Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-07-2007, 12:58 PM | #51 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
One who has faith in God is not necessarily one who has faith in Christ. Quote:
"We all believe the same things about Christ and that entails a complete change in our view of and reaction to the world" = "We are in Christ" and "We are members of Christ" These are clearly references to one's faith in Christ rather than an actual individual. The only question is whether there is any explicit indication that "Lord" and "Christ" are being used synonymously in these metaphorical references to Christian faith. |
||||
02-07-2007, 01:20 PM | #52 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
Quote:
Quote:
Your rendition, for example: Quote:
But, maybe that's just me. ted |
|||
02-07-2007, 01:25 PM | #53 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Quote:
It seems a strange choice either way. |
||
02-07-2007, 01:35 PM | #54 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
|
02-07-2007, 07:26 PM | #55 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
|
02-08-2007, 08:30 AM | #56 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
|
02-08-2007, 03:22 PM | #57 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
|
02-08-2007, 04:47 PM | #58 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
Quote:
ted |
|
02-08-2007, 05:24 PM | #59 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
|
Back to the passage at the center of this:
Quote:
I DID NOT SEE ANYONE ELSE I SWEAR, oh, except that brother of Jesus guy. Why would he mention him only in passing here, as an afterthought? If you take the "only James..." part out, it actually makes more sense. It makes more sense that he would be so assertive. The "I swear" part is about NOT SEEING anyone else, not about seeing the brother of Jesus. In addition, as has been pointed out, several scholars have noted linguistic oddities with the area of the text, Gal 1:13-2:14. |
|
02-08-2007, 05:40 PM | #60 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
Most people want to make Paul confused because he uses "lord" in two distinct ways. I have argued that the few cases where the term kurios, as an absolute form rather than as an epithet, is clearly used for Jesus are in disturbed texts. (To explain, when the term kurios is used with a qualification ["my lord" or lord of something] or as a part of a reference to an entity ["peter potter the lord"], it is not an absolute form of the term.)Check out Mark 12:9, which talks of o kurios tou ampelwnos, "lord of the vineyard", or Matt 24:50 ("the lord of the servant"), or Luke 10:2 ("the lord of the harvest"); these are metaphorical uses which require one to understand the literal use of the descriptive or titular o kurios in each case. The reference "my lord" is just a titular. In the LXX, the non-titular o kurios always referred to YHWH. If you still can't get the distinction I've made -- a distinction which I think is transparent --, then there isn't much else I'll be able to say in order to help you understand. spin |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|