Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-18-2005, 10:38 PM | #71 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
Quote:
I find it intriguing because it corresponds to the way I live and think. It needs to be tested against revealed theology. I have not yet done that but others have attempted it and stand against it. I know I may be on shaky ground. |
||
12-19-2005, 07:42 AM | #72 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
Quote:
Am I reading you correctly? |
|
12-19-2005, 10:52 AM | #73 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 196
|
Does God know the future?
Quote:
I am saying that there is part of the future that God may not know. This implies that God may be temporal in the sense that he experiences time as a sequence of events. This seems most critical in relationships . It is hard for me to conceive of a relationship without a sequence of encounters that express the relationship. The part of the future that God does not know could be these relational encounters. This enables God to experience joy when I express my love and gratitude toward him and a sense of sadness when I do something to harm myself, others, or his reputation. I am not sure if God could be awestruck but I think he is often pleasantly surprised. |
||
12-19-2005, 06:34 PM | #74 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
Quote:
That solves a lot of problems faced by most theists, but it does reduce god to a kind of superman. More powerful than ordinary human beings, able to leap tall buildings, providing they aren't too tall. Am I misrepresenting the god you believe in? I'm looking forward to your answer. |
|
12-20-2005, 03:08 PM | #75 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
I was taught that everyone who lived who hasn't heard of jesus will be resurrected as themselves in physical form and then be given the opportunity to accept jesus. Obviously pro forma for old abe, moses, david and the lot. Aborted babies would be grown (in vast fields, matrix style?) to the point they could understand, muslims, taoists, zoroastrianists, etc., would be given the NT news and all would be well. So, you see, it is possible for those who lived before jesus to believe in jesus and his message and premise 2 is false. Can this be supported by bible verses? Don't know, although I do remember two hour services, so I'm sure they used that time to wrangle a lot of verses in support. I could probably dig up an old Herbert W. Armstrong booklet on the topic. I just noticed you used was instead of is in premise 2. Maybe this makes my attack fail. I don't know, I took informal logic. |
|
12-21-2005, 08:48 AM | #76 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
I don't think it reduces God to a superman. In my odd way of thinking, it actually makes him more powerful. Instead of having to directly control everything to make sure things turn out the way he wants, he allows unpredictable events, limits his direct control, and still achieves the ends. It seems this takes much more wisdom and power. The biblical accounts are more in line with God responding to the unpredictable choices of people. The aquatic creature in Jonah looks like a plan B to get Jonah back on track. Jesus' ministry seemed like random personal encounters highly dependent on the faith of the people involved. Meekness is a highly valued biblical trait. It is strength that allows itself to appear as weak. It is a father wrestling with his 5-year-old allowing himself to be pinned. There is no weakness. It is power that allows itself to be mastered because of its self-assurance. God doesn't need to know the future to know everything. He knows all that is knowable. That is enough. If you need an omni-type explanation: God could know and experience the future but perhaps he chooses not to so that his relationships can be real, love can be voluntary, and our choices are undetermined. This makes him greater, not less than we usually think. |
|
12-21-2005, 06:18 PM | #77 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
Quote:
Your god begins to sound like a young child at a horror movie who hides behind his hands, but peeks through every so often. I sure can't see how god's refusal to see what is there makes him greater. Can I have a bit more explanation? |
|
12-21-2005, 10:18 PM | #78 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 196
|
God is greater in this scenario because he is not required to control the details to accomplish his long range purposes. He is able work together infinite uncontrolled variables to accomplish his goals. This includes permitting harm to occur with the option to transform intended evil to good ends. A lesser god would require control over all the details to accomplish his purposes. A lesser god may even feel compelled to restrict all evil for fear of being blamed for it.
I prefer to postulate that any lack of knowledge about the future is a self-imposed limitation. This insulates the position from the charge of making God something less than omniscient or eternal. Jesus' incarnation seems to be a good illustration about how God can be self-limiting. The idea of incarnation includes the temporary suspension of the Son's independent use of his divine attributes. Jesus lived his life with the abilities of a man empowered by the Holy Spirit, not as God walking on earth. The ultimate self-limitation was being vulnerable to die. The motive for all this was for relationships. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|