FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2007, 04:13 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by douglas View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by reniaa View Post
why would the bible call jesus God's son knowing how we view father and son relationships then bring in the whole 3 in 1 thing...but it doesn't because trinity isn't a bible teaching which is the OP point and one that puts me off most trinity taught christian religions but I keep looking in hope.
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. As Chili has already pointed out, you have a father, and you have a son. The "holy spirit" supposedly represents the love that exists between them. Hence, the trinity.

A trinitarian would argue that you can't only have a father and a son. You must have a spiritual bond that connects them. If there is no bond, than they are just two unrelated, unconnected strangers.
I've heard the hypothesis that this trinity idea was based upon the "family" concept of other religions (father, mother, child), with some references being used to show that the holy spirit was/became sort-of feminine (replacing Mary) or some such - there are a few different arguments, and nothing really sticks in my head right now.

Not sure of the validity or possibility to that, but it's another idea to toss out.
badger3k is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 05:38 PM   #32
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reniaa View Post
[still doesn't explain why trinity as a word doesn't appear in the bible which it would for such a central teaching. It amuses me no end how trinitarians constantly try to explain 3 into 1 by as many means possible. Always missing the point that the bible says more than anything else that jesus is God's son, he could be just that, a special creation made before everything else. We are made in god's image and if a man has a son he a separate being to his dad he can be a lot like him but he is still separate.

why would the bible call jesus God's son knowing how we view father and son relationships then bring in the whole 3 in 1 thing...but it doesn't because trinity isn't a bible teaching which is the OP point and one that puts me off most trinity taught christian religions but I keep looking in hope.

the trinitarian belief wasn't confirmed as a definate concept till the council of nicea in 325 AD and strongly influenced by the overseership of constantine.

It could be safe to say without John 1:1 there would be no trinity.
It is because Jesus is not God's son that the 3 in 1 thing is needed. Christ was/is God's son and Jesus was/is the reason that the trinity can collapse from the moment that Christ is reborn in us as it first was demonstated was way back then.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 06:00 PM   #33
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by douglas View Post
[I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. As Chili has already pointed out, you have a father, and you have a son. The "holy spirit" supposedly represents the love that exists between them. Hence, the trinity.

A trinitarian would argue that you can't only have a father and a son. You must have a spiritual bond that connects them. If there is no bond, than they are just two unrelated, unconnected strangers.
They are correct especially since the son is incarnate of the father which in turn is the reason for the existence of the HS to say at least that this interpersonal relationship is what makes the spirit of God holy in our sight.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 06:08 PM   #34
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badger3k View Post
I've heard the hypothesis that this trinity idea was based upon the "family" concept of other religions (father, mother, child), with some references being used to show that the holy spirit was/became sort-of feminine (replacing Mary) or some such - there are a few different arguments, and nothing really sticks in my head right now.

Not sure of the validity or possibility to that, but it's another idea to toss out.
Sure, but the mother is not known until just prior to the descend of the dove which ends the trinitarian relationship between the father and the son because the father and son are one at this time. So really, Mary replaces the
HS as theotokos in the live of the so empowered believer.
Chili is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 10:27 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huff View Post
Hi all :wave: , I have been lurking on this site for quite a while and I enjoy the scholarly debate found on this forum. I have a question that I'm not sure about and after a search I didn't see anything come up in the first couple of pages (let me apologize if I should have searched further.) Is the trinity a biblical concept or is it something that has been designed by Protestants, kind of like the rapture. I was raised as a Southern Baptist and I am familiar with the logic that father, the son, and the holy spirit are three separate entities but somehow the same. Luckily I have the ability to look at things objectively/rationally and I turned out not to be a Southern Baptist after all!
Well, you have gotten a lot of whacky responses to this question. The Trinity is evident throughout the whole Bible. The word is not in the Bible, but the concept is there. It is a theological term that attempts to describe succinctly what the Bible teaches about God's nature. You can get on any good Protestant website and get tons of scripture and information on it. Try Hank Hanegraff's website or any good evangelical website. A lot of Catholic websites are probably good as well on this question. The short answer is that is wasn't invented by the Catholics or anyone, it is revealed in the Bible by God himself.

P.S. Your old Southern Baptist pastor can probably give you a much better answer than most people on this website.
aChristian is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 03:04 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salam View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by reniaa View Post

hmmm been looking into it not sure jesus had to be divine but he did have to be perfect to wipe out the imperfection of adam.
OK, let's say Jesus is perfect but not divine.
But he's not perfect! He said so himself!

Mark 10:18 (also Luke 18:19) (NIV) "Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good—except God alone."

Unless you can be perfect without being good?
Joan of Bark is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 06:09 AM   #37
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salam View Post

OK, let's say Jesus is perfect but not divine.
But he's not perfect! He said so himself!

Mark 10:18 (also Luke 18:19) (NIV) "Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good—except God alone."

Unless you can be perfect without being good?
He had a dual identity of which one had to be crucified to set the other one free. This made him a 'saved sinner' on his way to heaven if and only if he could get his adamic sin nature nailed to the cross.
Chili is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 08:03 AM   #38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post
Well, you have gotten a lot of whacky responses to this question. The Trinity is evident throughout the whole Bible. The word is not in the Bible, but the concept is there. It is a theological term that attempts to describe succinctly what the Bible teaches about God's nature. You can get on any good Protestant website and get tons of scripture and information on it. Try Hank Hanegraff's website or any good evangelical website. A lot of Catholic websites are probably good as well on this question. The short answer is that is wasn't invented by the Catholics or anyone, it is revealed in the Bible by God himself.
You have no clue what the trinity means or where it came from, do you aChristian? You're just trolling for converts. I dare anyone to got to Hank's website and make heads or tails out of the explanation. The newadvent.org explanation is better, in that it at least acknowledges the history behind the concept.

Quote:
P.S. Your old Southern Baptist pastor can probably give you a much better answer than most people on this website.
Is this one of those "wacky responses" you were referring to? I just hope your baptist pastor doesn't happen to be this guy.
douglas is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 10:05 AM   #39
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by douglas View Post
You have no clue what the trinity means or where it came from, do you aChristian? You're just trolling for converts. I dare anyone to got to Hank's website and make heads or tails out of the explanation. The newadvent.org explanation is better, in that it at least acknowledges the history behind the concept.

Quote:
P.S. Your old Southern Baptist pastor can probably give you a much better answer than most people on this website.
Is this one of those "wacky responses" you were referring to? I just hope your baptist pastor doesn't happen to be this guy.
Yea, I think I have a good understanding of the Trinity and where it came from. My simple explanation in my first post of where it came from is accurate and succinct. The website that you gave is also pretty good. I skimmed over the beginning and although there may be a few points on which I disagree with them, it is one of those Catholic websites that are pretty good that I mentioned in my first post.

Trolling for converts? Of course I am. I don't want to see anyone go to hell. I am just putting in a word now and then in case anyone is interested in the truth.

By the way, I don't have a baptist pastor. I assume you misread the earlier post.
aChristian is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 10:57 AM   #40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post
Trolling for converts? Of course I am. I don't want to see anyone go to hell. I am just putting in a word now and then in case anyone is interested in the truth.
Oh, I see. Praise the lord! :Cheeky: There are basically three types of useful people who post on this board, aChrisitian.
  1. Teachers
  2. Learners
  3. Teachers/Learners

People who fall into group #3 are indispensable. I find group #1 to be the least interesting, and the group that you seem to picture yourself among. For someone who had the audacity to call the other excellent and thoughtful responses "wacky", you provided a ridiculously poor explanation yourself.

We can all google "trinity" for a list of websites, aChristian. If you don't have anything substantive to add, I would suggest that you keep your now-and-then postings to less "now" and more "then."
douglas is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:25 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.