FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2003, 03:59 PM   #41
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Adora
[B]I'll repeat it again people.

[b] The Sumerians Got There First
While we are on Sumer, if one can get hold of Samuel Noah Kramer's "History Begins at Sumer", he'll give you the reason for the first woman's name and thus tell you why Eve was created out of Adam's rib.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 04:00 PM   #42
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Philosoft: from your OP, and your subsequent example of some argument of Biff the Unclean's.

It looks for all the world like you are criticizing Biff for his alleged dismissal of the validity of the entire Bible based on specific inconsistencies, while you proclaim the truth of the Genesis account based on specific accuracies. I assume there's a perfectly good explanation for this?
I'm not criticizing Biff for his dismissal of the validity of the entire Bible based on Genesis. If Genesis in fact is unbelievable I would find the rest of the Bible to be unbelievable. I think you're giving me too much credit for having some kind of master plan. All I really wanted to do was answer the criticisms of Genesis which I can see now for the most part I am unprepared to do.

Quote:
PTET: When anyone else on this board uses the term "myth", we mean (something like) a fictionalized history, which evolved over time from primitive understandings and guesswork about the Universe, over hundreds of years. If you will not accept a reasonable or dictionary definition of the word "myth", then we might as well give up talking to you.
Ok, fine, that's what a myth is. I really did not intend for this to the focus of the discussion. Maybe I said some things I shouldn't have. Surely you can't deny that the general sentiment around here is that Genesis is "pure fiction." And thanks for the "facts to consider," I will consider them. I've never considered myself among the hard-line crowd that knows exactly how old the earth is. Admittedly I haven't done the research into this area I probably should. I think I will do that in the future.

Quote:
Asha'man: To deny this is to deny reality, and to demonstrate complete ignorance of these fields of science.

But this is exactly what you seem to be doing, isn’t it? If there is a conflict between your book and reality, you side with your book. Well, that’s fine, but you can’t then claim that there isn’t a conflict at the same time, now can you? It’s very clear that there is a conflict, and that’s the root of the whole problem.
I'll be sure to investigate that for myself in the future. I am yet to hear evidence to convince me that we can really know how old the universe is but that might be because I have not listened to the right people. Honestly, I will try to find time to investigate this for myself.

Quote:
Doctor X: "A cry from the wilderness. . . ."

Perchance . . . more a "whine."
Yeah, sorry I don't really like you. I'm not Magus, stop treating me like him. My name is Mike, nice to meet you.

Quote:
Hawkingfan: It is pointless to reword the entire first Chapter in the second Chapter, while only adding details to it. Especially when it's so confusing to do so. An omnipotent god could have and should have known better. Adam could have easily named the beasts in Chapter 1. The two chapters should have been merged into one, consistent storyline. But no, you deny the obvious--these are two different accounts written by two different people (they even use different names for God throughout their respective accounts) that were borrowed from the same myth.
If you're not reading Genesis for the purpose of finding flaws it makes perfect sense. The first chapter describes the process. The second is more focused on the garden and what happened there.

Quote:
Adora: Mike, if you spent the time and effort you waste debating these issues on utterly petty and shallow levels actually on researching the truth behind Judaeo-Christian cosmology (and therefore creation myths) it wouldn't take you that long to realise that, well, they just ripped off the Sumerians.
You're right, I haven't researched a lot of this as much as it appears many of you have. I'm simply not equipped to speak with you all about things that I don't know that much about. I think I'll leave this stuff for the Genuine Scienticians (tm). Sorry to bail on some of this but you all have made it obvious to me that I am unequipped on this front. You'll probably never let me live this down but I can only be honest.
Mike(ATL) is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 04:13 PM   #43
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

You'll probably never let me live this down but I can only be honest.

I think you'll find such honesty to be highly respected for the most part around here.

I, for one, commend your honesty.
Mageth is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 04:24 PM   #44
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spin
While we are on Sumer, if one can get hold of Samuel Noah Kramer's "History Begins at Sumer", he'll give you the reason for the first woman's name and thus tell you why Eve was created out of Adam's rib.


spin
History Begins at Sumer - out of print but some cheap used copies

also by the same author

The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character

History Begins at Sumer: Thirty-Nine "Firsts" in Recorded History
Toto is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 04:27 PM   #45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Quote:
Yeah, sorry I don't really like you.
"Slings and arrows . . . slings and arrows!"

"How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless child!"

[Cue violins.--Ed.]

Here I try to impart kind remonstration, direction towards true gnosis, an appreciation of finer things, and a recognition of the abomination that is country-western music.

Yet are my nice labours scorn'd and besmirch'd! Directs Seed to bring him his hanky and stuffed Scrat-doll for comfort.

Quote:
I'm not Magus, stop treating me like him.
Then one would do well to cease behaving like Magus.

I rais'd the specter of Magus in reference to a challenge I gave him . . . and then passed to this individual. Perchance "challenge" was the wrong word, carrying with it a connotation of conflict. Basically, I wish'd Magus to attack the evidence specifically. I carried on this wish for this individual. That he scorneth my kind concern . . . my hopes . . . dreams . . . and fantasies [Stop that.--Ed.] is . . . like . . . really not nice.

To Reiterate:

The individual confesses ignorance of the basics of science and biblical scholarship. Fair enough. Posters have refer'd him to rather concise and clear basics to remedy this ignorance. I would think, then, prior to becoming petulent and continuing to make sweeping generalization, the individual would avail himself of these references.

The issue with Magus is that--given these references--often posted with excruciating detail--he ignores them. If the individual does not wish to be perceived as that he would do well to behave otherwise.

Again, [ZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZzzz.--Ed.] he may, indeed, read Who Wrote the Bible? and declare the whole multi-authorship theory a crock, but at least he would be able to address/refute/attack the evidence.

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 04:28 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike(ATL)
You're right, I haven't researched a lot of this as much as it appears many of you have. I'm simply not equipped to speak with you all about things that I don't know that much about. I think I'll leave this stuff for the Genuine Scienticians (tm). Sorry to bail on some of this but you all have made it obvious to me that I am unequipped on this front. You'll probably never let me live this down but I can only be honest.
Would this perchance mean that you will cease and desist from witnessing and evangelizing to unbelievers until you have actually researched the claims of your religion?

I s'pose that would be too much to ask...
Kosh is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 04:36 PM   #47
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

As always, trust a Vorlon to make the point succinctly. . . .

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 04:51 PM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mageth
I think you'll find such honesty to be highly respected for the most part around here.

I, for one, commend your honesty.
I must concur. We tend to appreciate the ability to admit error, as it seems to be a rare thing, indeed.
Philosoft is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 05:18 PM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool Age of the Universe

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike(ATL)
I'll be sure to investigate that for myself in the future. I am yet to hear evidence to convince me that we can really know how old the universe is but that might be because I have not listened to the right people. Honestly, I will try to find time to investigate this for myself.
Talk to some actual astronomers, since they are the experts in this stuff. Read a textbook on astronomy. Watch the science news.
Pictures of the young universe
Trace gas dates Universe’s first stars
Fading White Dwarfs
I’ve always found this to be fascinating stuff, and could read up on it all day long.

Astronomy starts out as a very difficult science, since you can’t experiment, only observe. But if you are careful and exacting about your observations, it’s amazing what you can learn. Don’t ever fall into the trap of thinking it isn’t science because it isn’t in a laboratory, astronomers can still make predictions about what they will see, or won’t see, and test those predictions. That is the true test of any science, the ability to make accurate predictions about what you can see, and astronomy is very strong in that area.

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike(ATL)
If you're not reading Genesis for the purpose of finding flaws it makes perfect sense. The first chapter describes the process. The second is more focused on the garden and what happened there.
Actually, if you already know a little bit about cosmology, astronomy, or basics of science, then the flaws just jump right out at you, and you can’t even continue. I knew Genesis was a myth the first time I ever read it, because I had an interest in astronomy since 2nd grade. It didn’t bother me at the time since I had a very liberal Christian theology. It’s called “suspension of disbelief,” like when you are watching a movie. You know it isn’t real, but it still makes a good story. However, if the errors get too big to ignore, the whole thing comes crashing down.

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike(ATL)
You're right, I haven't researched a lot of this as much as it appears many of you have. I'm simply not equipped to speak with you all about things that I don't know that much about. I think I'll leave this stuff for the Genuine Scienticians (tm). Sorry to bail on some of this but you all have made it obvious to me that I am unequipped on this front. You'll probably never let me live this down but I can only be honest.
Actually, I have a great deal of respect for someone who can admit ignorance. The good news is that ignorance has an easy cure: learning. I have learned a great deal here just by hanging around listening, and occasionally asking questions. I have learned how badly the Bible represents reality. I knew it had flaws, but I never knew how many.

Instead of issuing challenges, hang around and ask questions. Don’t tell us that science supports the bible, ask us where we have found problems. Don’t try to defend your beliefs, simply try to expand your knowledge. We love that type of attitude, and you will find this a much friendlier place to be, and more informative, even for a theist.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 11-21-2003, 05:24 PM   #50
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto
History Begins at Sumer - out of print but some cheap used copies

also by the same author

The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character

History Begins at Sumer: Thirty-Nine "Firsts" in Recorded History
Ta. I can only fire on memory at the moment. The last one seems to be the same book. I have the out of print edition elsewhere and its chapters all read "The First [something or other]".


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.