![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ape town
Posts: 169
|
![]()
Adam/ Eve's sin and the torture of Jesus/God = Atonement
God created A&E beings knowing from the start that they would not please him. And when they would not please him, he knew he would have to arrange to have the humans torture and kill him/God in the form of Jesus so that he could forgive them for being the way he created them to be and the way he knew they would be from the beginning. And he knew, at the beginning, that if people did not accept that he would do something so utterly ridiculous, he would have to cast them into hell where they would weep and gnash their teeth in a lake of fire forever. All this to please his own fragile ego, apparently. This is the most ridiculous concept I have ever been asked to accept, and I don't accept it. I cannot accept that an all knowing, all perfect, all good God would be such a sadistic idiot. Apparently Christians can. God sacrificed himself to himself to satisfy his anger and human beings for being exactly the way he created them to be and for being exactly the way he knew they would be from the beginnning of time. And yet God now threatens to torture people for eternity if they don't believe that he is stupid enough to do something like this. It constantly amazes me that Christians can pretend that this makes some kind of sense. Bumper Sticker DIVINE INSANITY God killed himself on the cross to save his own creation fro�*m his own wrath ! (Author unknown) |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The deformation age
Posts: 1,809
|
![]()
One would question the omnipotence {and sanity} of a God that had to let himself be killed in order to correct his own mistake. Why was the "shedding of blood" necessary? Why not just snap his fingers and say "Ok, here you go, believe in me and you're all saved"? In fact, why is belief even necessary in order to be "pure in the eyes of God"? I'd think that living a holy, decent life would be far more important than faith.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: American by birth, Southern by the grace of God!
Posts: 2,657
|
![]()
I don't have a lot of time this morning, but JD's take:
The death of Christ on the cross was a living analogy for the effects of MAN's Sin on Creation and our eternal soul and the requirements of God to atone for the stain of Sin on the eternal spirit. Christ suffered horribly as Man in the flesh and mind, but the true suffering occured when Christ as God and Man, suffered seperation from the Godhead to atone for the effect of Sin on Man's eternal spirit. This was the ultimate sacrifice and atonement. Christ was atoning for Man's mistake through Free Will, not God's graciousness in allowing Free Will. Man killed Christ from Original Sin to death on the Cross. The amazing thing is-Christ allowed it. For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. -JD |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The deformation age
Posts: 1,809
|
![]() Quote:
That, seriously, makes no sense; in the same way that a Catholic ritual makes no sense-- it's purely symbolic, and there's absolutely no need for it to exist. Instead of wasting however many decades he was on Earth while men still died and went to Hell, why not just snap his fingers up above and "atone" for the sins of man? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: American by birth, Southern by the grace of God!
Posts: 2,657
|
![]() Quote:
Faith - what Adam and Eve did not have. ............................. Matthew 13 10The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?�? 11He replied, “The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. 12Whoever has will be given more, and he will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him. 13This is why I speak to them in parables: “Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand. 14In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah: “ ‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving. 15For this people's heart has become calloused; they hardly hear with their ears, and they have closed their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them.’ 16But blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear. 17For I tell you the truth, many prophets and righteous men longed to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NW Florida, USA
Posts: 1,279
|
![]()
Not all Christians subscribe to the satisfaction theory of the atonement. To put it in a historical perspective, this particular theory is the work of Anselm, roughly 1000 years after the death of Christ.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
|
![]() Quote:
![]() :rolling: :rolling: :rolling: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 2,449
|
![]()
Or was it god atoning for his sins against mankind?
Eldarion Lathria |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Contributor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
|
![]()
FWIW, this is why many Christians don't accept the speculation that Jesus saves us through substitutionary atonement.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|