FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Evolution/Creation
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2004, 07:19 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 703
Default No transitionals, says AiG

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/3076.asp

AiG claims here that it 'interviewed' several museum curators/scientists, and that they admitted that there were no transitionals.

Out of context quotes? Didn't occur? I wonder what BS AiG pulled here.
mountain_hare is offline  
Old 12-03-2004, 07:45 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
Default

Niles Eldredge was so upset by the way he was misrepresented by Luther Sunderland that he spent part of his book "The Triumph of Evolution" setting the record straight. The Patterson incident was the one where a creationist was in a lecture given by Dr Patterson about systematics and taped the lecture and handed the tape over to Luther Sunderland, who publicised parts of it in the guise of a general talk about evolution. David Raup was also not talking about the lack of transitional series; he said that horse evolution was more complex than had been thought earlier and it was incorrect to think of the fossils as a linear set of ancestors and descendents.

http://www.holysmoke.org/icr7cult.htm

Typical set of half-truths and downright untruths from a creationist ministry.
Albion is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:49 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.