FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2006, 12:59 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Space Station 33
Posts: 2,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life
Let us say Jesus never performed any miracles. Does it seem logical to you that people would believe him as the Messiah and follow him?

Cmon atheists, you know darn well if someone was claiming to be the Messiah in the first century, and was "healing the sick" and the sick didn't get healed, everyone would laugh at him and not believe him!

This did not happen atheists. People flocked to him and followed him so logic dictates he must have performed the miracles.

Would you not laugh at soemone today who couldn't do a miracle?

If they did do the miracle, would you not tell others about his wondrous powers?

How did Jesus gain so many followers by faking his raising people from the dead?
Evidently few in his home town fell for his bullshit...

Mark says:
6:4 But Jesus, said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, but in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house.
6:5 And he could there do no mighty work, save that he laid his hands upon a few sick folk, and healed them.
6:6 And he marvelled because of their unbelief. And he went round about the villages, teaching.

Just maybe they were on to his game, having known him for awhile... :wave:
xaxxat is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 01:03 PM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 13,161
Default

Everything you say about Christianity, HL, cab be applied to many other religions which you reject.
Splarnst is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 02:10 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

So really, as Tacitus claims, Augustus did heal people too. And heck, even Asclepius raised people from the dead. We are to believe that he really did such things?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 02:40 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the impenetrable fortress of the bubbleheads
Posts: 1,308
Default

Lets assume the sky is blue while we're at it.
Jabu Khan is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 02:49 PM   #25
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 118
Default

The difference between the christian bibles and history books is theres no proof of the bible being true and most history books can be proven true, I guess.
leviathanken is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 03:10 PM   #26
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 61
Default

I basically agree with everyone here.

The only thing for me, is the fact that it all seems to have happend so recently and that it actually took off.

Look at David Koresh, less than 30 years after his death and 99% of people (that have actually heard of him) think he was nut case. Jesus, whatever he did, made an impact.

He also lived very close to the time of his followers, and the things he did were set in the present. Look at Hubbard, the wacky stuff he was "teaching", is set way back in the past, therefore gains some "credibility", because its impossible to prove it wrong.*

The Egyptian and Roman Gods etc were set in the past and were mythical. Jesus lived so close to his followers and it all seemed to develop so quickly.

*Note: I dont consider the ideas of Scientology at all credible. :P
Chunk is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 03:15 PM   #27
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Look at David Koresh, less than 30 years after his death and 99% of people (that have actually heard of him) think he was nut case.
The same was true of Jesus 30 years after his death.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 03:55 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moorhead, MN, USA
Posts: 567
Default

I consider Jesus the leader of a dissident Jewish sect who simply wanted to keep his fellow Jews from distroying themselves from revolting violently against Roman rule (and the realization of this probably hit him so hard that he probably though the idea was divine relavation), and so preached that the Kingdom of God wasn't of this world, and then intentionally pissed of the Jewish high preisthood so he would become a martyr to make his otherworldly message clear (unfortunately it didn't work, as the Jews revolted and Jerusalem got razed by the Romans). When his sect spread to the Hellenized parts of the Roman Empire his message got contaminated with the beliefs of other eastern cults, such as Mithraism, leading to the virgin birth and ressurection stories.
Odin2006 is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 04:32 PM   #29
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,620
Default

I also tend to believe that here was some sort of historical Jesus - if only on the grounds that most myths I've come across seem to have got some sort of reality behind the myth, like King Arthur, Troy, even the flood, what with the flooding of the Black Sea area somewhat ctastrophically.

I tend to speculate that Jesus was a Jewish nationalist, a member of of a Jewish messanaic sect, with some sort of claim to be a pretender to the Jewish throne.

When I say that there is reality behind the myth of the Trojan Wars, I don't mean to imply that I have any credence that the supernatural events described in Homer had any reality.

Nor credence of supernatural claims in the Bible.

But, back to my speculation. I see it as plausible, but there are lots of people here, in this forum, much better informed about middle eastern history, culture etc than I am. Perhaps they know something I don't, that makes it implausible.

If so, I'd like to know about it, so that I can readjust my working hypotheses.

David B (hopes for comment from the experts)
David B is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 10:02 PM   #30
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life
We need to throw out hsitory books too because you can't read about stuff in a history book and assume that stuff happened just because you read it in a history book.
None of my history books claim anyone performed any miracles. If they did I would throw them out.

But, more to the point all history is at least somewhat questionable, it's just that some of it is more questionable than others. Healing the sick is a gimme, anyone can do that depending on the illness, it's in the mind of the believer.

Walking on water would be a real trick, not to mention rising from the dead. Seriously, if you read that in tommorows's newspaper and it said "thousands witnessed it", would you think "JC's back!" or would you think "what a neat trick! Wonder how he did that?" I saw a guy climb through a closed window without breaking it on "MindFreak", but I didn't run off to join his religion.
Skeptical is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:38 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.