FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2004, 05:38 PM   #121
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Why can't it be true? God could have created you 5 minutes ago. He told us how He created the world, and what happened. Just because science doesn't agree with it, doesn't mean God couldn't do it. God is not bound by science.
Then why bother creating science when it just contradicts many of the bible's claims?


Is there a need to proceed? I believe in Genesis, you don't. There is no where to proceed to. So we'll just have to agree to disagree. You can think i'm stupid or uneducated all you want, if that makes you feel superior. I trust God, you trust science.


Belief in something impossible does not make someone stupid or uneducated. At some point science has to take a 'leap of faith' as well, the difference is, once that leap has been taken, there is a logical progression of events for science, whereas for creation, there is not.



You're right, omnipotent doesn't mean able to do the impossible. But science can't actually prove for a fact, that God couldn't have created the present world and flood. 200 years ago, traveling to the moon would have been considered mythical or fantasy. You don't know for a fact that new evidence won't reveal itself and show the error of your ways. Scientists have been rejecting the claims in the Bible for hundreds of years, but every new archaeological discovery related to it, just proves its truth.
[/QUOTE]

Perhaps you could enlighten us to these new archaeological discoveries that have proven, or for that matter, even supported, the bible.
mindaika is offline  
Old 01-28-2004, 05:41 PM   #122
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
What if time has no meaning in Heaven? The concept of eternity wouldn't exist. You would just be living life to the epitome of fullfillment without worrying what time or day it is.
The epitome of fulfillment, according to the bible, being spending all that time worshipping God.

Personally, I find sitting in church for 1 hour a week to be incredibly boring. I can't imagine spending all of eternity doing even that...
mindaika is offline  
Old 01-28-2004, 05:44 PM   #123
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 3,558
Default

As a Naval Architect I can safely say that the material properties of wood are such that an Ark of the size as described in the bible is mechanicaly impossible. And this not just by a small factor.
This size limitation was with us until we started building iron and later steel vessels.
OK, maybe god put a "force field" around it to keep it together, but why then coat it inside out with tar. He could have kept the water out as well by just wanting.
All incredible beautiful stories for around a campfire with primitive people. But not defendable by any means in todays world except when using the rather dumb stop word faith.
If enginering would work like that, may I respectfully suggest you don't take a plane or a boat anymore.
Thor Q. Mada is offline  
Old 01-28-2004, 05:46 PM   #124
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Scriptures were inspired by God. Noah wouldn't know about the flood without God telling Him about it. And incidently, please prove that Noah borrowed the flood idea from other cultures, and not the other way around. Sure there are hundreds of flood myths in all cultures, but to me that just proves that the original came from Noah, and through His subsequent generations, it got changed slightly each generation. I think that there are so many flood stories from all over the world is an indicator that there was in a fact a massive flood.
Today, I made a pizza. That proves that all other pizzas are just copies of mine. The fact that many cultures have pizza proves that I am a phenomenal salesman.

Sorry Magus, but you seem to have a slight continuity problem there...
mindaika is offline  
Old 01-28-2004, 05:50 PM   #125
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
The Bible describes Ararat being the highest mountain, but I don't think it was anywhere near as high as it is today.
Another continuity problem! If the bible was inspired by God but recorded by man, then there are two possibilities:

1. God didn't know what the highest mountain was
2. It was a recording error my the people who wrote it down (a pretty big one, and that would most likely mean there are others)
mindaika is offline  
Old 01-28-2004, 08:13 PM   #126
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mindaika
Another continuity problem! If the bible was inspired by God but recorded by man, then there are two possibilities:

1. God didn't know what the highest mountain was
2. It was a recording error my the people who wrote it down (a pretty big one, and that would most likely mean there are others)
why does it only mean those two possibilities?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 01-28-2004, 08:19 PM   #127
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 25
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
why does it only mean those two possibilities?
What other possibilites are there? I guess God could have lied about what the tallest mountain was, or perhaps Ararat WAS the tallest mountain at the time, but was sqaushed down some 12,000 ft by the flood...
mindaika is offline  
Old 01-28-2004, 08:23 PM   #128
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mindaika
What other possibilites are there? I guess God could have lied about what the tallest mountain was, or perhaps Ararat WAS the tallest mountain at the time, but was sqaushed down some 12,000 ft by the flood...
Huh? Oh, let me guess, you are assuming Everest has always been the highest mountain, at ~28,000 feet high?
Magus55 is offline  
Old 01-28-2004, 08:27 PM   #129
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Huh? Oh, let me guess, you are assuming Everest has always been the highest mountain, at ~28,000 feet high?
Do you mean to imply that Everest, as well as about 40 other mountains, have grown over 1000 feet in the last ~4000 years?
mindaika is offline  
Old 01-29-2004, 08:48 AM   #130
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mindaika
Do you mean to imply that Everest, as well as about 40 other mountains, have grown over 1000 feet in the last ~4000 years?
Yup, and don't give me the crap about it being impossible. A volcano in Mexico grew from flat ground to 1000 feet in a couple weeks.
Magus55 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.