FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

View Poll Results: What do you think the probability of a historical Jesus is?
100% - I have complete faith that Jesus of Nazareth was a real person. 8 6.15%
80-100% 10 7.69%
60-80% 15 11.54%
40-60% 22 16.92%
20-40% 17 13.08%
0-20% 37 28.46%
o% - I have complete faith that Jesus of Nazareth was not a real person, 21 16.15%
Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-10-2008, 03:18 AM   #291
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Dear aa5874,

The christians did not arrive from outer space. Darwin tells us they mutated (spiritually?) from the "pagans".
... whereas you believe that Christians were Intelligently Designed.


Dear GakuseiDon,

In a very literary fashion, lavishly and Frankenstein like.

Best wishes,


Pete
mountainman is offline  
Old 12-10-2008, 10:30 AM   #292
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
I think Eusebius with the help of Tertullian, will eventually tell me who is on the other side of the coin.
Dear aa5874,

The christians did not arrive from outer space. Darwin tells us they mutated (spiritually?) from the "pagans". The pagan tree grew "christian branches". Therefore I think the "other side" of the original christian coin --- where it split from its pagan roots - is pagan (ie: Hellenistic)

Recall that the two terms -- "christian" and "pagan" -- came into existence at roughly the same time much like the creation of an elementary particle and its anti-particle. The term "pagani' appears in christian inscriptions in the mid fourth century (RL Fox), the century at the beginning of which Constantine embraced the religion of the galilaeans, and the rest is history.


Best wishes,


Pete

PS: Who is Lithargoel?
I just cannot release (cannot ignore) Eusebius and Tertullian, they appear to know a lot about Paul and Jesus and the Church. They must remain in custody (are to be researched and questioned extensively) until they talk.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-10-2008, 12:52 PM   #293
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post

I just cannot release (cannot ignore) Eusebius and Tertullian, they appear to know a lot about Paul and Jesus and the Church. They must remain in custody (are to be researched and questioned extensively) until they talk.
You could have another 100,000 pages of their propaganda tripe, and it would still prove absolutely nothing about what actually transpired.
What do you want to hear? their continuators stand ever ready to continue the making up of otherwise unknown christian "history" to order.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 12-10-2008, 04:12 PM   #294
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
You have already admitted ana selthat your percentage of 20% is useless. and I have agreed with you. Please read your own post. Why did you use such a precentage knowing, in advance, that it was useless, and baseless to some degree?
Useless and baseless are not the same thing.

By the way, your 0% assertion is just as useless as my 20% assertion, and is also baseless. It is not impossible for there to be a historical core to Jesus. It is not even impossible for Jesus as depicted in the NT to have existed.
spamandham is offline  
Old 12-10-2008, 04:18 PM   #295
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
How exactly would you define this term "historical core"?
...from a couple of posts ago

Quote:
Originally Posted by me
I define an 'historical core' as a person from whom the legends originated, or who was at least a critical element in them at a later date, such that the legends as we know them could not reasonably have existed without that person. This is the 'historical Jesus' I refer to, and I think most skeptics here have something like that in mind as well when they talk about a historical core.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Secondly in what manner can it be plural? Say we have two separate people X and Y.
A composite character, such as Paul is argued to be by certain radical scholars, has multiple historical cores. I don't see a problem with that. The concept of a historical core is that there may be real history underlying a legend, and it's a game of Clue to try to figure out what the simplest explanation is.

If it turns out that real history involves multiple critical people, that's ok.
spamandham is offline  
Old 12-10-2008, 08:01 PM   #296
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post

I just cannot release (cannot ignore) Eusebius and Tertullian, they appear to know a lot about Paul and Jesus and the Church. They must remain in custody (are to be researched and questioned extensively) until they talk.
You could have another 100,000 pages of their propaganda tripe, and it would still prove absolutely nothing about what actually transpired.
What do you want to hear? their continuators stand ever ready to continue the making up of otherwise unknown christian "history" to order.
Now, come on.

If you were an investigator and you had in your custody, or held for questioninng, some-one who you think committed a crime, would you release that person of interest because they lied about events with respect to the crime or their location?

No way.

You would keep on questionning that person of interest. You would want to know the reason why that person was making false statements about the crime or their whereabouts.

Hopefully if you listen carefully and ask the right questions, you just might realise that you actually have a confession.

To ignore Eusebius and Tertullian may mean ignoring the manufacturers of the NT.

Please listen carefully to Eusebius and Tertullian, we may have a confession on our hands.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-10-2008, 08:19 PM   #297
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
It is not even impossible for Jesus as depicted in the NT to have existed.
Another useless statement.

You cannot prove that it is possible that Jesus of the NT can ascend through clouds and that it was witnessed by his disciples.

You cannot prove it is possible that Peter, James and John witnessed the transfiguration of Jesus and witnesses dead prophets come back to life after being dead for hundreds of years.

You cannot prove it is possible that Jesus was born of a virgin and conceived through the Holy Ghost as witnessed by his mother Mary.

You cannot prove it is possible that Jesus walked on the sea during a sea-storm as witnessed by Peter who also attempted to walk on water.

And you cannot prove that it is possible that Jesus was dead for three days as stated by the authors of the NT and that he rose from the dead, with his wounds all healed and having only scars as witnessed by the disciples.

You cannot prove Jesus of the NT was possible. You can only say Jesus was possible.

Jesus of the NT was impossible.

All things impossible have NO evidence of their possibility.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 12-10-2008, 09:00 PM   #298
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
It is not even impossible for Jesus as depicted in the NT to have existed.
Another useless statement.

You cannot prove that it is possible that Jesus of the NT can ascend through clouds and that it was witnessed by his disciples.
Certainly I can prove it's possible. Most everyone here other than you, will comprehend this proof:

Imagine for a moment, Jesus floating up into the clouds. Further, imagine his disciples witnessing it. What internal contradictions did that excercise involve? If none, then it is logically possible. It just isn't likely, because we do not observe things like that happening. You can estimate the probability as close to zero as you like, but you can not consistently claim it is identically 0 (impossible), because the scenario involves no internal contradictions.
spamandham is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 12:01 AM   #299
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

You could have another 100,000 pages of their propaganda tripe, and it would still prove absolutely nothing about what actually transpired.
What do you want to hear? their continuators stand ever ready to continue the making up of otherwise unknown christian "history" to order.
Now, come on.

If you were an investigator and you had in your custody, or held for questioninng, some-one who you think committed a crime, would you release that person of interest because they lied about events with respect to the crime or their location?

No way.

You would keep on questionning that person of interest. You would want to know the reason why that person was making false statements about the crime or their whereabouts.

Hopefully if you listen carefully and ask the right questions, you just might realise that you actually have a confession.

To ignore Eusebius and Tertullian may mean ignoring the manufacturers of the NT.

Please listen carefully to Eusebius and Tertullian, we may have a confession on our hands.
As far as I'm concerned they have perjured themselves repeatedly, they have already been questioned at long length, they are no longer "persons of interest" and are no longer being detained for questioning, but rather are now safely locked away for the welfare and safety of all society, just awaiting trial, judgment, and sentencing.

Personally, I am convinced that the jury will find them guilty on all counts, and The Judge will throw The Book at them, and they will be put away for a long, looooong time.
just metamorphically speaking, you understand?
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 12-11-2008, 12:11 AM   #300
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

And given the twisted reasoning employed by their cohorts, when these have been rounded up and brought before The Bar of Justice,
Eusebius, Tertullian and Constantine will have lots of company in that place.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.