Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-09-2004, 04:49 PM | #21 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,635
|
Quote:
|
|
04-09-2004, 08:35 PM | #22 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rachacha NY
Posts: 4,219
|
Im a taker:
Look at Mithras. Way before Christ. We already know he wasn't born in December, the great Star isn't visible then if you are in the Middle East. Mithras: Virgin birth Twelve followers Killing and resurrection Miracles Birthdate on December 25 Morality Mankind's savior Known as the Light of the world Hmmmm.... Ty |
04-09-2004, 08:41 PM | #23 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,635
|
Quote:
And since Jesus' Decembewr 25 birthdate did not exist for the first few hundreds years of Christianity that one is not particularly persuasive if we are talking about origins. Nor do I think that "Morality" or being a "Savior" is all that specific of a description. |
|
04-09-2004, 08:43 PM | #24 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
If Horus wasn't crucified, between two thieves or not, then there isn't much point discussing the parallel. Personally, I don't think that uniqueness necessarily confers legitimacy. But let's get the evidence first. |
|
04-09-2004, 09:50 PM | #25 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA USA
Posts: 5,039
|
Quote:
For example, it's often stated that christianity quickly spread far and wide. What's overlooked in such a claim is that wherever christianity arrived some other mythology was already there. So then how would such a claim make christianity unique? So a list of what is essentially and uniquely christian seems in order, whether deemed significant or not, and is something I cannot provide. You're the christian. Why christian, and not something else? |
|
04-09-2004, 10:47 PM | #26 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
I'm not making any claims about the uniqueness of Christianity, only that Horus wasn't crucified. Perhaps you should start a new thread? (I probably won't participate). |
|
04-10-2004, 05:45 AM | #27 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Justin Martyr considered the Mysteries to be sufficiently similar to warrant an accusation of demonic well-poisoning. My understanding is that the major difference between the Mysteries and Christianity is the ministry conducted by the living mangod-in-question but we don't find that "fact" actually being used as a counterargument until relatively late (late 2nd?). Instead, we find "demons creating misleading precursors" or "you've got stories and so do we what's the big deal" type arguments. You have to admit it is a bit odd that it takes so long for a Christian to say "our guy was actually wandering around teaching folks and performing miracles just a few years ago, do you know anybody who hung out with Dionysus?". By the time any Christians get around to using this excellent rebuttal, there is nobody still alive who could claim to have walked with the living Jesus. |
|
04-10-2004, 07:20 AM | #28 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
spin |
|
04-10-2004, 03:13 PM | #29 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Old World
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
"And this food is called among us Eukaristia [the Eucharist], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh. For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, "This do ye in remembrance of Me, this is My body;" and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, "This is My blood;" and gave it to them alone. Which the wicked devils have imitated in the mysteries of Mithras, commanding the same thing to be done. For, that bread and a cup of water are placed with certain incantations in the mystic rites of one who is being initiated, you either know or can learn." Justin, The First Apologie [LXVI] "The question will arise, By whom is to be interpreted the sense of the passages which make for heresies? By the devil, of course, to whom pertain those wiles which pervert the truth, and who, by the mystic rites of his idols, vies even with the essential portions of the sacraments of God. He, too, baptizes some—that is, his own believers and faithful followers; he promises the putting away of sins by a layer (of his own); and if my memory still serves me, Mithra there, (in the kingdom of Satan, ) sets his marks on the foreheads of his soldiers; celebrates also the oblation of bread, and introduces an image of a resurrection, and before a sword wreathes a crown.What also must we say to (Satan's) limiting his chief priest to a single marriage? He, too, has his virgins; he, too, has his proficients in continence. Suppose now we revolve in our minds the superstitions of Numa Pompilius, and consider his priestly offices and badges and privileges, his sacrificial services, too, and the instruments and vessels of the sacrifices themselves, and the curious rites of his expiations and vows: is it not clear to us that the devil imitated the well-known moroseness of the Jewish law? Since, therefore he has shown such emulation in his great aim of expressing, in the concerns of his idolatry, those very things of which consists the administration of Christ's sacraments, it follows, of course, that the same being, possessing still the same genius, both set his heart upon, and succeeded in, adapting to his profane and rival creed the very documents of divine things and of the Christian saints his interpretation from their interpretations, his words from their words, his parables from their parables. For this reason, then, no one ought to doubt, either that "spiritual wickednesses," from which also heresies come, have been introduced by the devil, or that there is any real difference between heresies and idolatry, seeing that they appertain both to the same author and the same work that idolatry does. They either pretend that there is another god in opposition to the Creator, or, even if they acknowledge that the Creator is the one only God, they treat of Him as a different being from what He is in truth. The consequence is, that every lie which they speak of God is in a certain sense a sort of idolatry". Tertullian, De praescriptione haereticorum [XL] |
|
04-10-2004, 04:39 PM | #30 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Old World
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|