FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-26-2005, 02:33 PM   #41
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesg
Its about the awakening of awareness of something beyond the temporal and our relationship towards that which is beyond.
Correct, and let me add that beyond the flatness of our temporal (or lower) mind are the multiple levels of heaven that we are predestined by. Our world is flat because our lower mind contains only one generation's worth of contributions whereas the heavens is where multiple levels are stacked up for us to recollect for up to One Thousand Years. In other words, that is where the Reign of God is to be found.

So indeed, there is no history in Gen.1, 2 or 3.
Chili is offline  
Old 08-27-2005, 06:09 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
Slow down please. How would you explain that God created the heavens in the plural and earth in the singular?
English is a relatively recent language. What was the first language, that was used by Gott when Er created die Sonne (feminine) and der Mond (masculine) ?

Is it really impossible to say "the heaven" (singular) in english ?
In french we have singular (ciel) and irregular plural (cieux) for "heaven".
Huon is offline  
Old 08-27-2005, 07:51 AM   #43
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

We do not need to worry about that because God speaks English today and all we have to do is let this same God speak through an inspired translator (tm) to bring some sunshine in our life. This will be ours through Mary who is the queen of angels until we, finally if you wish, find favor with her and will be led to our highest of heaven and there crown her queen of heaven and earth.

That is how we arrive at the seventh day where evening did not follow the day and there come full circle with Rev.22:5 where we remain without the need for sunshine in our life.

Of course this may sound like nonsense to some of us but since I did not read this tread I wrote this to add a different point of view to this discussion.
Chili is offline  
Old 08-27-2005, 10:49 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD
I know at times it might seem I need help, but don't presume to help with the elementary basics, unless your a degreed professional, fluent in both the pertinent languages and sociological contours of the ANE.
Never trust anyone who says ANE. It seems to be the current buzzword among apologists at the moment. Not only is it factually incorrect, it's also almost always used inappropriately to the point in question in the vast majority of instances. I spend most Saturday nights in A&E so I know what I'm talking about.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 08-27-2005, 10:52 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon
Is it really impossible to say "the heaven" (singular) in english ?
In french we have singular (ciel) and irregular plural (cieux) for "heaven".
Well that makes sense. You couldn't sell the idea of a single heaven to anybody if they thought they might end up sitting next to the French.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 08-27-2005, 11:26 AM   #46
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boro Nut
Never trust anyone who says ANE.... Not only is it factually incorrect ...
"Anachronistic" might be better. Incidentally, in the interest of promoting Law and Order, A&E ought to be used.
CJD is offline  
Old 08-28-2005, 09:03 AM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJD
Incidentally, in the interest of promoting Law and Order, A&E ought to be used.
Well as it's usually the Police who put me into Accident & Emergency in the first place, you're preaching to the converted, and as I'm usually handcuffed to one of them, I'm wouldn't be in any position to argue otherwise anyway.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 08-28-2005, 11:05 AM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boro Nut
Well that makes sense. You couldn't sell the idea of a single heaven to anybody if they thought they might end up sitting next to the French.

Boro Nut
All the French who are in heaven are packed in a very small corner of one of the many heavens of Chili. So, if one asks politely, he/she will not be installed near these (nevertheless good people, since admitted in the club) Frenchmen.

Most of the French are installed downstairs, in the cave, where it is warm...
Huon is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 01:15 PM   #49
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 44
Default

Thanks for the responses.. Doc Price and I are having a LIVE call-in program this Friday over at: http://www.infidelguy.com to address your criticisms live on the air. Feel free to write down your questions.

Chili, unsure what you mean by "slow down".. accepting criticisms and improving the essay is cause for you to tell me to slow down? Why don't you "calm" down. It's all about learning for me. If I am wrong about a particular position, I have no problems at all correcting myself. As should be obvious by now.

If you do a bit of research, you will discover that the issue about Heavens being plural is not much of an issue. Shamayim is always used in the plural (similar to the way we the English word "fish" looks singular, but can also be plural). Note that this could also be translated as "from the waters" (Compare to Genesis 1:6-8 - let there be a firmament in the midst of the "waters", and let it divide the waters from the waters...
waters unders the firmament and waters above the firmament... and God called the firmament "heaven". See: http://www.sacrednamebible.com/kjvst...EB80.htm#S8064
and also: http://www.hebrewresources.com/discu...st1720001049pm

See also:
http://www.bible.gen.nz/amos/hebrew/mem/mayim.htm
infidelguy is offline  
Old 09-01-2005, 06:07 PM   #50
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infidelguy
Chili, unsure what you mean by "slow down".. accepting criticisms and improving the essay is cause for you to tell me to slow down? Why don't you "calm" down. It's all about learning for me. If I am wrong about a particular position, I have no problems at all correcting myself. As should be obvious by now.
Thanks for your concern but rest assured that I am as calm, cool and collected as I ever was. My suggestion for you to slow down was so you might consider the idea that the book of Genesis has nothing to do with the creation of the Universe and even less with the ancient perspective of the Universe which was new 6000 years ago when the Universe was nearly as old as it is today (give or take 6000 years).
Chili is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:20 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.