FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2011, 08:48 PM   #351
J-D
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
....Unless you can SHOW that this event COULD NOT have happened, and that it CANNOT be an accurate report of an actual event involving real people,
J-D's point that a situation or event MIGHT BE a literally accurate report of an event that actually took place, stands and is vindicated..
How can J-D be vindicated when the event might NOT have happened?

If NOTHING really happened in the NT the belief something might have happened is IRRELEVANT.
I made a claim that some things might have happened, so if it's true that those things might have happened (even if it's also true that they might not have happened), then my claim is vindicated, even if some other claims are not vindicated.
J-D is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:08 PM   #352
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
....Unless you can SHOW that this event COULD NOT have happened, and that it CANNOT be an accurate report of an actual event involving real people,
J-D's point that a situation or event MIGHT BE a literally accurate report of an event that actually took place, stands and is vindicated..
How can J-D be vindicated when the event might NOT have happened?
You forget, or misrepresent J-D's so oft repeated statement?
'MIGHT or MIGHT NOT be an accurate report....'
It is up to you to SHOW that it CANNOT be an accurate report.
J-D his-self has not stated that this verse is an accurate report, or not an accurate report.
If you wish to deny it as an accurate report of an actual event, that onus is on YOU. No one else.
If you can't, you got no case against J-D's point regarding the possibilities.

The POINT being that neither he, nor YOU have any way of determining whether a real living flesh and blood human Jebus ever went into Jerusalem and entered into The Temple, or not. Or whether there was a real living flesh and blood human Jebus, or not.
The books are false, they prove nothing one way or the other.

Quote:
If NOTHING really happened in the NT the belief something might have happened is IRRELEVANT.
But YOU have no way of knowing what may or may not have really happened.

And the belief that 'something' happened HAS been relevant for near 2000 years, causing incalculable human mayhem and misery.
If it were really IRRELEVANT neither of us would be here, and this Forum would not exist.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:10 PM   #353
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
I made a claim that some things might have happened, so if it's true that those things might have happened (even if it's also true that they might not have happened), then my claim is vindicated, even if some other claims are not vindicated.
The fact that you claim something MIGHT or MIGHT NOT have happened is because you DON'T know if it did.

You cannot be vindicated when you have NO way of knowing if the event really happened.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:19 PM   #354
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
If NOTHING really happened in the NT the belief something might have happened is IRRELEVANT.
But YOU have no way of knowing what may or may not have really happened...
I can ONLY tell you the things I KNOW.

I can tell you without hesitation that Jesus was described as a PHANTOM in gMark 6.48-49 and 9.2-3.

I can tell you WITHOUT hesitation that the sea-water walking and the Transfiguration with the resurrected Moses and Elijah did NOT happen as described.

I can tell you that gMark is a Myth Fable as PRESENTED.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:25 PM   #355
J-D
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
I made a claim that some things might have happened, so if it's true that those things might have happened (even if it's also true that they might not have happened), then my claim is vindicated, even if some other claims are not vindicated.
The fact that you claim something MIGHT or MIGHT NOT have happened is because you DON'T know if it did.

You cannot be vindicated when you have NO way of knowing if the event really happened.
If I claim to have no way of knowing, and if it turns out to be true that I have no way of knowing, then my claim is vindicated.
J-D is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:26 PM   #356
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
...If I claim to have no way of knowing, and if it turns out to be true that I have no way of knowing, then my claim is vindicated.
How will you ever know that?
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:29 PM   #357
J-D
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
I can tell you that gMark is a Myth Fable as PRESENTED.
my father moved through dooms of love
through sames of am through haves of give,
singing each morning out of each night
my father moved through depths of height
J-D is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:33 PM   #358
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
I made a claim that some things might have happened, so if it's true that those things might have happened (even if it's also true that they might not have happened), then my claim is vindicated, even if some other claims are not vindicated.
The fact that you claim something MIGHT or MIGHT NOT have happened is because you DON'T know if it did.

You cannot be vindicated when you have NO way of knowing if the event really happened.
Yes he can. The accuracy of his statement does not depend upon him knowing if any particular event really happened. It is not an assertion.
Whereas YOU have made mutltiple assertions regarding particular events not being accurate accounts.
Thus you were asked if Jebus ever walked in Jerusalem or entered into The Temple. A positive, or a negative answer, would only reflect your personal opinions.
You were not there. You don't know. But you do know, and admit that your texts lie. Your logic is based on using lies.
But if you are going to use the content of those lying texts to assert that he -did not- walk in Jerusalem or enter The Temple, that onus is entirely upon you.

J-D's argument stands and is vidicated, because he has made no such absolute assertions regarding any text or events.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:33 PM   #359
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
I can tell you that gMark is a Myth Fable as PRESENTED.
my father moved through dooms of love
through sames of am through haves of give,
singing each morning out of each night
my father moved through depths of height
Mark 9.2-4
Quote:
2 And after six days Jesus taketh with him Peter, and James, and John, and leadeth them up into an high mountain apart by themselves: and he was transfigured before them.

3 And his raiment became shining, exceeding white as snow; so as no fuller on earth can white them.

4 And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses, and they were talking with Jesus.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:34 PM   #360
J-D
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
I can tell you that gMark is a Myth Fable as PRESENTED.
my father moved through dooms of love
through sames of am through haves of give,
singing each morning out of each night
my father moved through depths of height
Mark 9.2-4
Quote:
2 And after six days Jesus taketh with him Peter, and James, and John, and leadeth them up into an high mountain apart by themselves: [/b] and he was transfigured before them[/b].

3 And his raiment became shining, exceeding white as snow; so as no fuller on earth can white them.

4 And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses, and they were talking with Jesus.
this motionless forgetful where
turned at his glance to shining here;
that if(so timid air is firm)
under his eyes would stir and squirm
J-D is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.