FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-08-2011, 07:55 AM   #121
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post
Do you really think that God could not raise the dead if he wanted to? What is so incredible about that?
Your idol can't raise the dead. He can't even strike down non-believers. An idol can't do anything.

What is so incredible about a religion based on lies?

It happens all the time.

(Except your religion, of course. The only religion in history not based on lies, even if its Old Book looks like it is full of the same frauds that other religions Old Books have)
Do you lie?
aChristian is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 07:57 AM   #122
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Poe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post
Do you really think that God could not raise the dead if he wanted to? What is so incredible about that? Anonymous writers can tell lies, but that's not what we have with the NT. We know honest eyewitnesses or honest associates of honest eyewitnesses wrote it. (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John along with Peter and Paul)
And how exacly do we "know" this?
From reading history.
aChristian is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 07:58 AM   #123
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post
Do you really think that God could not raise the dead if he wanted to? What is so incredible about that?
Your idol can't raise the dead. He can't even strike down non-believers. An idol can't do anything.

What is so incredible about a religion based on lies?

It happens all the time.

(Except your religion, of course. The only religion in history not based on lies, even if its Old Book looks like it is full of the same frauds that other religions Old Books have)
Do you lie?
Sometimes. Your idol never lies, because you worship a being who doesn't exist and so can't lie.

Did the Gospel writers indulge in frauds?

Yes. http://www.bowness.demon.co.uk/mirc1.htm shows them perpetrating the same sorts of frauds that Joseph Smith and Muhammad did.

Game over , I'm afraid.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 08:12 AM   #124
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post

Do you lie?
Sometimes. Your idol never lies, because you worship a being who doesn't exist and so can't lie.

Did the Gospel writers indulge in frauds?

Yes. http://www.bowness.demon.co.uk/mirc1.htm shows them perpetrating the same sorts of frauds that Joseph Smith and Muhammad did.

Game over , I'm afraid.
I looked at the website very briefly. I saw they were claiming that Jesus feeding the 5000 was copying Elijah. That sounds kind of stupid to me. Honest eyewitnesses saw Jesus feed 5000+ once and 4000+ later on. Kind of shoots the Elijah idea to pieces.
aChristian is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 08:13 AM   #125
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post
I looked at the website very briefly. I saw they were claiming that Jesus feeding the 5000 was copying Elijah. That sounds kind of stupid to me. Honest eyewitnesses saw Jesus feed 5000+ once and 4000+ later on. Kind of shoots the Elijah idea to pieces.

All I can do is produce the evidence that your Old Book is full of the same frauds as all other Old Books.

It is up to you to accept the evidence of your own eyes, rather than continue to worship an idol.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 08:16 AM   #126
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post

Do you lie?
Sometimes.
...

Game over , I'm afraid.
It's not a game and lying is a serious sin.
aChristian is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 09:17 AM   #127
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Did the Gospel writers indulge in frauds?

Yes. http://www.bowness.demon.co.uk/mirc1.htm shows them perpetrating the same sorts of frauds that Joseph Smith and Muhammad did.

Game over , I'm afraid.
Steven, you need to think this through. The mere fact that stories in the Quran or Book of Mormon appear to recycle older materials does not mean they are frauds. Fraud presupposes conscious intent to deceive by claiming something that the subject knows is untrue. In law you would have to prove this knowledge. Eg. a tobacco company which claims independently conducted studies show that there is no reliable correlation between smoking and incidence of lung cancer, would be guilty/liable in a fraud case if its internal memoranda show that the directors were aware the 'science' was faked. But in most of religious texts you are not really looking at 'fraud' at all. The beliefs in miracles appear to be deeply enmeshed in altered consciousness and the resulting cognitive 'maladaptation' which apprehend distorted reality as a divine order of things. We know beyond reasonable doubt that Joseph Smith suffered from paranoid delusions. He was not proselytizing to defraud prospects like some Ponzi scheme operator (eg Ted and Tammi Bakker who were overselling membership in their PTL resort). He believed his phantasmagoria absolutely, and his converts were proof to him (as they were to apostle Paul) that his delusions were reality.

Best,
Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 09:24 AM   #128
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post
He was not proselytizing to defraud prospects like some Ponzi scheme operator (eg Ted and Tammi Bakker who were overselling membership in their PTL resort). He believed his phantasmagoria absolutely, and his converts were proof to him (as they were to apostle Paul) that his delusions were reality.
Not a Ponzi scheme?

I had no idea that the Mormon church refuses to take money from converts, not even from the convert's children's pocket money.

You learn something new every day.

http://lds.org/churchmagazines/9-200...2005Friend.pdf has a nice picture of a kind Mormon, absolutely refusing to take money from a small girl.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 09:41 AM   #129
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post
He was not proselytizing to defraud prospects like some Ponzi scheme operator (eg Ted and Tammi Bakker who were overselling membership in their PTL resort). He believed his phantasmagoria absolutely, and his converts were proof to him (as they were to apostle Paul) that his delusions were reality.
Not a Ponzi scheme?

I had no idea that the Mormon church refuses to take money from converts, not even from the convert's children's pocket money.

You learn something new every day.

http://lds.org/churchmagazines/9-200...2005Friend.pdf has a nice picture of a kind Mormon, absolutely refusing to take money from a small girl.
But you see it won't help mixing things up: for example, the commercialization of Lourdes after Pius X. de-facto underwrote the cures as boon to the Catholic faith, tells us nothing about the psychology of the early Jesus cults. We need to examine the earliest communities on their own terms, without reference to later developments which they provoked.

Best,
Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 10:45 AM   #130
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aChristian View Post
Do you really think that God could not raise the dead if he wanted to? What is so incredible about that? Anonymous writers can tell lies, but that's not what we have with the NT. We know honest eyewitnesses or honest associates of honest eyewitnesses wrote it. (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John along with Peter and Paul)
In imagination, there's nothing incredible about it.

But our knowledge of the world makes it highly improbable. Therefore it's not much a stretch to conclude the gospels exaggerate if not lie.
Horatio Parker is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:37 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.