FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-20-2005, 04:05 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth
Oh, and other things which are more based on "Catholic tradition" and extrabiblical theology than on actual scriptural backing include the concept of the Trinity that most modern Christians hold.
Actually, I find the Trinity to be extremely supported by scripture. Just because you don't doesn't mean it isn't in there.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 04-20-2005, 04:07 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Which means they can make up absolutely any doctrine they want, even if it conflicts with scripture. They say Mary was born sinless. Not only is that not mentioned in the Bible, it is directly contradicted by the Bible.
Umm, according to the Catholics, it's not.

Quote:
So does not holding to Sola Scriptura mean they can contradict scripture too?
I think any Catholic scholar or theologian would pooh-pooh your notion that the RCC can "contradict" scripture.

Quote:
You don't need to be protestant to see the corruption and problems with the Catholic Church and its "tradition".
And you don't need to be Catholic to see the problems with the doctrine of Sola Scriptura or the corruption in many Protestant churches and denominations.

Take it up with the Catholics, why don't you?
Mageth is offline  
Old 04-20-2005, 04:14 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Actually, I find the Trinity to be extremely supported by scripture. Just because you don't doesn't mean it isn't in there.
Yes, if one starts with the concept of the Trinity that the Church developed over centuries, as you do, and then "look back" at the Bible, it would seem apparent that that concept of the Trinity is "extremely supported" by Scripture. But that's not how it originally was.

I've seen all the support for the "Trinity" found in the scripture. Yes, one can deduce the concept of the Trinity from what's found there (and also can deduce other concepts of the Godhead, as many did, and have), but it took the "Church" a few hundred years to finally come up with the actual Trinitarian doctrine that you're familiar with today. The "Trinity" you believe in today is a product of the early Church, and won out over competing concepts of the Godhead, and is thus as much a "tradition" of the Church as it is Bible-based. And again, working back from the concept, it might seem "obvious" to you when you look at scripture. But it certainly wasn't always so.
Mageth is offline  
Old 04-20-2005, 06:17 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
The assumption of Mary has no scriptural backing. Its based on Catholic tradition.
. . . and Catholic tradition is based on reality. The Assumption of Mary is to be compared with the Ascension of Jesus but to whom the woman was added. The Assumption of Mary makes heaven complete for without her the city of God would not be part of heaven: "The woman you saw is the great city which has sovereignty over the kings of the earth." That is to say, Mary is the city of God in each person to the same extent they have aboriginal heritage in God = basis for the veneration of Mary which includes whispering adorations).
Chili is offline  
Old 04-20-2005, 06:26 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Actually, I find the Trinity to be extremely supported by scripture. Just because you don't doesn't mean it isn't in there.
That's too bad because the Assumption of Mary ends the trinity with the Coronation of Mary. Here's a passage for you Magus.

"Enraged at her escape the dragon went off to make war on the rest of her offspring, on those who keep Gods commandments and give witness to Jesus. He took up his position by the shore of the sea" (Rev.12:17).
Chili is offline  
Old 04-21-2005, 12:08 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
They say Mary was born sinless. Not only is that not mentioned in the Bible, it is directly contradicted by the Bible.
Do you happen to have a reference for that?

Thanks.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-21-2005, 12:37 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: -World Forum (Int'l)-
Posts: 712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
In looking up the basis for the belief that Mary ascended bodily into heaven, I've been able to trace it back to 5th Century sources, but I haven't been able to find a connection between those and the bible. Does anyone know of any justification, however remote and strained the connection may be, between this infallible dogma of the Catholic church and the scriptures?
I'm not a Catholic, I don't believe in the Catholic figure of Mary as Jesus's mother in heaven.That is a teaching of the RCC, not of Jesus.I believe that Jesus is the only God in heaven.I have come to the point where I am compeletely unable to discern between Jesus and Father of Israel.The 2 parts of that trinity are so closely connected in my faith that I can't discern between the two, even by Spirit.


What makes you desire to find this connection? There doesn't seem to be any. IMO I'm going to open a skeptic thread.
Visionary7 is offline  
Old 04-21-2005, 12:39 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: -World Forum (Int'l)-
Posts: 712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
Do you happen to have a reference for that?

Thanks.

Matthew 1:18-25 18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.

I presume the Holy Spirit made Mary sinless by birth of Christ.Nothing sinful can come from the Holy Spirit. IMO
Visionary7 is offline  
Old 04-21-2005, 05:15 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Visionary7
Matthew 1:18-25 18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.

I presume the Holy Spirit made Mary sinless by birth of Christ.Nothing sinful can come from the Holy Spirit. IMO
The concept of Mary being sinless is that she was born without original sin, like Jesus. Its known as the immaculate conception.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 04-21-2005, 05:20 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: .............
Posts: 2,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus55
Actually, I find the Trinity to be extremely supported by scripture. Just because you don't doesn't mean it isn't in there.
Which then reduces your claim to subjective opinion.
Evoken is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.