Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-15-2008, 02:17 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Opponents of James Holding should enjoy my new thread at the GRD Forum at http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.p...69#post5093169.
|
01-16-2008, 12:55 PM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Holding calls Dr. Avalos "Dr. Stupid?"
|
01-16-2008, 02:12 PM | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
|
|
01-17-2008, 01:19 AM | #15 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bernallio, New Mexico
Posts: 4
|
two wrongs make a right? can't you be bigger than him?
|
01-17-2008, 01:23 AM | #16 | ||
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bernallio, New Mexico
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
Holding is abrasive and certainly crude. But Avalos is a thought police.He seems to me to be opposed to any form of academic freedom? did you not catch all the post modern buzz words and idenity politics allusions? He wants everyone to forget the bible because its' ancient world, oppressive and strange, but he wants us to study other ancient world texts. do you think the Hebrews were only wired and oppressive people in the ancient world? Holding doesn't have a chance against Avalos. But the piece he wrote for the SBL comes as close to book burning as I've seen since being graduate classes with Derridian Feminists. He's just cut out of that cloth. |
||
01-17-2008, 03:10 AM | #17 | |||||
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Quote:
Quote:
Look at him: Richard Carrier - Broken Vector Acharya S - Achy Thomas Paine - A Real Paine in the Posterior Quote:
Quote:
In other words, he advocates taking into account the many discoveries that people in the last few centuries have made about the Bible, and treating it as no more "inspired" than the works of Homer and Hesiod, for instance. Quote:
|
|||||
01-17-2008, 05:46 AM | #18 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
Quote:
More to the point, what are your objections to Dr. Avalos' article? |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|