Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-14-2005, 09:39 AM | #91 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
|
|
03-14-2005, 09:42 AM | #92 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
|
Quote:
|
|
03-14-2005, 09:57 AM | #93 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
03-14-2005, 09:59 AM | #94 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
03-14-2005, 11:48 AM | #95 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Poor Little Eve
Quote:
|
|
03-14-2005, 12:05 PM | #96 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Maybe I shouldn't have fueled you. No, no, and well...erm...no. First, the first website is a Catholic conspiracy website, everything it says is instantly discredited because of its a priori position. The second website doesn't work. Where do you get the "universe ending" thing? I can't find it. As for representation of YHWH into Latin it being IEVE is entirely fallacious. The Hebrews didn't have vowels, so you're little theory about inventing a code word is entirely...what's the word...insane? Secondly, "Eve" is an English rendering, Latin would not have pronounced IEVE as anything except yehweh, which automatically nils any sort of argument that you have there.
And it's not the prime word for woman, since woman was already used in Genesis before Eve was given the name :rolling:. And the reason Moses wasn't circumcised was because it wasn't mandatory in Egypt. Remember, all the others had to get circumcised also. |
03-14-2005, 01:19 PM | #97 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Clivedurdle -
Your first link is to a thoroughly unpleasant source, although you might not be aware of who Oliver P. Revilo is. I added the link to your second and made it a quote, for clarity/copyright issues. But that post seems to have been cribbed from here or possibly here - Channeled Info from the Ascended Masters. (One of these probably represents the dead link.) I would request that posts in this forum rely on scholarship, literary analysis, history, archeology, linguistics, etc., and avoid pseudo-linguistics or channeled information from imaginary beings. OK? There's another place for that. Toto |
03-14-2005, 02:35 PM | #98 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
|
Don't forget that Eve's Hebrew name is XWH, not HWH. The het is part of the root, it can't just be done away with. And though the biblical explanation relates it to XY - living, the name may also be related to hiwya (with a het), which means snake both in Aramaic and Arabic.
Anyway, the best candidate for a mother-earth type chief fertility goddess in levant religions is Asherah and her equivalents, and we have inscriptional as well as biblical evidence for at least traces of an Asherah cult in Israel in monarchic times, so I'm not sure there is need to introduce yet another suppressed chief goddess figure. If I understand correctly, the name YHWH could have been imported from some southern nomadic tribes, and basically used to substitute for Baal in myths imported from an earlier Canaanite culture? Did those tribes have other known deities? Any female ones? |
03-14-2005, 03:14 PM | #99 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
The word "HWH" or "Ch-W-H" (Kh-w-H) is a single word in the Hebrew language (see Strong's 2331) and there are no known instances of the particles "W-H" being used separately to express a word or idea. An interesting exercise is to look up those three letter Hebrew words that use "WH" as their second and third letters. Such as; "A-W-H", Strong's #183-5 "G-W-H",...............1465-7 "H-W-H",...............1933 "T-W-H",...............2901 "K-W-H",...............3554 "L-W-H",...............3867 "O-W-H",...............5753-5 These are a few examples, each are complete words from which the "WH" elements may not be broken out or inferred to mean anything apart from what the complete word means, which indicates that there is not much of a valid case for doing so with the word for "Eve". So this example does not meet even the first (#1.) of the 4 criteria which I listed. |
|
03-14-2005, 05:19 PM | #100 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
I had to know what the cheezy grin was for.
+WH means "spin" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|