FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-02-2006, 06:03 AM   #51
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
Matthew and Luke also have material not from Mark which could be from a different tradition altogether.
Yes, there is Q, and both M and L have their own material. Does their special material need to go back to a tradition?
mikem is offline  
Old 01-02-2006, 07:54 AM   #52
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikem
Yes, there is Q, and both M and L have their own material. Does their special material need to go back to a tradition?
If Q, then certainly. I would also argue that some material in M and L go back to an early tradition. We discussed it here.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 01-02-2006, 12:07 PM   #53
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

mata leao's claim that atheists reject god because of bitterness or bad religious experiences and responses have been split off here
Toto is offline  
Old 01-02-2006, 01:27 PM   #54
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
If Q, then certainly. I would also argue that some material in M and L go back to an early tradition. We discussed it here.
Thanks Chris, I'll take a look. It seems every question I raise has already been dissected!
mikem is offline  
Old 01-02-2006, 02:54 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikem
Thanks Chris, I'll take a look. It seems every question I raise has already been dissected!
Probably a million times in a million different places. But hey, that's the nature of learning. And we are all still learning.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 06:15 PM   #56
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: LOS ANGELES
Posts: 544
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
I look forward to reading comments from readers.
The enemies of Christianity - the Jesus Seminar accept Christ crucified.

Next question.

Ray
WILLOWTREE is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 07:28 PM   #57
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WILLOWTREE
The enemies of Christianity - the Jesus Seminar accept Christ crucified.

Next question.
How are the members of the JS "enemies of Christianity?" Most of them are Christians.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 01-04-2006, 09:24 AM   #58
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountain Man
... A complete lack of contemporary [eyewitness] support for something like this speaks loudly. ...

Could there be some other reason for a lack of contemporaneous support? After all, there were no online news media in those days and no reason to think the 1st generation of disciples were even literate.

BTW, I consider "Q" to have been contemporaneous documentary evidence, along with some bits of GThomas and the undisputed Pauline Epistles (omitting as disputed: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thess, the Timothys and Titus). I would also judge Mark, M & L, judiciously considered, to be evidentiary.
mens_sana is offline  
Old 01-04-2006, 09:31 AM   #59
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgibson000
They fall with the genre of Helleinistic BIOI.
From what I've read, the Gospel genre seems to combine the BIOS with the Encomium. Both types can include a lot of fiction, while conveying at least some core history.
mens_sana is offline  
Old 01-04-2006, 09:46 AM   #60
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 1/2 mile west of the Rio sin Grande
Posts: 397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
Name the storytelling conventions of the Hellenistic Romantic Fictions that occur in the Gospels/Acts? Certainly. Here are a few
  • Story elements
:
crucifixions
emtpy tombs
return from death/narrow reprieves from death
travel narratives
trials before local potentates
the person is innocent, but either insists on guilt and demands to be executed or does not protest
explanations of exotic customs
entering the city and being taken for a divine personage
being a child of god/like a god
crowds following the hero
restricted range of settings for the tale
recognition scenes at the end
prayers granted by the gods
protagonist has no childhood, life begins at young adulthood
religious themes
  • construction elements
use of history and historical characters
episodic style
doublets and triplets
chiastic structures
creation by paralleling events from history and sacred texts
scenes that function as typologies for the story
That's a very thorough list of period novelistic elements. It fits nicely with the Greek novels found in B.P. Reardon's Collected Ancient Greek Novels (U.Cal. Press). Allowing for a change in time period, we could find them in Gone With The Wind. Trouble is, GWTW also contains some decent history, so the sheer presence of novel elements in a period that did not recognize the rigors of what we call "history" should not be used to throw out both baby and bathwater. IMHO, of course.
mens_sana is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.