FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2006, 04:54 AM   #81
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Burlington, Vermont
Posts: 5,179
Default oops!

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.C.Carlson
I have not watched this episode (or show, but I want to now), but according to this web page, it had the following plot:



Change Shakespeare to Jesus, and we're getting into Da Vinci Code territory.

Stephen Carlson
Nope, my memory has betrayed me again. I remember that episode. It argues that Shakespeare came to America, and the evil genius behind the manuscript says, at one point, "You see now why this manuscript is worth any number of lives." So, I"ll go back and look again. Sorry for the false scent.
EthnAlln is offline  
Old 05-19-2006, 05:02 AM   #82
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151
UNfortunately, all Dan Brown does is perpetuate the Jesus Myth instead of truely criticize it in a scholarly way.

He isn't claiming that he's trying to criticise it in a scholarly way though. He's a fiction writer - why would you expect anything more?
purple_kathryn is offline  
Old 05-19-2006, 08:38 AM   #83
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 215
Default

Erm, having gone back to remind myself what we were talking about, I'm inclined to say that the theory that the authors of HBHG got their idea from The Name of the Game won't wash. They're all British, and we never got that series as far as I know. I do know a fair amount of TV history and I'd never even heard of this programme before.

Quote:
Scofield bases his work on John's Gospel, the least reliable of the four historically). It might have worked, Scofield argues, except for the spear in the side, which was a serious wound. Jesus was taken down, but when his rescuers came to revive him during the night, they found that he had succumbed to the wound, so they hid the body away and spread the story that he had been resurrected. Well, it's as plausible to me as what is in the Gospel. Scofield points out what is glaringly obvious: that the "appearance" of Jesus to the disciples on the road to Emmaeus was in fact not Jesus at all.
I'd heard of The Passover Plot but had never read it. What a strange theory! Jesus ordering events in order not to die, but then dies anyway! Could that be because as recently as the late 1960s (when, for instance, you couldn't even show an interracial kiss on TV) a Jewish author writing a book "naturalistically" explaining the Resurrection would leave Scofield liable to get lynched?
The Bishop is offline  
Old 05-19-2006, 08:43 AM   #84
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151
Unfortunately, all Dan Brown does is perpetuate the Jesus Myth instead of truly criticize it in a scholarly way.

Dan Brown did for Jesus criticism what Dover School Board did for Intelligent Design (except in this case Jesus criticism is legitimate). Basically, he has thrown up a big load of really, really bad and unsupported claims that are easily refuted, when the "real truth", is the opposite of what Dan Brown is claiming.

Brown is claiming that Jesus was "all man" and that we have all of this detailed record of his life and whatnot, instead of claming that Jesus is all myth and that we have no legitimate record of his existance.
I wouldn't say that was an entirely fair characterisation. First of all, it's perfectly possible that Brown has never even heard of the Jesus Myth theory. Secondly, the MJ is far easier to dismiss on grounds that everybody here knows are specious or uninformed, but frankly not many general readers are as well versed in skeptical thinking as the majority on the boards here. So, it would be equally controversial, but he might well feel that he would look foolish if he promulgated a theory that was as outside the box as MJ is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151
Basically:

Traditional Chrstianity:

Canon = True
Apocrypha = False

Dan Brown:

Canon = False
Apocrypha = True
That is a perfect representation, not only of Dan Brown's delineation of facts, but of conspiracy theories in general. Nicely done!
The Bishop is offline  
Old 05-19-2006, 08:57 AM   #85
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bishop
Erm, having gone back to remind myself what we were talking about, I'm inclined to say that the theory that the authors of HBHG got their idea from The Name of the Game won't wash. They're all British, and we never got that series as far as I know. I do know a fair amount of TV history and I'd never even heard of this programme before.
The "Name of the Game" similarity is looking more remote to me too, and in some respects it is more similar to the DVC plot than HBHG. However, the main author of HBHG, Richard Leigh, is American. This is from the judicial opinion in the Baigent & Leigh v. Random House case:

Quote:
8. Mr Leigh was born in New Jersey and after secondary education completed a BA in English Literature at Tufts University Boston. He became interested in the Grail Romances whilst an undergraduate and also steeped himself in comparative religions. Thereafter he completed an MA at the University of Chicago in comparative literature and studied for a PHD at the State University of New York. After various part time teaching jobs he moved to London so as to be able to maintain the lifestyle that he wanted (he describes it as genteel bohemianism). There he met Henry Lincoln at a lecture course held at the Wrekin Trust Summer School. During those lectures Henry Lincoln digressed about a village in the South of France called “Rennes-le-Chateau” and the mystery relating to the village. This led to Henry Lincoln showing to Mr Leigh a key document used for the writing of HBHG the “Dossiers Secrets”. It was this document and its possible link to the Templars that interested Mr Baigent and led to the three of them collaborating in producing HBHG.

9. HBHG was written mostly by Mr Leigh. He had the benefit of input of research from Mr Baigent and discussions with him and Henry Lincoln.
As best I can tell, Leigh was 28 years old in 1971, when the show aired, which should be right around the time he would have earned his Ph.D. in comparative literature.

Stephen Carlson
S.C.Carlson is offline  
Old 05-19-2006, 09:37 AM   #86
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 215
Default

I was obviously misinformed about Richard Leigh. His getting the idea from a TV show does still seem remote, however! Thanks for the update.
The Bishop is offline  
Old 05-20-2006, 05:54 AM   #87
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johno

Of course the whole beginning is nonsense anyway. When I accidentally set off the alarms in the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam I merely leant across a silken rope, and just touched the wall beside the Vermeer that I wanted to look closely at. Alarms in internationally important museums of art respond to potential attempted theft long before anybody has pulled anything off a wall.

johno

Exception: the Isabella Stewart Gardner in Boston, home to hundreds of Rennaissance, Asian and Impressionist works, including what is considered by many to be Boston's most important artwork, The Rape of Europa by Titian, was easily robbed of two large Rembrandts, a Vermeer and several smaller pieces by Degas in 1990. Here is a list of other late 20th century robbberies:

http://www.theage.com.au/news/arts/w...18.html?page=2
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 05-20-2006, 06:14 AM   #88
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

Has anyone here seen the movie yet? I saw it yesterday at noon.

In the movie, Teabing's car is a Hummer. Perhaps the gentleman who protrayed him, Sir Ian McKellan, objected to his character owning a stretch Jaguar? The vehicle does some off road traveling in a chase scene, dealing with the bumpy terrain perhaps better than a Jag would.


The theater was about 1/3 full.

Contrary to the majority of reviewers, liked it. I loved the acting of Hanks, Jean Reno (the cop), Paul Bettany (the albino, hubba hubba for the nude flagellation scenes), and esp Ian McKellan. McK was funny and passionate and really added a spark.

Tatou sucked. She phoned it in. But I don't know if it was her fault. Probably Howards' fault, to be reverent towards the heir of Christ. So, she was just boring.

Also, I don't know if she is 29, but she looked about 21 and much much too young. They seemed to have a father/daughter relationship going on. In the book, he has a crush on her! Again, a toning down for the religous backlash prevention?

Hanks was yummy and sincere as usual. He even had a shirtless scene at the end. But he was too dour, I think this was the director's fault again, b/c we know Hanks can be very twinkly. He should have been allowed more humor and personality, and flirtatiousness instead of always being "pursued" and "figuring out clues."

Besides the acting, the pacing was good, I didn't think it was overly talky. They did a great job with Silas, showing his history in flashbacks. The intrigue and plot twists were good, occ confusing.

The art in the Louvre and the Vatican was a joy to behold.

The very last scene was anti-climactic.

So, I'd give it about an 80%, personal grade, as I have an interest in the subject. It could have been much edgier, like Last Temptation...
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 05-20-2006, 10:16 AM   #89
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johno
It should be clear from the discussions that we are having that English and American are different languages


EDIT: Actually, if 'American' and English are two different languages, why the hell are you bitching about the poor English in which it's written? Do you occasionally pick up German novels and offer up similar complaints? Spanish novels?

Quote:
Originally Posted by johno
I do find it difficult to tease Americans. Perhaps you believe that the sentences I was deriding are unimprovable. Is that your position?
I don't have a horse in this race, as I trudged through DVC rather joylessly, and failed to pass page 100 of Angels and Demons. But frankly, your two rewrites were total shit, and a great deal worse than Brown's already medicore passage. Wipe off your goddamn monocle and reread that crap. It's terrible. Even, I might say, to the point of vulgarity. Of course, I can only understand "American" and a fair amount of German. Perhaps Count Johno's novels sell in the tens of thousands in the UK, but to my uncivilized eye, I could have eaten some Alpha-Bits (a once popular Yank cereal) and shat out two better paragraphs.

Of course, you don't have to be a writer to criticize (<--"American" for "criticise", according to my Asshole's American-English English-American dictionary), but why embarrass yourself like that and damage your argument in the process?

But again,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magdlyn
Has anyone here seen the movie yet? I saw it yesterday at noon.
Yeah, I thought it was okay. It was actually quite good for about 90 minutes, but then it hit a wall somewhere and dragged a bit. I too enjoyed Hanks--a great deal, surprisingly--but I'm not sure his character is the guy that should lead a summer blockbuster. But I guess it worked.

That ending though. God, it was Return of the King all over again. ROLL CREDITS!!!
Aumgn is offline  
Old 05-21-2006, 04:45 AM   #90
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aumgn
Yeah, I thought it was okay. It was actually quite good for about 90 minutes, but then it hit a wall somewhere and dragged a bit. I too enjoyed Hanks--a great deal, surprisingly--but I'm not sure his character is the guy that should lead a summer blockbuster. But I guess it worked.
No, Hanks is the anti-Cruise. The Everyman, the Nice Guy, the Respected and Popular Multiple Oscar winner, star of many blockbusters (Big, Gump, Private Ryan and others) and Important and Moving Films (Philadelphia, Apollo 13, Castaway, etc) as well as charming comedies and even animated films for the kids! Married for 15 yrs to the same woman. Perfect choice for a controversial movie.
Magdlyn is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.