FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-30-2003, 08:54 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Selva Oscura
Posts: 4,120
Default

Again I remind the participants that this thread is about responding to atheist stereotypes, not any one user.
livius drusus is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 09:01 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Default

Quote:
Amen, sister. Not only is it a good tactical maneuver to display a keen understanding of the Golden Rule and its humanistic grounding outside of any one religion, but I find discussions that hinge on this premise far more interesting. Frothing anger may be understandable, but its stubborn immutability and constant use of well-worn responses to equally well-worn claims make for stultifyingly boring conversations.
Thank you! And a hallelujah to you! As usual, excellent point.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 09:21 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: umop apisbn
Posts: 568
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by brighid
After all, rationality, logic, evolution, etc. stand upon strong, factual evidence (even if some refuse to see it.) The truth is what it is.
Damn right. Showing a lack of respect to others does nothing to convince them that our arguments will stand on their own.
andy_d is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 11:07 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,656
Default

Hey, that’s my words he’s quoted in the OP! Apparently, when one tells him the truth (evolution), he regards that as an insult. Tough on him!
Heathen Dawn is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 11:12 AM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 713
Default

My parents (both fundies) heard a debate back in the 1960's between Madalyn Murray O'Hair and a Christian. The only thing they remember about the debate is how angry and rude Ms. O'Hair was to her opponet. A bit more tact, and perhaps some members of the audience might have learned something or perhaps not. I can remember growing up, she was portrayed as the stereotypical angry atheist.
Dargo is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 11:55 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa Bay area
Posts: 3,471
Default

I don't know why anyone would want to "spy" on Magus when he is posting on a Christian forum.

Tacky at best.
Rational BAC is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 11:59 AM   #27
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gilead
Posts: 11,186
Default

The only way to dispel a stereotype is not to be one.
Roland98 is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 12:39 PM   #28
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: U.S.
Posts: 4,171
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Roland98
The only way to dispel a stereotype is not to be one.
OH!

:notworthy :notworthy

genius! pure genius!

DC
Rusting Car Bumper is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 12:56 PM   #29
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Heathen Dawn
Hey, that’s my words he’s quoted in the OP! Apparently, when one tells him the truth (evolution), he regards that as an insult. Tough on him!
Me too. I guess we are the ones that he longs to see roasting in Hell. It's interesting at RR that when they "do unto others" they get so pissed when the others treat them the same way.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 01:15 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,250
Default

Negative characterization of unbelievers is a core part of the rhetoric used in all the Abrahamic religions, and the significance of unbelief is accordingly shaped in that tradition rather than as a response to actual varieties of unbelief. One thing to keep in mind when we see these stereotypes is that it often has little to do with us. They are following the logic of their own beliefs, which describe life without God as inherently evil or at least unwise. Therefore those who do not believe are evil or unwise by definition. This isn't a mistake they make in trying to read our own behavior. It is a logical deduction they make within the paramaters of their own beliefs. Unbelief is the boogie-man they talk about on Sundays, and they usually talk about us when we are not present. Thus when you try and debunk the stereotype you are simply refusing to follow their script (How rude!). Some will adjust there beliefs in response to evidence regarding the actual behavior and beliefs of unbelievers. But others couldn't care less what you say or do; the script is what it is, and any deviation therefrom simply has no role in the drama that is their lives.
Gunnaheave is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:18 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.