Peter Kirby

I have need of the following journal articles. Since I am not currently in the university, I have no easy way of obtaining them.

Those who are in a university library system, or who otherwise have access to digital archives of popular journals... please forward the PDF's of some of the articles below to... peterkirby -@- gmail.com.

I will be marking them off of the list in this thread as these PDF's come in.

If you also desire a copy of some particular article on this list, or the whole of what I can get digitally, please also email me and I will forward them to you also.

The articles are being used for a research project into the original ending of the Gospel of Mark. My article on the subject will be made available on the net in the future.

Once we know which of these articles are not available digitally, but only on paper, I will be slogging around for paper copies of the remaining articles.

thanks,
Peter Kirby

The Expositor

Bacon, B. W. “Again the Authorship of the Last Verses of Mark.”Exp 6.12 (1905) 401–3.

Conybeare, F. C. “Aristion, the Author of the Last Twelve Verses of Mark.”Exp 4.8 (1893) 241–3. — “On the Last Twelve Verses of St. Mark’ Gospel.”Exp 5.2 (1895) 401–1.

Goodspeed, E. J. “The Original Conclusion of Mark.”Exp 45 (1919) 155–0.

Taylor, C. “Some Early Evidence for the Twelve Verses St. Mark 16,9–0.”Exp 4.8 (1893) 71–0.

Zahn, T., and Resch, A. “The Authorship of the Last Verses of Mark.”Exp 4.10 (1894) 219–2.

Expository Times

Dunn, J. W. E. “The Text of Mark 16 in the English Bible.”ExpTim 83 (1971–2) 311–2.

Mitton, C. L. “Some Further Studies in St. Mark’ Gospel.”ExpTim 87 (1975–6) 297–01.

Schearer, W. C. “The Last Twelve Verses of St. Mark’ Gospel.”ExpTim 5 (1893) 227–8.

Journal of Theological Studies

Birdsall, J. N. Review of The Last Twelve Verses of Mark, by W. R. Farmer. JTS n.s. 26 (1975) 151–0.

Creed, J. M. “The Conclusion of the Gospel according to Saint Mark.”JTS o.s. 31 (1929–0) 175–0.

Horst, P. W. van der. “Can a Book End with γaρ? A Note on Mark xvi.8.”JTS n.s. 23 (1972) 121–4.

Katz, P. “The Early Christians’Use of Codices instead of Rolls.”JTS n.s. 44 (1945) 63–9.

Kenyon, F. G. “Papyrus Rolls and the Ending of St. Mark.”JTS n.s. 40 (1939) 56–7.

Ottley, R. R. “ἐu966 οu946 οu8166 νu964 ογu940 ρ, Mark xvi 8.”JTS o.s. 27 (1926) 407–.

Roberts, C. H. “The Ancient Book and the Ending of St. Mark.”JTS o.s. 40 (1939) 253–7.

Turner, C. H. “Did Codex Vercellensis (a) Contain the Last Twelve Verses of St Mark?”JTS o.s. 29 (1927–8) 16–8.

Journal of Biblical Literature

Boomershine, T. E., and Bartholomew, G. L. “The Narrative Technique of Mark 16:8.”JBL 100 (1981) 213–3.

Cadbury, H. J. “Mark 16:8.”JBL 46 (1927) 344–0.

Colwell, E. C. “Mark 16:9–0 in the Armenian Version.”JBL 56 (1937) 369–6.

Harris, J. R. “On the Alternative Ending of St. Mark’ Gospel.”JBL 12 (1893) 96–03.

Kevin, R. O. “The Lost Ending of the Gospel according to Mark: A Criticism and a Reconstruction.”JBL 45 (1926) 81–03.

New Testament Studies

Trompf, G. W. “The First Resurrection Appearance and the Ending of Mark’s Gospel.”NTS 18 (1971–2) 308–0.

Evangelical Quarterly

Bruce, F. F. “The End of the Second Gospel.”EvQ 17 (1945) 169–1.

Zwemer, S. M. “The Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel of Mark.”EvQ 17 (1945) 13–3.

Catholic Biblical Quarterly

Bruns, J. E. “ Note on Mk 16,9–0.”CBQ 9 (1947) 358–9.

Reedy, C. J. “Mk 8:31–1:10 and the Gospel Ending: A Redactional Study.”CBQ 34 (1972) 188–7.

Novum Testamentum

Kilpatrick, G. D. “Some Thoughts on Modern Textual Criticism and the Synoptic Gospels.”NovT 19 (1977) 275–2 (repr. in G. D. Kilpatrick. The Principles and Practice of New Testament Textual Criticism: Collected Essays. Ed. J. K. Elliott. BETL 96. Leuven: Peeters and Leuven UP, 1990. 80–7).

TZ

Elliott, J. K. “The Text and Language of the Endings to Mark’ Gospel.”TZ 27 (1971) 255–2.

Harvard Theological Review

Knox, W. L. “The Ending of St. Mark’ Gospel.”HTR 35 (1942) 13–3.

Interpretation

Petersen, N. R. “When Is the End Not the End? Literary Reflections on the Ending of Mark’ Narrative.”Int 34 (1980) 151–6.

Hibbert Journal

Rördam, T. S. “What Was the Lost Ending of Mark’s Gospel?”HibJ 3 (1905) 769–0.

Theology

Scott Moncrieff, C. E. “The Lost Ending of Mark.”Theology 12 (1926) 218–0.

Journal of Evangelical Theological Studies

Thomas, J. C. “ Reconsideration of the Ending of Mark.”JETS 26 (1983) 407–9.

PS- that last number you see is supposed to be the number of pages in the item, but the digit before the – mark has been consistently lost, so ignore it.

Chris Weimer

Have you tried docexchange?

Peter Kirby

I was actually going to email you first, Chris, and have you do all that are available to you. :notworthy:

I may use docexchange when I figure out which ones are toughies.

Chris Weimer

I'll see what I can get and should have most sent to you by tomorrow. I should have JBL and NovT online - I'd have to go to the library to see if I can find some of the other articles, but then it'd cost me to make copies...

I'll see what I can do for you, otherwise hopefully other people with more access than I do at this point will have to help.

Peter Kirby

Below have been supplied. The rest remain at large at the time of writing.

The following items have been supplied (via JSTOR):

Boomershine, T. E., and Bartholomew, G. L. “The Narrative Technique of Mark 16:8.”JBL 100 (1981) 213–3.

Cadbury, H. J. “Mark 16:8.”JBL 46 (1927) 344–0.

Knox, W. L. “The Ending of St. Mark’ Gospel.”HTR 35 (1942) 13–3.

Kevin, R. O. “The Lost Ending of the Gospel according to Mark: A Criticism and a Reconstruction.”JBL 45 (1926) 81–03.

And I have gotten, for free, this item not in the bibliography:

Enslin, Morton S. "ephobounto gar, Mark 16:8'". JBL 46 (1927), pp. 62-68.

Thanks go out to Dr. Gibson for these.

Thanks to Chris Weimer for sending these.

Kilpatrick, G. D. “Some Thoughts on Modern Textual Criticism and the Synoptic Gospels.”NovT 19 (1977) 275–2 (repr. in G. D. Kilpatrick. The Principles and Practice of New Testament Textual Criticism: Collected Essays. Ed. J. K. Elliott. BETL 96. Leuven: Peeters and Leuven UP, 1990. 80–7).

Colwell, E. C. “Mark 16:9–0 in the Armenian Version.”JBL 56 (1937) 369–6.

Harris, J. R. “On the Alternative Ending of St. Mark’ Gospel.”JBL 12 (1893) 96–03.

Another person (Apikorus) supplied these:

Dunn, J. W. E. “The Text of Mark 16 in the English Bible.”ExpTim 83 (1971–2) 311–2.

Mitton, C. L. “Some Further Studies in St. Mark’ Gospel.”ExpTim 87 (1975–6) 297–01.

Schearer, W. C. “The Last Twelve Verses of St. Mark’ Gospel.”ExpTim 5 (1893) 227–8.

Petersen, N. R. “When Is the End Not the End? Literary Reflections on the Ending of Mark’ Narrative.”Int 34 (1980) 151–6.

Birdsall, J. N. Review of The Last Twelve Verses of Mark, by W. R. Farmer. JTS n.s. 26 (1975) 151–0.

Creed, J. M. “The Conclusion of the Gospel according to Saint Mark.”JTS o.s. 31 (1929–0) 175–0.

Horst, P. W. van der. “Can a Book End with γaρ? A Note on Mark xvi.8.”JTS n.s. 23 (1972) 121–4.

Katz, P. “The Early Christians’Use of Codices instead of Rolls.”JTS n.s. 44 (1945) 63–9.

Kenyon, F. G. “Papyrus Rolls and the Ending of St. Mark.”JTS n.s. 40 (1939) 56–7.

Ottley, R. R. “ἐu966 οu946 οu8166 νu964 ογu940 ρ, Mark xvi 8.”JTS o.s. 27 (1926) 407–.

Roberts, C. H. “The Ancient Book and the Ending of St. Mark.”JTS o.s. 40 (1939) 253–7.

Turner, C. H. “Did Codex Vercellensis (a) Contain the Last Twelve Verses of St Mark?”JTS o.s. 29 (1927–8) 16–8.

Bruns, J. E. “ Note on Mk 16,9–0.”CBQ 9 (1947) 358–9.

Reedy, C. J. “Mk 8:31–1:10 and the Gospel Ending: A Redactional Study.”CBQ 34 (1972) 188–7.

I now have all the JBL articles requested, as well as those from HTR and NovT.

The ExpTim articles are also received complete. Also all the JTS articles, the two CBQ articles, and the Interpretation article.

I will make another post with a positive statement of what's left. Thanks again to Apikorus, Chris, and Jeffrey!

Apikorus

Peter, check your email.

Peter Kirby

The following articles are at large still, at the time of writing.

Those which do not seem to be available electronically, I will be trying to track down and photocopy at the Claremont school either tomorrow or next week sometime.

Thanks again to everyone who supplied articles, or will or wants to, and to the board for indulging this use of the platform.

The Expositor

Bacon, B. W. “Again the Authorship of the Last Verses of Mark.”Exp 6.12 (1905) 401–3.

Conybeare, F. C. “Aristion, the Author of the Last Twelve Verses of Mark.”Exp 4.8 (1893) 241–3. — “On the Last Twelve Verses of St. Mark’ Gospel.”Exp 5.2 (1895) 401–1.

Goodspeed, E. J. “The Original Conclusion of Mark.”Exp 45 (1919) 155–0.

Taylor, C. “Some Early Evidence for the Twelve Verses St. Mark 16,9–0.”Exp 4.8 (1893) 71–0.

Zahn, T., and Resch, A. “The Authorship of the Last Verses of Mark.”Exp 4.10 (1894) 219–2.

New Testament Studies

Trompf, G. W. “The First Resurrection Appearance and the Ending of Mark’s Gospel.”NTS 18 (1971–2) 308–0.

Evangelical Quarterly

Bruce, F. F. “The End of the Second Gospel.”EvQ 17 (1945) 169–1.

Zwemer, S. M. “The Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel of Mark.”EvQ 17 (1945) 13–3.

TZ

Elliott, J. K. “The Text and Language of the Endings to Mark’ Gospel.”TZ 27 (1971) 255–2.

Hibbert Journal

Rördam, T. S. “What Was the Lost Ending of Mark’s Gospel?”HibJ 3 (1905) 769–0.

Theology

Scott Moncrieff, C. E. “The Lost Ending of Mark.”Theology 12 (1926) 218–0.

Journal of Evangelical Theological Studies

Thomas, J. C. “ Reconsideration of the Ending of Mark.”JETS 26 (1983) 407–9.