Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-08-2011, 08:48 PM | #351 | ||
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
|
Quote:
|
||
11-08-2011, 09:08 PM | #352 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
'MIGHT or MIGHT NOT be an accurate report....' It is up to you to SHOW that it CANNOT be an accurate report. J-D his-self has not stated that this verse is an accurate report, or not an accurate report. If you wish to deny it as an accurate report of an actual event, that onus is on YOU. No one else. If you can't, you got no case against J-D's point regarding the possibilities. The POINT being that neither he, nor YOU have any way of determining whether a real living flesh and blood human Jebus ever went into Jerusalem and entered into The Temple, or not. Or whether there was a real living flesh and blood human Jebus, or not. The books are false, they prove nothing one way or the other. Quote:
And the belief that 'something' happened HAS been relevant for near 2000 years, causing incalculable human mayhem and misery. If it were really IRRELEVANT neither of us would be here, and this Forum would not exist. |
|||
11-08-2011, 09:10 PM | #353 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
You cannot be vindicated when you have NO way of knowing if the event really happened. |
|
11-08-2011, 09:19 PM | #354 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
I can tell you without hesitation that Jesus was described as a PHANTOM in gMark 6.48-49 and 9.2-3. I can tell you WITHOUT hesitation that the sea-water walking and the Transfiguration with the resurrected Moses and Elijah did NOT happen as described. I can tell you that gMark is a Myth Fable as PRESENTED. |
||
11-08-2011, 09:25 PM | #355 | ||
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
|
Quote:
|
||
11-08-2011, 09:26 PM | #356 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
|
11-08-2011, 09:29 PM | #357 |
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
|
|
11-08-2011, 09:33 PM | #358 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
Whereas YOU have made mutltiple assertions regarding particular events not being accurate accounts. Thus you were asked if Jebus ever walked in Jerusalem or entered into The Temple. A positive, or a negative answer, would only reflect your personal opinions. You were not there. You don't know. But you do know, and admit that your texts lie. Your logic is based on using lies. But if you are going to use the content of those lying texts to assert that he -did not- walk in Jerusalem or enter The Temple, that onus is entirely upon you. J-D's argument stands and is vidicated, because he has made no such absolute assertions regarding any text or events. |
||
11-08-2011, 09:33 PM | #359 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-08-2011, 09:34 PM | #360 | |||
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
|
Quote:
turned at his glance to shining here; that if(so timid air is firm) under his eyes would stir and squirm |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|