FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-23-2012, 11:44 AM   #31
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NW United States
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
The apologists attributed to the second century already mention texts to be considered a canon of writings for the Christian "Church" but NEVER (not even once) do any of them tell us WHO decided what was to become official AND HOLY WRIT ("New Testament"). There was no Pope, no Vatican, no official Board or Committee back in the second century.

So WHO authorized these writers to state what is a Christian canon in the second century if in fact these gentlemen were merely "freelancers" in terms of teaching theology and doctrine. These were people whose lives are virtually UNKNOWN even according to our friend Eusebius. There was no central Christian authority until the Constantinian regime to establish such things.

Furthermore, IF they already had their "canon" from a "second century" Irenaeus, then why was it necessary for one Athanasius TWO HUNDRED years later to specify the "canon" of the New Testament?!

In chronological order you can point to: (unknown) Irenaeus, (unknown) Tertullian, (unknown) Origen all the way to Athanasius, considered by many as the "father of the canon." And since when would a major tenet of the faith be recorded merely in a festal letter by a single individual bishop?!

If so, who appointed Athanasius the "father of the canon," and why wouldn't second-century-Irenaeus enjoy that title, or for that matter the original apostles according to traditional teaching?!
The same people that approved and authorized Josephus to write Wars Of The Jews. The Romans had him write a true account of what happened and then created a fictional account to show that the christ was divine(Roman Emperor).
The Romans had the authority to do this because God had gone over to Rome as Josephus tell us.

that's how i see it maybe
jdboy is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 12:04 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Price has a lot more credibility around here than you do.
in a known myther forum??? really ???
outhouse is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 12:06 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio Parker View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
exactly why Price has no credibility

not only does that not fly, it creates more unanswerable questions then it answers.

some of the worst scholarly work ive ever read, sounds more like a internet blogger then a scholar.
You do realize that it's not Price's thesis?

exactly

it is his review I believe, im having issues with
outhouse is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 12:27 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Aha, now we are getting somewhere. The logical imperative makes it MORE LIKELY texts emerged in the environment of the new regime than in a state of obscurity. Mountainman, are you around??? Shesh??
For what it's worth, I could never be convinced that everything written in the name of Josephus originated from the time after the destruction of Jerusalem and were not interpolated by creative church writers. For example, the legends of Massada for example........

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdboy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
The apologists attributed to the second century already mention texts to be considered a canon of writings for the Christian "Church" but NEVER (not even once) do any of them tell us WHO decided what was to become official AND HOLY WRIT ("New Testament"). There was no Pope, no Vatican, no official Board or Committee back in the second century.

So WHO authorized these writers to state what is a Christian canon in the second century if in fact these gentlemen were merely "freelancers" in terms of teaching theology and doctrine. These were people whose lives are virtually UNKNOWN even according to our friend Eusebius. There was no central Christian authority until the Constantinian regime to establish such things.

Furthermore, IF they already had their "canon" from a "second century" Irenaeus, then why was it necessary for one Athanasius TWO HUNDRED years later to specify the "canon" of the New Testament?!

In chronological order you can point to: (unknown) Irenaeus, (unknown) Tertullian, (unknown) Origen all the way to Athanasius, considered by many as the "father of the canon." And since when would a major tenet of the faith be recorded merely in a festal letter by a single individual bishop?!

If so, who appointed Athanasius the "father of the canon," and why wouldn't second-century-Irenaeus enjoy that title, or for that matter the original apostles according to traditional teaching?!
The same people that approved and authorized Josephus to write Wars Of The Jews. The Romans had him write a true account of what happened and then created a fictional account to show that the christ was divine(Roman Emperor).
The Romans had the authority to do this because God had gone over to Rome as Josephus tell us.

that's how i see it maybe
Duvduv is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 01:24 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
However, there is evidence of any 2nd century individual in a Christian environment carrying so much weight that he could edit an entire body of texts, ascribe sacred status to it alongside the Old Testament, and that clergy and followers all over started obeying him.
Perhaps that is the perception desired and generated by later authorities ie that a high degree of central control existed when it did not.

Maybe the early canon was less authoritative than it now appears. But the difference would be that the competing versions are no longer available.
Horatio Parker is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 01:36 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio Parker View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
However, there is evidence of any 2nd century individual in a Christian environment carrying so much weight that he could edit an entire body of texts, ascribe sacred status to it alongside the Old Testament, and that clergy and followers all over started obeying him.
Perhaps that is the perception desired and generated by later authorities ie that a high degree of central control existed when it did not.

Maybe the early canon was less authoritative than it now appears. But the difference would be that the competing versions are no longer available.

ding ding ding

we have a winner.

and thats how it should be viewed
outhouse is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 01:50 PM   #37
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
ding ding ding

we have a winner.

and thats how it should be viewed
I'll take my prize in cash, thanks.

Just trying to reconcile the evidence....
Horatio Parker is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 03:11 PM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio Parker View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
ding ding ding

we have a winner.

and thats how it should be viewed
I'll take my prize in cash, thanks.

Just trying to reconcile the evidence....

you get green X's instead of cash LOL

thats what some of us are trying to do. My issue is with the refusal or perversion of evidence.
outhouse is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 04:08 PM   #39
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NW United States
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
Aha, now we are getting somewhere. The logical imperative makes it MORE LIKELY texts emerged in the environment of the new regime than in a state of obscurity. Mountainman, are you around??? Shesh??
For what it's worth, I could never be convinced that everything written in the name of Josephus originated from the time after the destruction of Jerusalem and were not interpolated by creative church writers. For example, the legends of Massada for example........

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdboy View Post
The same people that approved and authorized Josephus to write Wars Of The Jews. The Romans had him write a true account of what happened and then created a fictional account to show that the christ was divine(Roman Emperor).
The Romans had the authority to do this because God had gone over to Rome as Josephus tell us.

that's how i see it maybe
Yes, Josephus and Luke both claim to have perfect understanding of the events and the correct order of presentation.

Josephus claims the Romans locked up the torah. Jesus makes the same claim,
he is sealing up visions and prophecies.

Jesus claims authority from God and Josephus tells us God is with Rome.

Here is jesus a high priest going over to the Romans. Caesar promises to restore jesus and others to what they had.
WOTJ Bk 6 ch2.2
"fled to the Romans, of whom were the [high priests] Joseph and Jesus, and of the sons of [high priests] I have already related; many also of the other
nobility went over to the Romans."

Interestingly the seditious jews claimed that the romans killed jesus but Josephus says it was a trick to keep others from deserting. Now we see the trick(reversed) played out in the bible where the romans faked his death and had jesus reappear to others that were going over to the romans

"Some also there were who, watching a proper opportunity when they might quietly get away, fled to the Romans, of whom were the [high priests] Joseph and Jesus, and of the sons of [high priests] three, whose father was Ishmael, who was beheaded in Cyrene, and four sons of Matthias, as also one son of the other Matthias, who ran away after his father's death, (9) and whose father was slain by Simon the son of Gioras, with three of his sons, as I have already related; many also of the other nobility went over to the Romans, together with the [high priests]. Now Caesar not only received these men very kindly in other respects, but, knowing they would not willingly live after the customs of other nations, he sent them to Gophna, and desired them to remain there for the present, and told them, that when he was gotten clear of this war, he would restore each of them to their possessions again; so they cheerfully retired to that small city which was allotted them, without fear of any danger. But as they did not appear, the seditious gave out again that these deserters were slain by the Romans, which was done in order to deter the rest from running away, by fear of the like treatment. This trick of theirs succeeded now for a while, as did the like trick before; for the rest were hereby deterred from deserting, by fear of the like treatment."
jdboy is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 04:39 PM   #40
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio Parker View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
However, there is evidence of any 2nd century individual in a Christian environment carrying so much weight that he could edit an entire body of texts, ascribe sacred status to it alongside the Old Testament, and that clergy and followers all over started obeying him.
Perhaps that is the perception desired and generated by later authorities ie that a high degree of central control existed when it did not.

Maybe the early canon was less authoritative than it now appears. But the difference would be that the competing versions are no longer available.
Yes, this is essentially what people have been saying all along. I don't know why Duvduv has such a problem with the idea.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.