![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
|
![]()
Hey John A. Broussard,
I like Toto’s post above, and will toss this in for good measure: Straight Dope: What's the deal with angels? |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
|
![]() Quote:
These ‘elohim’ are the very same gods who created everything back in Genesis 1:1. What Christian or Jew is going to sit around and allow us to point out that their god created little subordinate sub-gods? ![]() What Christian or Jew is going to sit around and allow us to point out that their religion is a derivative of Canaanite and Ugaritic El-worship? They are going to behave like Believers. Right? ![]() They are going to thicken the shit barrel and invent angels. Right? ![]() In other words, it was necessary for Beleivers to invent angels so that they could save face when presented with the facts, and to conceal their religion’s polytheistic roots. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
![]() Quote:
Modern religious beliefs are a wonderful mish mash of bits of ideas from so many different places! If I had lived in 1200 when the main theory of everything was goddidit, backed up by an inquisition, I would construct an equivalent to particle physics based on the entities I had been told existed. I love the contradictory descriptions of cherubim in theinerrant bible! what have apologists said about this, is it an example of evolution? Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northeastern OH but you can't get here from there
Posts: 415
|
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
|
![]()
Check out Psalm 18. Evidently one of Yahweh’s favorite pastimes was to blow smoke out his nose and ride around on the back of a cherub.
It looks to me like cherubs (cherubim) were a Yahweh thing, and not an El thing. When Yahweh got combined with El the “cherubim�? and the “sons of the Most High�? got thrown into a blender and “angels�? came out. I wonder if Chemosh enjoyed wearing those fake wings on his back? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 631
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks. Your comment showed the value of this forum. It forced me to check out the date. It is third century. Probably late. And it's a fairly complete document which includes more than Hebrews. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
![]() Quote:
I strongly recommend it to anyone who has even a passing interest in the concept of angels. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|