FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-26-2007, 07:21 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burning flames View Post
what are the falsities?
I can't tell you most of them without watching the video again, which would sicken me to do. However, just from memory, Christians do not believe that Jesus was born on December 25. And then of course the TF has not been proven a forgery. It makes a slew of claims regarding other religions which I have never been able to verify, and which I suspect are similarly erroneous.

Even if there weren't so many glaring, immediately-recognized factual inaccuracies therein, I still wouldn't used an unsourced, dubious youtube-type video to educate myself. There are plenty of accurate resources for debunking Christianity on the web.

Perhaps someone else is bored enough to watch the thing again and list the errors more completely. I am not that person, however.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:24 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 887
Default

hatsoff, what are some good ACCURATE sources?

peace
burning flames is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:05 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burning flames View Post
hatsoff, what are some good ACCURATE sources?
On that particular topic, the similarity of Christianity to pre-existing mysticism, I really don't know of any specific sources. Generally, though, you'll want to look for something from a reputable author or authors, and with appropriate citations.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 03:19 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 887
Default

well if anyone knmows good accurate sources on the web or otherwise, feel free to post them up. the people on archarya s's forums think she is a goddess, by the way. I wish she was as right as they say. who knows...
burning flames is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:11 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

It's all just a coincidence. Of course there is absolutely no connection between any solar religions and Christianity.

Even Justin thought this was the case...
dog-on is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:42 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Munich Germany
Posts: 434
Default

I hate it when they say "God's sun", when the words "sun" and "son" are only similar in English. They never actually make this connection, but the way in which they say it is clearly meant to give this impression. This is a big turn off, so I haven't bothered watching the rest yet.
squiz is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:45 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squiz View Post
I hate it when they say "God's sun", when the words "sun" and "son" are only similar in English. They never actually make this connection, but the way in which they say it is clearly meant to give this impression. This is a big turn off, so I haven't bothered watching the rest yet.
God's son is the light of the world. Better?
dog-on is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 04:56 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squiz View Post
I hate it when they say "God's sun", when the words "sun" and "son" are only similar in English. They never actually make this connection, but the way in which they say it is clearly meant to give this impression. This is a big turn off, so I haven't bothered watching the rest yet.
That would annoy me too. It suggests dishonesty; awareness that it isn't true but a willingness to insinuate it and place no barrier to the impression that the unwary will get from it. I've certainly seen the link made explicitly by some of their hapless victims online.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:53 AM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by squiz View Post
I hate it when they say "God's sun", when the words "sun" and "son" are only similar in English. They never actually make this connection, but the way in which they say it is clearly meant to give this impression. This is a big turn off, so I haven't bothered watching the rest yet.
That would annoy me too. It suggests dishonesty; awareness that it isn't true but a willingness to insinuate it and place no barrier to the impression that the unwary will get from it. I've certainly seen the link made explicitly by some of their hapless victims online.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
If that's a "hapless victim" what does that make someone who's been totally fleeced into believing Jesus' resurrection?

Certainly we should feel some annoyance towards this poor fellows predicament as well?
Yellum Notnef is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 05:13 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 887
Default

so the astrotheology is BS for the most part?
burning flames is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.