Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-09-2007, 01:08 PM | #761 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
|
Funny, thanks! :blush:
Of course, the universe is still expanding. But really, yeah. That's a good example of the kind of lengths the rabbis will go to, to avoid thinking of their male warlord god as a breasted goddess. |
10-09-2007, 01:23 PM | #762 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
If you check the book I linked to, you would see that the author is linking Shaddai to the principle of finitude.
And of course, not everyone thinks that the universe is expanding: some of us think it may be infinite Quote:
|
|
10-09-2007, 04:35 PM | #763 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
One finds the $DYYN referred to in an ancient inscription from Deir Alla in Jordan from no later than the 8th c. BCE, known as the "oracle of Balaam", a name known from several oracles at the end of Numbers. In this inscription the $DYYN are a group of gods who are El's council -- shades of Ps 82 --, so the term Shadday exists independently from El and the El-Shadday of Genesis. And the plural $DYYN (which looks Aramaic, but may be Canaanite) is certainly not derivable from $D ("breast"), which should be Heb: $DYM or Aram: $DYN -- the double YOD not allowing the etymology. spin |
|
10-09-2007, 05:16 PM | #764 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,642
|
I suspect we're getting a little out of dave's depth here.
But fascinating stuff, nonetheless. Selah! |
10-09-2007, 05:58 PM | #765 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 4,157
|
Quote:
regards, NinJay |
|
10-09-2007, 06:30 PM | #766 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
|
Did the Hebrews even have a word for goddess, tho? What was it? The idea of goddess worship was so abhorred, I would not be surprised to see one hidden within a masculine word.
Quote:
Certainly a god-name associated completely with fertility and nurturace would not be named "Violence" or "Destruction." That makes no sense. |
|
10-09-2007, 06:39 PM | #767 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 4,157
|
Quote:
regards, NinJay |
|
10-09-2007, 07:37 PM | #768 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
Goddesses were only later abhorred. The oak in the sanctuary where Joshua erected a pillar was sacred to Asherah. There are two Judean inscriptions from around 800 BCE which feature "Yahweh and his Asherah". Only later did what happened under every green tree become an abhorrence. Quote:
Quote:
spin |
||||
10-09-2007, 08:22 PM | #769 | |||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://books.google.com/books?id=7WA...Uafyt4uoPEbZU4 but I don't find that to be clear or conclusive. The link mentions a "mountain" meaning. But thanks for the info. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||
10-09-2007, 09:43 PM | #770 | ||||||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If I understand what you are referring to correctly, the letter is a YOD, not a DALET. $DYYN has a double YOD. My comment was about any connection with $D, "breast", the plural of which is $DYM (Joel 2:16). I see no way to account for the double YOD. Quote:
Why shouldn't a powerful god be nice to a believer? Quote:
Your problem is that you are trying to read your desires into a term that doesn't help you. "El-Shaddai" is male and Shaddai doesn't seem to have anything to do with breasts. Your position seems like wild conjecture to me. If it was someone's idea before you, blame them and beat a quick exit. spin |
||||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|