Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-13-2011, 07:15 PM | #441 |
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
|
|
11-13-2011, 08:49 PM | #442 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
In order for Sinaiticus gMark to be compatible with the words of the Prophet in Isaiah 6 the Jews Must NOT know or understand that Jesus was the SAVIOR and Messiah UNTIL "the cities be wasted without inhabitant, and the houses without man and the land be desolate".
In effect, gMark MUST end as it does in the Sinaiticus Codex. The disciples of Jesus in gMark will KNOW that Jesus was the Savior and Messiah when they see the Fall of the Temple and the destruction of Jerusalem. These events MUST happen first in gMark. There was NO new religion under the name of Christ up to the Fall of the Temple and the destruction of Jerusalem or up to the time the author of Sinaiticus gMark wrote his story which was LIFTED from Isaiah 6.11-12. According to the Church it was Peter who DENIED ever knowing Jesus that told gMark the FICTION story. Examine the LAST recorded words of Peter in gMark. Mark 14.71 Quote:
If it is NOT true then the Church and its writers are the LIARS or provided False information. The author of gMark merely wrote what PETER PREACHED. "Against Heresies" 3.1.1 Quote:
If it is NOT true then the Church and its writers were LYING or provided False information. gMark is the Perfect HJ argument killer. |
||
11-14-2011, 07:19 PM | #443 | ||
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
|
Quote:
|
||
11-14-2011, 09:10 PM | #444 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
I have IDENTIFIED 17 events with Jesus in 11 chapters of Sinaiticus gMark that are Absolute Fiction, that is, those events have ZERO historical value and are Fiction whether or NOT Jesus did exist.
Sinaiticus gMark CANNOT be an historically accurate document as it is presented. Now, the Sinaiticus gMark appears to have been interpolated as 12 verses were added to the 16th chapter of the Alexandrinus gMark and other Codices. Let us examine those 12 verses that were added in Alexandrinus gMark. Mark 16.9-20 Quote:
gMark in any version CANNOT be historically accurate and cannot be accepted as history WITHOUT any credible external non-apologetic corroboration from antiquity. gMark is the Perfect HJ argument killer. |
|
11-14-2011, 11:17 PM | #445 | ||
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
|
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|