and instantaneous? You might find it rather difficult.

Isaiah 33:14 The sinners in Zion are afraid; trembling has seized the godless: "Who among us can dwell with the consuming fire? Who among us can dwell with everlasting burnings?"

Quote:
Did Yahweh care about the Midianite virgins he let the invading Israelite hoards plunder (Numbers 31) or the mothers and little boys who they ruthlessly killed (Numbers 31:17) while keeping the virgin daughters to do with as they pleased?
Yes, I believe he does care, through what he showed on the cross.

Quote:
The evidence strongly tells me that Yahweh only cares about blind, unquestioning obedience.
He lets me ask questions! And has very good answers, I must say.

Isaiah 1:18 "Come now, let us reason together," says the Lord...

Matthew 7:8 For everyone who asks receives, and the one who seeks finds, and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.

Quote:
and still others that seem thoroughly abominable (condoning slavery...
Yet not all the laws are at the boundary between sinning and not sinning:

Deuteronomy 23:15-16 If a slave has taken refuge with you, do not hand him over to his master. Let him live among you wherever he likes and in whatever town he chooses. Do not oppress him.

Quote:
Atheos: Seems to me he could have just created a bunch of unquestioning, obedient servants in the first place and spared everyone all this suffering.

Wads4: Why did he create evil? Does he not care if we suffer?
Though maybe he sought real relationship? For I believe people within the will of God can really choose, that his will is not a monorail. And if there was nothing to overcome, what would there be to reward?

Quote:
Wads4: you prayed, you got better,-so you automatically assume it was your prayer that did it.
Wads4 also is omniscient! Now we have two Gods, and this may present a problem.

Quote:
What about self-limiting illnesses? What about the medical treatment you may perhaps have been getting?
Well, what happened in one instance is that I ate some questionable fish, and called in sick the next day at work, ate some more the next week, felt the same symptoms coming on, prayed, and though my stomach kept bubbling, otherwise I was fine, I went to work. Now this is not proof, but I would consider it evidence, and evidence that God cares, and is willing and able to help people.

Quote:
Wads4: So what precisely is preventing someone from re-building Babylon? Saddam was well on the way to doing it,-but he was interrupted. The obvious reason is that it is quite pointless to go and rebuid an ancient city whose time has long gone by...
Well right, just for the fun of it, yet Saddam and Alex both had the resources and the inclination to do it, and they both failed. That might give us pause.

Quote:
What would you have a property speculator do?--build a modern copy on the demolished base of the old one?--but that would be vandalising an ancient archaeological site. Try and stick together the crumbling mud bricks and make some more ( like Saddam did). Buy, borrow or steal the original Ishtar Gate back from the Berlin Museum?
I would consider rebuilding to be what the Bible describes in rebuilding Jerusalem in the books of Nehemiah etc. And reinhabiting need not be done by Babylonians! Any group of people dwelling there long enough to be called inhabitants (say 10 years) would do.

Quote:
I suspect the reason you fail will be lack of funds because any sponsor would soon tire (Tyre?) of such a daft project.
I would think the Muslims might be interested in such a plain overthrow of a passage in the Bible! Some skeptics too, especially just for reinhabiting, this would not require so much effort, I would think it cheap at the price. Why spend so much energy and effort to overthrow the Bible, if all you need is to get people to live in one old city site? So simple, so easy, yet apparently difficult, say Saddam and Alex...

Quote:
Lee: Now Hugh Ross (who was just mentioned) holds that the sun became visible on the fourth day (so plants can grow before then), you are giving off reflected light (that is how we see you), the firmament would simply be the boundary between the earth and the clouds...

Wads4: And you take this seriously?
Actually, I post this because I disbelieve it entirely!

Quote:
Wads4: Does he not think that even ancient humans might think it a bit strange if the sun rose in the West one day, after thousands of years of their ancestors building astronomical observation temples...
Quite so, and so people didn't believe in miracles just because they didn't know any science.

Quote:
"We know very little about prehistoric man, for the excellent reason that he is prehistoric" (G.K. Chesterton)"

How very profound.
Sometimes simple statements like this do need to be made, though. And I thought it was kind of cheerful humor, Chesterton is fun to quote.

Regards,
Lee
lee_merrill is offline  
Old 04-18-2006, 10:38 PM   #47
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Bible Belt (Texas)!
Posts: 592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lee_merrill
Hi everyone,
Though I also said that there may well be gaps in the genealogies, so then the time need not be by Bishop Ussher's calculations.
Okay, I think I got it. These ancient civilizations were plodding happily along, when all the sudden a flood comes, and kills everyone but Noah, right? Then, Noah's decendants come trotting along...however many yearsd later, and they see all these abandoned (if waterlogged) cities, and they just pick up right where these civilizations left off, just a long time later. Did I get all this right?

This kind of reasoning is so absurd, it's almost poetic. Seriously.

Lee, as maddening as your posts can be, I really do hope that someday you come to your senses and discard at least some of this nonsense. I know xtians are really good at partitioning off these weird beliefs from their "normal" life, and I don't know what kind of person you are in real life, but I just can't help thinking that believing this kind of fantastical nonsense can't be good for you.
Jaggers is offline  
Old 04-19-2006, 01:16 AM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
Default Lee Merill

"Well right, just for the fun of it, yet Saddam and Alex both had the resources and the inclination to do it, and they both failed. That might give us pause."

People fail all the time, -- compare with new business enterprises. Besides it hardly helped Saddam that he was being invaded and bombed while trying to cast mud-bricks. Coluld you do it?
Wads4 is offline  
Old 04-19-2006, 01:21 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
Default Lee Merill

"Quite so, and so people didn't believe in miracles just because they didn't know any science."

They were necessarily practical people, and their astronomy was directed to important agricultural questions of sowing and harvesting. I doubt if they had identifiable concepts like "miracle" or "science",--they just did what had to be done,-whether planting crops or appeasing their gods ( in the case of the Aztecs by mass human sacrifice).
Wads4 is offline  
Old 04-19-2006, 01:24 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
Default Lee Merill

"Quote:
Wads4: you prayed, you got better,-so you automatically assume it was your prayer that did it.

Wads4 also is omniscient! Now we have two Gods, and this may present a problem."

No, I just draw conclusions based on what you have told us, as well as pointing out the logical fallacy of it--that merely requires a bit of research and detective-work--not omniscience.
Wads4 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.