Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-02-2006, 06:03 AM | #51 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
01-02-2006, 07:54 AM | #52 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
01-02-2006, 01:27 PM | #54 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
01-02-2006, 02:54 PM | #55 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
01-03-2006, 06:15 PM | #56 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LOS ANGELES
Posts: 544
|
Quote:
Next question. Ray |
|
01-03-2006, 07:28 PM | #57 | |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
|
|
01-04-2006, 09:24 AM | #58 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
Could there be some other reason for a lack of contemporaneous support? After all, there were no online news media in those days and no reason to think the 1st generation of disciples were even literate. BTW, I consider "Q" to have been contemporaneous documentary evidence, along with some bits of GThomas and the undisputed Pauline Epistles (omitting as disputed: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thess, the Timothys and Titus). I would also judge Mark, M & L, judiciously considered, to be evidentiary. |
|
01-04-2006, 09:31 AM | #59 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
|
|
01-04-2006, 09:46 AM | #60 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|