FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-14-2007, 01:49 PM   #111
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Do you know who Ebion is? I have mentioned him a number of times on this forum. Take a moment to look him up and answer the question I put to you in my first response to your comments.
*Yawn* And as others have pointed out in response to your cracked-record question, Ebion wasn't believed to have existed by the Ebionites. That's where your false analogy wobbles, wavers, falls over and falls apart.

Get a new argument spin.
Antipope Innocent II is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 01:55 PM   #112
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlDoherty View Post
OK, but this doesn't tell me what he said. Or perhaps you don't know. (Or are you trying to spare me? )

Earl Doherty
The relevant part of the quote reads
Quote:
In addition to the following books by the most visible contemporary champion of the myth theory, the Bristish scholar G A Wells a number of older studies can be recommended. Of Wells' many titles The Jesus of the Early Christians (or via: amazon.co.uk) (London: Pemberton 1971) is the most tightly argued; Did Jesus Exist ? (or via: amazon.co.uk) (London: Pemberton 1986) is also worth reading as is The Historical Evidence for Jesus (or via: amazon.co.uk) (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books 1988). A "disciple" of Wells , Earl Doherty, has rehashed many of the former's views in The Jesus Puzzle (Age of Reason Publications, 2005) which is qualitatively and academically far inferior to anything so far written on the subject. Of older works worth consulting .....
Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 09:49 PM   #113
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewCriddle
The relevant part of the quote reads...
Well, I did ask. Thanks Andrew.

"...anything so far written on the subject." I wonder what this includes? Wells himself, presumably, but who else? Is he going back as far as Couchoud, who was the last major and 'quality' writer (in the 20s) on mythicism before Wells? Are Acharya and Freke/Gandy or Ellegard (remember him?) since Wells to be considered "superior"? Who knows?

Personally, I think, like all scholars (and that even included Richard Carrier in his 2002 review of my book, who complained about my lack of "polish according to existing conventions"), Hoffman doesn't like my non-academic style and layperson target. I don't use enough jargon and don't spruce up my stuff with scholarly paraphernalia. On the other hand, I wonder if he actually read the book. I would dispute that I have simply "rehashed" much of Wells. My case is vastly different from that of Wells and I borrowed virtually nothing but a few minor points relating to very secondary subjects from him.

Anyway, I think his attitude would rule out any invitation to take part in The Project.

Earl Doherty
EarlDoherty is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:19 PM   #114
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
Default

Kind of related: "Jesus: Myth or History?" by Archibald Robertson is an interesting and somewhat sympathetic (if critical) history of the mythicist case, written in 1946. It's out of print, though.

Regarding Doherty's comment above, I would think that Price also has "written on the subject," even if he does not commit to ahistoricity.
Zeichman is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 07:16 AM   #115
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeichman
Regarding Doherty's comment above, I would think that Price also has "written on the subject," even if he does not commit to ahistoricity.
I have often said that if Bob Price would "commit" himself to mythicism, he would take over the #1 spot overnight--although I think he is a bit hamstrung by his commitment to total Pauline inauthenticity. Not that the latter would make mythicism less possible (hardly), but that without some Pauline authenticity in the first century, it is much more difficult to demonstrate mythicism.

I also happen to think that he is wrong in that regard, and my latest study of the Epistle to the Hebrews I think helps demonstrate that. This was to have been part of my revision of The Jesus Puzzle, but my preparatory 'essay' on that chapter turned out to be so detailed and comprehensive, with a lot of new ideas, that I have ended up with a 35,000 word treatise on the epistle, which is far too long for the book. So I will be posting it in about a week or so on the website, and will later condense it for the book. I will say right now that I think this study shows beyond the shadow of a doubt that Hebrews knows no historical Jesus--and by extension, it vastly strengthens the same case for the early record in general. (As well as provides a corollary argument for some Pauline authenticity.) I’d be willing to stand or fall on this study.

Incidentally, speaking of Hoffman and Price, since Hoffman dumped on the quality of my book, I guess he doesn't think too highly of Price's judgment, since Price included a very favorable quote for the cover of the Jesus Puzzle:

"A great book! I can only say I felt like the disciples on the road to Emmaus. 'Did our hearts not burn within us as he opened the scriptures to us?' "

I think it may be the case that Hoffman never picked up the book, let alone read it.

Earl Doherty
EarlDoherty is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 06:52 PM   #116
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Music City
Posts: 19
Default Slightly off subject

Earl,

I have enjoyed your website and plan to get your book. Thanks for all you are doing.

The "Fellows" listing on the Jesus Project has been inaccessible to awhile now. Is A.J. Levine still planning on joining the Project?
Jobber is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 07:18 PM   #117
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jobber View Post
...
The "Fellows" listing on the Jesus Project has been inaccessible to awhile now. Is A.J. Levine still planning on joining the Project?
The Fellows listing was in error. Read Hoffman's explanation here - the actual fellows are still under consideration.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 01:17 PM   #118
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post
As a kid, two of the television programs that I watched on a regular basis were the Lone Ranger and Superman. As an adult, I look back and realize that my concept of what a hero/good man does in a given situation is heavily influenced by what I watched these television heroes do. I assume that many millions of other kids were also influenced by them.
Me too. Even to this day If an old lady is being mugged by a gang of chavs I instantly slip unnoticed into the nearest telephone kiosk. Unfortunately the smell of piss is like kryptonite to me, and I'm powerless to emerge from the foetal position. The effect is so powerful it happens even when it smells of fresh pine needles and domestos. Luckily nobody has discovered my secret identity as yet, not least the hapless artist on crimewatch.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 10-24-2007, 03:38 PM   #119
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spanky View Post
Just quit already! Please! I mean, are your egos that fucking big that we have to have these endless spats over stupid shit? Honestly. . .:huh:

Thread title:
THE JESUS PROJECT ~ Innaugural Announcement

Subject matter:
childlike spats.
OK - the critics have spoken.

I have split off the digression to Who Wrote Hebrews.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:20 PM   #120
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lpetrich View Post
The historicity of Jesus Christ is the mainstream view, like it or not, and that means that Jesus mythicism is the viewpoint that has the burden of proof.
...appeal to authority? Have you ever considered why HJ is the mainstream view? As far as I can tell, it's the mainstream view not because it's so well supported, but merely because of tradition stretching all the way back to the 2nd century. The case is far from settled.
spamandham is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.