FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2008, 12:45 AM   #241
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post

And yet "Christian history" as presented by the "Christian Fathers", revels in stories of these believers alleged martyrdom's, boasting of how boldly and faithfully they withstood any punishment or torture inflicted rather than submit even an inch, or renounce their faith.
They do? All of them?

Could you back up your claim with some actual citations please that show how wide spread among the writings of the pre-nicene fathers that have come down to us this "reveling" actually is? Where precisely does it appear?

Jeffrey
Sorry, but I had to be away for a while, and first wish to thank those of you who have responded to Jeffrey in my behalf.
The problem here is that Jeffrey clearly misunderstood my statement;

"And yet "Christian history" as presented by the "Christian Fathers", revels in stories of these believers alleged martyrdom's"

By his introducing of his unwarranted idea that my statement was confined to "the writings of the pre-nicene fathers" whereas I had neither wrote, nor even implied any such thing.

The term "Christian Fathers" is quite inclusive, as it is, I did not even so much as designate "EARLY Christian Fathers", because I was referring to the so called history of The Christian Church, and of its martyrs, as it has been presented to the world by writings of The Christian Fathers during the first 8 centuries of the Christian Church.
(But by no means limited to the first 8 centuries, as we still have a line of "Christian Fathers" going on, and carrying forward these "traditions".)

Yet even The Christian Church itself admits that these stories are fables and fictitious fabrications, which certainly ought to cause any man to ponder the true character of all those previous pious frauds who were so lacking in integrity, and even reverence for the truth of their own religion, that they thought it good service to their gawd to pile up ever more lies on top of lies.
I am not going to provide the citations for all these hundreds of lying fictions that were penned by "Christian" hands, they were written, and they will ever remain as permanent witnesses against the integrity of the Christian Fathers, and of the Christian religion.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 02:55 AM   #242
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 89
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkA View Post
There are thousands of pottery fragments with inscriptions, drawings, decorations on them dating back to the Neolithic. Yet not one shard with a christian symbol on it survives before the fourth century?
You are comparing the evidence left behind by entire civilizations with that left behind by a small, illegal religious sect? Sorry, I don't find that generalization reasonable.



In order to "expect" to find this evidence you must first assume that there were many people willing to risk placing a permanent symbol of their illegal association on their household items and then you must assume that you would recognize any such symbol for what it was. I don't consider either of those assumptions reasonable.

Quote:
So I would expect such symbols to survive two thousand years and I would expect at least one would have been discovered.
IMO, your expectations are simply unrealistic. This is just a weak argument from silence.
Entire civilizations? Small groups of prehistoric hunter gathers and proto farmers have left this sort of evidence that has survived thousands of years.

Again why do you think persecuted sects and groups all through history have left such evidence behind except for the christians? Why no evidence on gravestones for instance when they were already dead and beyond persecution? Were the christians unique among Roman societies in that they did not provide for burials?

Why do you say we would not recognize them? Were there different symbols in use before the fourth century and what evidence have you for that?
MarkA is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 09:30 AM   #243
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
You are comparing the evidence left behind by entire civilizations with that left behind by a small, illegal religious sect?
Why do you keep implying that Christianity was a small, illegal sect prior to Constantine?
I already did (ie Pliny and Tacitus). Pliny, alone, establishes both since the whole point of the letter is what to do about alleged violators of the prohibition and he clearly knows very little about them. This wasn't a large, well-known organization if Pliny's letter is any indication. It was vaguely known and understood even by those whose job it was to prosecute them.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 09:45 AM   #244
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkA View Post
Small groups of prehistoric hunter gathers and proto farmers have left this sort of evidence that has
survived thousands of years.
Do you imagine the evidence to be representative of every small group of hunters or proto-farmers? Our discoveries and just a small portion of the total number of folks alive around at the time. It is only because there were enough people leaving enough evidence that some of it has managed to survive. It is a simple fact that we have lost far more than we have found. It is simply not reasonable to expect that every small group of hunters or proto-farmers to leave such evidence nor is it reasonable to draw any conclusion from the absence of such evidence.

Quote:
Again why do you think persecuted sects and groups all through history have left such evidence behind except for the christians?
I must have missed the post where you offered examples. What illegal or persecuted minority religious groups have left behind "hard archaeological evidence" of their existence during the time they were persecuted?

Quote:
Why no evidence on gravestones for instance when they were already dead and beyond persecution?
Their families would not be.

Quote:
Why do you say we would not recognize them?
I'm not saying you would not, I'm saying it is naive to assume that you would. If we didn't have texts informing us that early Christians used a fish symbol to identify themselves to each other, how would you know the symbol was significant? Even with that information, we still don't know exactly why or how that symbol was derived.

Quote:
Were there different symbols in use before the fourth century and what evidence have you for that?
I don't recall who tells us about the use of the fish symbol but I see no reason to assume that this was the only non-obvious symbol used by Christians.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 09:47 AM   #245
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post

Why do you keep implying that Christianity was a small, illegal sect prior to Constantine?
I already did (ie Pliny and Tacitus). Pliny, alone, establishes both since the whole point of the letter is what to do about alleged violators of the prohibition and he clearly knows very little about them.
Pliny also establishes another of the points that you have made on this thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
There were, apparently, some Christians willing to suffer martyrdom for their beliefs but, simply from the fact that the movement not only survived but grew, we know that many more were not so willing but more interested in continuing the movement.
Consider:
...after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food, but food of an ordinary and innocent kind. Even this practice, however, they had abandoned after the publication of my edict, by which, according to your orders, I had forbidden political associations.
The Christians that Pliny is prosecuting were given to him by name, not by some kind of raid on one of their meetings, since they had apparently given them up because of the edict. Hardly a wholehearted welcoming of persecution with open arms. Elsewhere in the letter Pliny writes of former Christians. Pliny even anticipates being able to bring the Christian sectarians back into the mainstream:
From hence it is easy to imagine what multitudes may be reclaimed from this error, if a door be left open to repentance.
Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 10:41 AM   #246
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
I am here attempting to defend a prosecution of a case of imperial forgery
A prosecution has to begin with a showing of probable cause. I have seen no evidence that shows probable cause.

To the contrary, you have argued that your indictment is a "postulate" and that, as such, it requires no evidence.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 12:15 PM   #247
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Open profession of ones faith, say on a tombstone, would have been risky.
Everywhere, or only in the regions being persecuted? Justin Martyr and Tertullian both wrote openly to the leaders of Rome. If Christianity was universally illegal and Christians universally persecuted, could they have gotten away with such an open profession of their beliefs?
Justin Martyr didn't get away with it , he was eventually executed for his faith.

Persecution was erratic but it probably happened occasionally in most places. (It would partly depend on the priorities of the Governor who would change every few years.). How far the (low) risk of being killed for being an open Christian deterred you would depend on the person. Most, one would expect, played safe.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 12:50 PM   #248
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I just noticed this story: Road workers find 1,000 ancient graves in Thessaloniki
Quote:
Workers digging a subway system in the Greek city of Thessaloniki have unearthed a treasure trove of graves containing jewellery, art and coinage,the Greek archaeological service has said.

Some 1,000 graves were uncovered with the greater share, 886, found east of the centre of the metropolis, at the site of a cemetery during Roman and Byzantine times.
The graves are dated from the first century BC to the 5th century CE.

I wonder how long it will take for archeologists to analyze the finds.
Toto is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 02:12 PM   #249
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post

They do? All of them?

Could you back up your claim with some actual citations please that show how wide spread among the writings of the pre-nicene fathers that have come down to us this "reveling" actually is? Where precisely does it appear?

Jeffrey
I am not going to provide the citations for all these hundreds of lying fictions that were penned by "Christian" hands,
But I didn't ask for hundreds.

Quote:
they were written, and they will ever remain as permanent witnesses against the integrity of the Christian Fathers, and of the Christian religion.
In other words, you don't know where they are. Thanks for confirming what I suspected to be the case.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 06:25 PM   #250
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post

Why do you keep implying that Christianity was a small, illegal sect prior to Constantine?
I already did (ie Pliny and Tacitus).
What other evidence do you have, since these two references are likely enough to be obvious forgeries identified a century ago. See Witnesses to the Historicity of Jesus by Arthur Drews (1912).

Best wishes,



Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.