![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			 Moderator - History of Non Abrahamic Religions, General Religious Discussions 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2011 
				Location: Latin America 
				
				
					Posts: 6,620
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I find it incredibly ironic that someone espousing "Jesus Christ's true message" can be so skeptical about Gautama Buddha. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Or am I the only one?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2006 
				Location: Edmonton 
				
				
					Posts: 5,679
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			And I find the converse quite ironic: the iron-willed Jesus mythers turn all dewy-eyed and credulous when it comes to Buddha. It makes one suspect there's some kind of hidden agenda here that precludes the accurate reading of the literature.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#13 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: nowhere 
				
				
					Posts: 15,747
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I have to invent a word called overgeneralizationism, describing a disease seen lurking around this forum.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#14 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2009 
				Location: Austin, TX 
				
				
					Posts: 1,491
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I believe both the Buddha and Jesus were historical figures.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#15 | 
| 
			
			 Talk Freethought Staff 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2002 
				Location: Toronto, eh 
				
				
					Posts: 42,293
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Of course Buddha was real.  I've seen statues of him.  You can't make statues of people who weren't real.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#16 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: Perth 
				
				
					Posts: 1,779
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#17 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: Perth 
				
				
					Posts: 1,779
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Gday all, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Here is quick list for comparison, based purely on my opinions : Adam, Noah : certainly myth Abraham : almost certainly a myth Jesus : probably a myth Hercules, Aesculapius, Dionysus, Apollo et al : all myths Lao Tzu : almost certainly a myth Krishna : almost certainly a myth Buddha : probably a myth Mohamed : almost certainly historical Kapyong  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#18 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2010 
				Location: seattle, wa 
				
				
					Posts: 9,337
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It should be noted that there are reputable scholars who argue that there is no evidence for the historical existence of Mohammed.  I don't necessarily agree with them.  However, just for the record ...
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#19 | ||||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2008 
				Location: Location: eastern North America 
				
				
					Posts: 1,468
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Lao Zi, whose name you have misspelled, was not a myth, he was a government official, living roughly at the same time as Siddhartha, and a contemporary of KongZi, known in the west as Confucius. There are some ancient sources in ZG (ZhongGuo, aka China) which claim that KongZi and LaoZi met and discussed various subjects.... (a stele is a stone slab) Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 avi  | 
||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#20 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2006 
				Location: Falls Creek, Oz. 
				
				
					Posts: 11,192
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	The vacuum of evidence for pre-4th century Christianity  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |