FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-11-2004, 08:31 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Roanoke, VA.
Posts: 2,198
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Nah, it doesn't contradict the age of accountability. The Age of accountability just refers to the responsibility placed on those who can't understand right from wrong. Has nothing to do with whether they are born sinful.
I have always understood the "age of accountability" to refer to the point in a human life when that person becomes accountable for original sin, basically because they are old and mature enough to understand sin. But doesn't the Bible clearly teach that God finds guilt in people that do not understand right from wrong? This seems like a perfectly plausible position since Adam and Eve had no concept of right or wrong and still got blamed. Heck, I got blamed for their sin, and I wasn't even born for another 6,000 years. If the age of accountability is founded on Biblical passages, then please note them. The passage I quoted suggests that even little kids are evil. Where are the verses that contradict it?

The doctrine of original sin indicates that we are all damned by man's fall. If the age of accountability is valid and God can bring a child into his presence in heaven - even though that child was born tainted and never accepted the gift of salvation - then why can't God do the exact same thing for me as an adult? I'm not an atheist because I don't like God; I'm an atheist because I think the concept is illogical. There is no rebellion on my part, so why won't God cut me the same slack he can cut a child?

On a side note, many of the atheists I know site God's depravity in the Bible as the reason they don't believe the Bible to be true. Wouldn't this indicate that those people also cannot tell right from wrong and are thus unaccountable per your comment?
Postcard73 is offline  
Old 02-12-2004, 03:49 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 7,558
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ebonmuse
Jehoiachin was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem: and he did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord.
Interesting. The age of accountability in Mormonism is 8 (there is no original sin in Mormonism, but that is the age when people become responsible for their own sins and eligible for baptism). I've sometimes wondered what that was based on; possibly this is it.
trendkill is offline  
Old 02-12-2004, 04:30 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by winstonjen
That also raises problems because the bible doesn't define 'youth', just as the bible is ambiguous in many other places as well.
Based on the age which the bible claims for Noah (and his sons), "youth" probable means "not yet 100 years of age"
Sven is offline  
Old 02-12-2004, 06:17 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Default

I've seen one fundy use the "forced waiting to enter the promised land" story in Exodus as the formula on which they base their age of accountability fiction. Admittedly it makes absolutely no sense, but that's never stopped 'em.
gregor is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:44 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.