FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-19-2007, 06:36 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xoxarle View Post
Isn't it also true that Babel, literally translated, means "confused"? That alone suggests the story was apocryphal.
Not necessarily, unless you can show that it also had that meaning at the time the story is supposed to take place.

For example, the fact that "Lesbian" now means gay woman doesn't mean the island of Lesbos didn't exist--just that it was strongly associated with lesbianism. It's possible that the term became associated with the meaning later as a result of the events that took place, or the story.
chapka is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 09:45 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Evil One View Post
Rather, the text says that Babel failed because the LORD directly intervened to stop it succeeding. In other words, it was not the failure of human utopianism, but divine intervention, that foiled Babel's plans.
If reality follows a pattern of cause and effect, and God is the first cause, then God is the reason for all effects. In an attempt to understand God you study the effects and piece together the pattern. The Story of Babel studies the effect. In classic Mesopotamian fashion, the reason for everything is defined through the will of God. God is the first conspiracy theory.

Conspiracy theories construct a matrix beneath a series of events. They create order out of chaos, which is somehow comforting. Perhaps it is more reassuring to believe that there is an institution pulling strings in the shadows than it is to accept that random terrible things can happen for no reason.
- Alexandra Robbins

But then again science also believes in the conspiracy theory too. But instead of acknowledging an initiator and associating blame they just want to study the pattern.

As has been shown time and again, human utopianism is a failure because it doesn’t bring into account human nature. If all humanity acted as a unified corporate entity then the passage would be true.

Behold, the people are one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.

However, the people are never one. We are never all on the same page, and this is why human utopianism always fails. As a way to explain this the Story of Babel was passed down orally until it was put into the Book of Genesis. Although there was an actual Tower of Babel, what is relevant is the metaphorical Tower of Babel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xoxarle View Post
The existance of modern skyscrapers also prove that God's attempt to foil our grand designs was a miserable failure. Did He not anticipate that we would quickly learn to communicate across language barriers?
And yet there are not any utopian societies that persevere.
Chaupoline is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 10:51 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xoxarle View Post
Isn't it also true that Babel, literally translated, means "confused"? That alone suggests the story was apocryphal.
Actually, this was the basis for my comment about the writers of Genesis and linguistics. The writers associated the word with the Hebrew balal or balbal which means 'to confuse'. They were trying to interpret a foreign word by their own language. The Babylonians wouldn't have seen it that way. In their language Babel means 'Gate of God'.
Weltall is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 11:33 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaupoline View Post
If reality follows a pattern of cause and effect, and God is the first cause, then God is the reason for all effects. In an attempt to understand God you study the effects and piece together the pattern. The Story of Babel studies the effect. In classic Mesopotamian fashion, the reason for everything is defined through the will of God. God is the first conspiracy theory.
Erm, but in the story God directly, and specifically, intervenes. Whether you consider God the "first cause" or not, the text specifically and directly says that God specifically intervenes, in a specific, stated manner, for specific, stated reasons. Meanwhile the supposed fatal flaw of utopianism receives nary a mention. I really don't see how you get past that.

Look, I think the story you've made up about the Inevitable Downfall of the Utopian Movement of Babel is lovely, I really do. Nice little metaphor, has a good moral and a tune you can really dance to.

It's just got nothing to do with the Genesis text, which doesn't mention either utopianism or the reason you propose it always fails. What we see in Genesis is a very clear, very simple just-so story for why people speak different languages.


Quote:
As has been shown time and again, human utopianism is a failure because it doesn’t bring into account human nature. If all humanity acted as a unified corporate entity then the passage would be true.
... so you agree the storyisn't true, then.



Quote:
However, the people are never one. We are never all on the same page, and this is why human utopianism always fails. As a way to explain this the Story of Babel was passed down orally until it was put into the Book of Genesis.
But there's no utopianism in the story. That's something you've made up. So the story can't explain why utopianism fails, because there is no utopianism in it.



Quote:
Although there was an actual Tower of Babel, what is relevant is the metaphorical Tower of Babel..
sounds to me like you want to have it both ways.
The Evil One is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 12:19 PM   #25
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: there
Posts: 250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaupoline View Post
Behold, the people are one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.

However, the people are never one. We are never all on the same page, and this is why human utopianism always fails. As a way to explain this the Story of Babel was passed down orally until it was put into the Book of Genesis. Although there was an actual Tower of Babel, what is relevant is the metaphorical Tower of Babel.
Why did you leave off and ignore the fact that the bible says that the LORD said "Behold, the people are one...". (Gen 11:6)
mefisto is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 02:59 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Evil One View Post
Erm, but in the story God directly, and specifically, intervenes. Whether you consider God the "first cause" or not, the text specifically and directly says that God specifically intervenes, in a specific, stated manner, for specific, stated reasons. Meanwhile the supposed fatal flaw of utopianism receives nary a mention. I really don't see how you get past that.
"4": And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

In the story, the people came from the east and built the city and tower. Let us make us a name (let us act in unison), lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth (otherwise, we are all just individuals looking out for our own interests). Verse 4 is a declaration for unity. It is the classic Together we are strong speech.

This is the point where humanity rallies together in a desire for a utopian society.

"5": And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.
"6": And the LORD said, Behold, the people are one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.

This is the description of the utopian society. The people are one - They act as one corporate entity. They have all one language - They understand one another perfectly, there is no need for lies and coercive tactics to get people to do what they have to do. Now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do - Working together, humans can accomplish anything that they wish to do.

The narrator states what the utopian society is.

"7": Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
"8": So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.

The narrator states that the reason why the utopian society is unsuccessful is because we do not understand one another perfectly and we do not all work together. The people are not one. The blame is placed as coming from God, since God is the initial cause of everything. By blaming God, the narrator is stating this is just the way things are.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Evil One View Post
... so you agree the story isn't true, then.
I think that this story is true, in the sense, that it speaks of reality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Evil One View Post
sounds to me like you want to have it both ways.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mefisto View Post
Why did you leave off and ignore the fact that the bible says that the LORD said "Behold, the people are one...". (Gen 11:6)
I didn’t feel that it was necessary to include that part. Who else would be making that declaration?
Chaupoline is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 04:55 PM   #27
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 162
Default

Quote:
All right, not a whole lot to go on there, but that's the whole tale. Why exactly did God want to fuck up those nice peoples building project?
Why would it be such a bad thing that "nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do"? And why would building a tower to heaven enable them to do any thing they imagined?
Was the intent to reach Heaven, or were they just wanting a high perch to drop water balloons from?
Was God worried that they would actually be pounding on the gates of Heaven if they were allowed to continue?
In Hebrew or Babalonian Cosmology, how high up was the surface of this firmament bowl thing suppossed to be? 1,000 feet? 5,000 cubits?
Who is the 'us' in verse 7? Other gods? Angels?
So after God and his posse come down and fuck every thing up the people just wander off in thousands of directions? They don't try to communicate?
This story is totally fucked.
Well, if one were to allow that this is a figurative "story" from a people who spoke and communicated in figurative ways other than our more literal and so-called rational or enlightened ways; one might be of the opinion that this "story" has much more meaning than---"totally fucked"!

Fundies from all sides never cease to amaze me.
smokester is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 05:33 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaupoline View Post
The narrator states that the reason why the utopian society is unsuccessful is because we do not understand one another perfectly and we do not all work together.
No, the narrator states rather explicitly that the reason why the effort was unsuccessful is because God interfered.

This is eisegesis that has no connection to the text.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 07:19 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
No, the narrator states rather explicitly that the reason why the effort was unsuccessful is because God interfered.

This is eisegesis that has no connection to the text.
I have stated the connection to the text. Your error is in your personification of the character of God. You are simplifying the story to fit your narrow view of God.
Chaupoline is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 09:51 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaupoline View Post
I have stated the connection to the text.
The only connection is in your mind as that is the source of your eisegesis. The text clearly does not say what you claim it says.

Quote:
Your error is in your personification of the character of God. You are simplifying the story to fit your narrow view of God.
My "view of God" here is entirely dependent upon the text being discussed.
Amaleq13 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:00 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.