FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-25-2009, 12:09 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Victoria. Australia
Posts: 1,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post

Herod ignored Caligula's decree - wisely. That is why the great war occured later in 70 CE, when Nero resurrected this decree again. This shows that the Jews would have not gone to war on taxes alone [even when their tax rate was greater than for others], even when Rome appointed foreigners like Herod to rule Judea, but they would have gone to war and sacrificed their nation in defense of their belief. The Jews put up the greatest defense for their belief than any peoples in Geo-History.
Yes but it wasn't Herod the Great / Herod I that ignored Caligula's decree. Sorry to be picky but you need to specify which Herod it was that ignored Caligula's decree.
Waning Moon Conrad is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 06:48 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waning Moon Conrad View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post

Herod ignored Caligula's decree - wisely. That is why the great war occured later in 70 CE, when Nero resurrected this decree again. This shows that the Jews would have not gone to war on taxes alone [even when their tax rate was greater than for others], even when Rome appointed foreigners like Herod to rule Judea, but they would have gone to war and sacrificed their nation in defense of their belief. The Jews put up the greatest defense for their belief than any peoples in Geo-History.
Yes but it wasn't Herod the Great / Herod I that ignored Caligula's decree. Sorry to be picky but you need to specify which Herod it was that ignored Caligula's decree.
Correct. It was Herod the Great's son.
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:11 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post

A reasonably good description. However, because of the mis-rep from Christianity and Islam, the Jewish defense of the right to freedom of belief, which was flaunted by Rome, and impacting only on one nation - remains unrecognised and distorted. This sublime right of humanity was nowhere defended better than by the Jews in 70 CE. The event of 70 CE should be made a pivotal honoring by the world, but is falsely antithetised due to competing agendas.
I kind of agree with this. But the defenders of Jewish liberty in 70 ce were the Zealots, none of whom I would want to meet. They were unprincipled, irreligious and disdainful of any moderation of belief or action. They took the Jews' already shaky reputation among the Hellenistic pagans and brought it even lower. They forced the end of a thousand years of Hebrew tradition by acting like criminals. I suppose one could argue that they enabled God to test his people and preserve a faithful remnant, but this would've been cold comfort to those killed or enslaved.
bacht is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 07:57 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Left Behind on CA Central Coast May 21, 2011
Posts: 7,942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post


The issue of blah, blah, blah.

Re Titus, Berenice and Vaspasian. blah, blah, blah.
Quote:

BTW, still waiting for those historical references Joe.
:deadhorse:
dragoon is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 09:01 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bacht View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post

A reasonably good description. However, because of the mis-rep from Christianity and Islam, the Jewish defense of the right to freedom of belief, which was flaunted by Rome, and impacting only on one nation - remains unrecognised and distorted. This sublime right of humanity was nowhere defended better than by the Jews in 70 CE. The event of 70 CE should be made a pivotal honoring by the world, but is falsely antithetised due to competing agendas.
I kind of agree with this. But the defenders of Jewish liberty in 70 ce were the Zealots, none of whom I would want to meet. They were unprincipled, irreligious and disdainful of any moderation of belief or action. They took the Jews' already shaky reputation among the Hellenistic pagans and brought it even lower. They forced the end of a thousand years of Hebrew tradition by acting like criminals. I suppose one could argue that they enabled God to test his people and preserve a faithful remnant, but this would've been cold comfort to those killed or enslaved.
There was a Jewish war but I'm not sure "Jewish liberty" was an objective... this has been discussed here before and I don't recall seeing any kind of rational explanation for what happened.

IAJ seems better prepared than usual but I doubt that all the Christians fled and all the Jews stayed. The Palestinians presumably stayed. I'd like to think that my ancestors were in the first caravan out.

There is also the fact that many of the Jewish casualties were killed by the zealots and whatever other whack jobs were around at the time. In fact the various Jewish factions were busily exterminating people in Jerusalem and preventing them from leaving while the Romans were building a wall around the city.

IAJ has also reduced his Jewish casualties estimate from 1.1 to .8 million or 27%. Not sure what prompted this reduction, but this is still very close to the probable entire population of Judea going into the war. It would be interesting to see how many of these people were killed by Jewish crazies versus Romans. Probably virtually every casualty in Jerusalem can indirectly be assigned to the Jewish "defenders."

Regarding the Romans having sex with their concubines while they watched the crucified Jews dying; this is horrible but kinky, and like many here, I doubt that it is true. However it does appear possible; if I was a Roman officer, I can imagine going to see the carnage, but don't think I would take my concubine(s). However, assuming some of the Romans made the decision to take their concubines, it is logical that a certain percentage of this group would wind up having sex. I'm not sure there is anything concrete we can learn from this anecdote.

The underlying reason for the war is still not clear. If "freedom of belief" was any part of this, I'd be interested in seeing references myself.
semiopen is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 10:07 AM   #46
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waning Moon Conrad View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post

Herod ignored Caligula's decree - wisely. That is why the great war occured later in 70 CE, when Nero resurrected this decree again. This shows that the Jews would have not gone to war on taxes alone [even when their tax rate was greater than for others], even when Rome appointed foreigners like Herod to rule Judea, but they would have gone to war and sacrificed their nation in defense of their belief. The Jews put up the greatest defense for their belief than any peoples in Geo-History.
Yes but it wasn't Herod the Great / Herod I that ignored Caligula's decree. Sorry to be picky but you need to specify which Herod it was that ignored Caligula's decree.
Actually Agrippa, the Herodian king, stayed the fuck out of it, when rioting developed, as did Petronius the legate in Syria. Luckily Caligula met Cassius Chaerea in a dark passage on the Palatine and the statue was forgotten about.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 10:59 AM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by semiopen View Post
Regarding the Romans having sex with their concubines while they watched the crucified Jews dying; this is horrible but kinky, and like many here, I doubt that it is true. However it does appear possible; if I was a Roman officer, I can imagine going to see the carnage, but don't think I would take my concubine(s). However, assuming some of the Romans made the decision to take their concubines, it is logical that a certain percentage of this group would wind up having sex. I'm not sure there is anything concrete we can learn from this anecdote.
Unfortunately, IAJ's anecdote is trying to pin on the Romans what a Jewish ruler had done to his fellow Jews:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josephus, Antiquities 13.14.2
Now as Alexander [Jannaeus] fled to the mountains, six thousand of the Jews hereupon came together [from Demetrius] to him out of pity at the change of his fortune; upon which Demetrius was afraid, and retired out of the country; after which the Jews fought against Alexander, and being beaten, were slain in great numbers in the several battles which they had; and when he had shut up the most powerful of them in the city Bethome, he besieged them therein; and when he had taken the city, and gotten the men into his power, he brought them to Jerusalem, and did one of the most barbarous actions in the world to them; for as he was feasting with his concubines, in the sight of all the city, he ordered about eight hundred of them to be crucified; and while they were living, he ordered the throats of their children and wives to be cut before their eyes
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 11:54 AM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
Unfortunately, IAJ's anecdote is trying to pin on the Romans what a Jewish ruler had done to his fellow Jews:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josephus, Antiquities 13.14.2
Now as Alexander [Jannaeus] fled to the mountains, six thousand of the Jews hereupon came together [from Demetrius] to him out of pity at the change of his fortune; upon which Demetrius was afraid, and retired out of the country; after which the Jews fought against Alexander, and being beaten, were slain in great numbers in the several battles which they had; and when he had shut up the most powerful of them in the city Bethome, he besieged them therein; and when he had taken the city, and gotten the men into his power, he brought them to Jerusalem, and did one of the most barbarous actions in the world to them; for as he was feasting with his concubines, in the sight of all the city, he ordered about eight hundred of them to be crucified; and while they were living, he ordered the throats of their children and wives to be cut before their eyes
Thanks, this explains much, IAJ has also mentioned "up to 800 per day" in another thread.

Concubines can be pretty creepy when they are feasting.
semiopen is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 04:57 PM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by bacht View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post

A reasonably good description. However, because of the mis-rep from Christianity and Islam, the Jewish defense of the right to freedom of belief, which was flaunted by Rome, and impacting only on one nation - remains unrecognised and distorted. This sublime right of humanity was nowhere defended better than by the Jews in 70 CE. The event of 70 CE should be made a pivotal honoring by the world, but is falsely antithetised due to competing agendas.
I kind of agree with this. But the defenders of Jewish liberty in 70 ce were the Zealots, none of whom I would want to meet. They were unprincipled, irreligious and disdainful of any moderation of belief or action.
I don't think they were unprinciple when their situation is regarded. This nation was not about to forego their beliefs - you cannot agree and also qualify this till it is nullified. The Jews had a different belief from Europe and Arabia for 2000 years already, and this is the primal factor here. It is far more precarious to ask Jews to forego their belief than say Christians today demanding this of Islam - at least by the measure of time, dna transmission and the numerous wars of defense already incurred.This forum is engaging in denial.



Quote:

They took the Jews' already shaky reputation among the Hellenistic pagans and brought it even lower. They forced the end of a thousand years of Hebrew tradition by acting like criminals. I suppose one could argue that they enabled God to test his people and preserve a faithful remnant, but this would've been cold comfort to those killed or enslaved.
It is hardly possible to bother about anyone's reputation with the Hellenists - this is the people who instigated the war, antisemitism, Roman hatred and christianity itself. They instigated the thought to Nero the Jews were not honoring Rome with sacrifices, which resulted in Nero's decree, a war which challenged the Jews and caused a holocaust [not nin Europe's radar or its Gospels] and the longest exile in history. The Hellenists never forgave the Jews for refusing to bow to Zeus 250 years before.
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 05:36 PM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by semiopen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
Unfortunately, IAJ's anecdote is trying to pin on the Romans what a Jewish ruler had done to his fellow Jews:
Thanks, this explains much, IAJ has also mentioned "up to 800 per day" in another thread.

Concubines can be pretty creepy when they are feasting.
No it does not. Both the cuncubine report and the 800 per day is in Josephus' WAR WITH THE JEWS, which describes the event around 70 CE. I'll let some posts flow before I dislodge the selective extracts.
IamJoseph is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.