FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2012, 12:23 PM   #51
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
...

The people who advance the theory that Muhammad never existed are the same people who ideologically oppose the traditional beliefs of the religion. ...
Not true.

This theory has been endorsed by a Muslim cleric.

eta: Professor Hired for Outreach to Muslims Delivers a Jolt
Quote:
Muhammad Sven Kalisch, a Muslim convert and Germany's first professor of Islamic theology, fasts during the Muslim holy month, doesn't like to shake hands with Muslim women and has spent years studying Islamic scripture. Islam, he says, guides his life.

So it came as something of a surprise when Prof. Kalisch announced the fruit of his theological research. His conclusion: The Prophet Muhammad probably never existed.
Toto is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:38 PM   #52
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
...

The people who advance the theory that Muhammad never existed are the same people who ideologically oppose the traditional beliefs of the religion. ...
Not true.

This theory has been endorsed by a Muslim cleric.

eta: Professor Hired for Outreach to Muslims Delivers a Jolt
Quote:
Muhammad Sven Kalisch, a Muslim convert and Germany's first professor of Islamic theology, fasts during the Muslim holy month, doesn't like to shake hands with Muslim women and has spent years studying Islamic scripture. Islam, he says, guides his life.

So it came as something of a surprise when Prof. Kalisch announced the fruit of his theological research. His conclusion: The Prophet Muhammad probably never existed.
Yeah, he was actually the guy I had in mind, and that is why I said, "...ideologically oppose the traditional beliefs of the religion."

Read the article further, and you will see what I mean:
He has doubts, too, about the Quran. "God doesn't write books," Prof. Kalisch says.
I take him to be analogous to Robert M. Price. As you have pointed out, Price is a member of a Christian church.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 03:21 PM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Does that apply to Scientology, Abe?

Quote:
Xenu (play /ˈziːnuː/ zee-noo),[1][2][3] also spelled Xemu, was, according to the founder of Scientology L. Ron Hubbard, the dictator of the "Galactic Confederacy" who, 75 million years ago, brought billions[4][5] of his people to Earth in a DC-8-like spacecraft, stacked them around volcanoes and killed them using hydrogen bombs. Official Scientology scriptures hold that the essences of these many people remained, and that they form around people in modern times, causing them spiritual harm.[1

(Courtesy - Wiki )
Minimalist is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 03:23 PM   #54
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Does that apply to Scientology, Abe?

Quote:
Xenu (play /ˈziːnuː/ zee-noo),[1][2][3] also spelled Xemu, was, according to the founder of Scientology L. Ron Hubbard, the dictator of the "Galactic Confederacy" who, 75 million years ago, brought billions[4][5] of his people to Earth in a DC-8-like spacecraft, stacked them around volcanoes and killed them using hydrogen bombs. Official Scientology scriptures hold that the essences of these many people remained, and that they form around people in modern times, causing them spiritual harm.[1

(Courtesy - Wiki )
Yes. Do you have an objection? To review, I said: "...whenever a cult adheres to a reputedly-human founder of the cult, then that person existed, in all cases that we know about. There are no known cases where the reputedly-human founder of the cult existed only as myth."
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 04:04 PM   #55
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 241
Default

L. Ron Hubbard, an American fiction author, did exist.

http://www.lronhubbard.org/biography.html
Pamela Spencer is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 04:28 PM   #56
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Does that apply to Scientology, Abe?




(Courtesy - Wiki )
Yes. Do you have an objection? To review, I said: "...whenever a cult adheres to a reputedly-human founder of the cult, then that person existed, in all cases that we know about. There are no known cases where the reputedly-human founder of the cult existed only as myth."
Well...

except in 3 major cases, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism that rule of thumb is questioned.

I do grant L. Ron Hubbard and would add Joseph Smith as two verifiable human-founders, though.
Grog is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 04:47 PM   #57
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grog View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Yes. Do you have an objection? To review, I said: "...whenever a cult adheres to a reputedly-human founder of the cult, then that person existed, in all cases that we know about. There are no known cases where the reputedly-human founder of the cult existed only as myth."
Well...

except in 3 major cases, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism that rule of thumb is questioned.

I do grant L. Ron Hubbard and would add Joseph Smith as two verifiable human-founders, though.
You can do a search for cults on Google. Some websites maintain a list of cults, many cults have websites, and you can contact a recruiter of the cult by phone. Ask them who their founder is, and you can then find out whether or not that person exists or has existed. For example, the reputedly-human founder of the Unification Church is Sun Myung Moon. This guy is known to exist. If the mythicist theories of either Jesus or Muhammad are plausible, then we should be able to find other cults with a reputedly-human but merely-mythical founder. Some cults really do assert the existence of reputedly-human characters, and some such characters probably did not exist. For example, Mormons believe that the Angel Moroni was once a human being. We can be almost completely certain that Moroni did not really exist. Can we do that with any reputed-human cult founder? If we can not, then why should we give any serious consideration that either Jesus or Muhammad were the reputed-human merely-mythical founders of their respective cults?
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 05:07 PM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default

Hi Apostate Abe,

You may have forgotten that Jesus is only half human. Does that mean that we can be sure that he half existed?

Warmly,

Jay Raskin

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logical View Post
It seems like a forgone conclusion among serious scholars that Moses did not exist. There is some doubt about Jesus. But I've always been under the impression that everyone agrees that Muhammad was a historical figure.

Comments?
The arguments against a historical Muhammad would be about the same as the arguments against a historical Jesus: absence of impartial witnesses, evidence derived exclusively from witnesses of religious tradition, and the extraordinary claims of those traditions.

But Muhammad almost certainly existed for the same reason that Jesus almost certainly existed: whenever a cult adheres to a reputedly-human founder of the cult, then that person existed, in all cases that we know about. There are no known cases where the reputedly-human founder of the cult existed only as myth.

The people who advance the theory that Muhammad never existed are the same people who ideologically oppose the traditional beliefs of the religion. Again, a strong parallel is drawn to the Jesus-minimalists and Christianity. The rest of us need to take seriously the patterns of history, because probability depends largely on plausibility.
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 05:13 PM   #59
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post
Hi Apostate Abe,

You may have forgotten that Jesus is only half human. Does that mean that we can be sure that he half existed?

Warmly,

Jay Raskin
I would say that would still count. However, no Christians I know in either antiquity nor modernity would believe that Jesus is half human. Christians typically define Jesus as both fully-God and fully-man, which is the Christology of the Nicene Creed.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 08:03 PM   #60
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grog View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Yes. Do you have an objection? To review, I said: "...whenever a cult adheres to a reputedly-human founder of the cult, then that person existed, in all cases that we know about. There are no known cases where the reputedly-human founder of the cult existed only as myth."
Well...

except in 3 major cases, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism that rule of thumb is questioned.

I do grant L. Ron Hubbard and would add Joseph Smith as two verifiable human-founders, though.

If Muhammad's being was regarded as fictitious or seriously contested on pragmatic grounds than there should at least exist in circulation historical examples of dissenters (or even a party of rebels) that openly (or covertly, for that matter) challenged Muhammad's existence from roughly around the time period of his origin (give or take a century or two)/(e.g "rogue", or "suppressed" hadith literature elements), or even cross-cultural remnants and/or artifacts that would seem to suggest (otherwise). Instead, we possess a "purported letter sent by Muhammad to Heraclius, emperor of Byzantium", as well as other letters sent to regarded Heads-of-State.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhamma...Heads-of-State

It would be exceedingly difficult, and perhaps relatively counter-intuitive to maintain the physical existence of Jesus based on traditional Islamic sources. Theoretically, Jesus the Christ was raised bodily to heaven, therefore, substantial evidence for Jesus should, in actuality, disprove the very being of the Messiah (unless, you happen to adhere to the Ahmadiyya perspective and/or heterodox Muslim research suggesting the existence of an Eastern Jesus Christ/Saint Issar that traveled to Tibet and was eventually buried at Kashmir at the age of 120 years). Compounding this issue (further) is the Muslim claim, that as an ascetic, Jesus the Christ, possessed two material items, namely, a comb and a jug:

"Jesus, the Messiah, (pbuh) used to take nothing with him but a comb and a jug. The he saw a man combing his beard with his fingers, so he threw away the comb; and he saw another man drinking from a river with the palms of his hands, so he threw away the jug."
[A non-specific hadith concerning Jesus Christ]

Likewise, there are currently no legitimate reasons to dispute the existence of Siddhārtha Gautama, based on traditional sources. He was not an obscure figure, but a well-known Prince from a supposedly noble lineage. The Buddha's father was King Śuddhodana (the leader of Sheikha clan) whose capital was Kapeel.
Pamela Spencer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.