![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LOS ANGELES
Posts: 544
|
Quote:
Next question. Ray |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
Could there be some other reason for a lack of contemporaneous support? After all, there were no online news media in those days and no reason to think the 1st generation of disciples were even literate. BTW, I consider "Q" to have been contemporaneous documentary evidence, along with some bits of GThomas and the undisputed Pauline Epistles (omitting as disputed: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thess, the Timothys and Titus). I would also judge Mark, M & L, judiciously considered, to be evidentiary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|