FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-29-2011, 09:00 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Racine, Wi. USA
Posts: 768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Admiral View Post
This is something I have wondered about for a long time. Since so much of the bible narative occurs in Egypt, why is it that the pyramids are not mentioned?
I take it you have rejected "They were irrelevant to the narrative" as a credible answer. Why is that?
Well Doug, I don't really know how to answer that but such a tremendous engineering and construction project lasting over a period of several centuries just doesn't seem too qualify for irrelevance. Even though Genesis and Exodus are complete fiction, that doesn't mean that there was not some commercial traffic and cultural exchange between Egypt and Isreal and other nations to the east.

Dave Nelson
The Admiral is offline  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:14 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Admiral View Post
This is something I have wondered about for a long time. Since so much of the bible narative occurs in Egypt, why is it that the pyramids are not mentioned?

Dave Nelson

A fair question, Dave. By the time the OT was cobbled together, most probably in at least the Hellenistic period if not the Hasmonean ( late 2d century BC) the seat of power in Egypt had shifted to the Nile Delta. The Ptolemies ruled from Alexandria. Pyramid construction had ceased with Ahmose I 1,200 years before. I doubt it was at the forefront of anyone's mind any longer. I suppose they could have mentioned the Lighthouse in Alexandria had they been so inclined.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:17 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

"Cobbled together"?? Were you one of the "cobblers" there? There is no evidence of cobbling together except the hypotheses of some.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Admiral View Post
This is something I have wondered about for a long time. Since so much of the bible narative occurs in Egypt, why is it that the pyramids are not mentioned?

Dave Nelson

A fair question, Dave. By the time the OT was cobbled together, most probably in at least the Hellenistic period if not the Hasmonean ( late 2d century BC) the seat of power in Egypt had shifted to the Nile Delta. The Ptolemies ruled from Alexandria. Pyramid construction had ceased with Ahmose I 1,200 years before. I doubt it was at the forefront of anyone's mind any longer. I suppose they could have mentioned the Lighthouse in Alexandria had they been so inclined.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:18 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

I honestly suggest that you are mistakenly comparing sources 2000 years old providing background to the Torah events with those that came up a mere 150 years ago out of the blue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv
The Midrashic sources have extensive discussions...
:hysterical: Really, Duvduv....
The Mormons also have extensive discussions.....and are about as valid a source.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:23 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Racine, Wi. USA
Posts: 768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
I honestly suggest that you are mistakenly comparing sources 2000 years old providing background to the Torah events with those that came up a mere 150 years ago out of the blue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv
The Midrashic sources have extensive discussions...
:hysterical: Really, Duvduv....
The Mormons also have extensive discussions.....and are about as valid a source.
Duvduv

I may be mistaken, nothing new there, but what are the events to which you refer that came out of the blue a mere 150 years ago?

Dave Nelson
The Admiral is offline  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:27 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

The "commentaries" of the emerging Mormon church, if that is what you were referring to, "The Pearl of Great Price" etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Admiral View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
I honestly suggest that you are mistakenly comparing sources 2000 years old providing background to the Torah events with those that came up a mere 150 years ago out of the blue.
Duvduv

I may be mistaken, nothing new there, but what are the events to which you refer that came out of the blue a mere 150 years ago?

Dave Nelson
Duvduv is offline  
Old 12-29-2011, 09:32 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Racine, Wi. USA
Posts: 768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
The "commentaries" of the emerging Mormon church, if that is what you were referring to, "The Pearl of Great Price" etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Admiral View Post

Duvduv

I may be mistaken, nothing new there, but what are the events to which you refer that came out of the blue a mere 150 years ago?

Dave Nelson
No, that's not what I was referencing. Are you saying that you think I'm wrong in assuming that there was commercial traffic and cultural exchange between Egypt and nations to the East of Egypt?

Dave Nelson
The Admiral is offline  
Old 12-29-2011, 10:40 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

According to secular/humanist apologetics, Judaism was merely the recipient of ideas, theology etc. and had absolutely nothing of its own to contribute to surrounding cultures. It originating absolutely nothing. It's laughable. But yes, the midrashim flesh out a great deal of information.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Admiral View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
The "commentaries" of the emerging Mormon church, if that is what you were referring to, "The Pearl of Great Price" etc.
No, that's not what I was referencing. Are you saying that you think I'm wrong in assuming that there was commercial traffic and cultural exchange between Egypt and nations to the East of Egypt?

Dave Nelson
Duvduv is offline  
Old 12-29-2011, 12:17 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Admiral View Post
This is something I have wondered about for a long time. Since so much of the bible narative occurs in Egypt, why is it that the pyramids are not mentioned?
This is a feeble argument. The pyramids are not the most pervasive thing in Egypt by a long way.

A much stronger argument would be: "Since so much of the bible narative occurs in Egypt, why is it that the post-card sellers are not mentioned?"

"Baksheesh!!!"

Actually that's another thing...

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 12-29-2011, 04:34 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
I honestly suggest that you are mistakenly comparing sources 2000 years old providing background to the Torah events with those that came up a mere 150 years ago out of the blue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv
The Midrashic sources have extensive discussions...
:hysterical: Really, Duvduv....
The Mormons also have extensive discussions.....and are about as valid a source.
The 2nd century AD Seder Olam Rabbah and Rabbinical sources place the Exodus at 2448 AM (or 1313 BC).
These Midrashic discussions and the resulting commentaries date to a time some 1200 years after the alleged events, and are the product of a people whom had been conquered and exiled repeatedly.
These Rabbinical discussions and 'explanations' are filled with imaginative folk-religion material and creative 'Midrashed' situations that are nowhere to be found within the actual TaNaKa texts.

Just because a 'source' is 2000 years old, it is no indication that source is any accurate accounting of events from 3000+ years ago, or 1200 years in their past.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.