FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Evolution/Creation
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-01-2005, 02:15 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 2,103
Default is there a REASON for so much glu?

is there a REASON that glucose, mannose, and galactose are so damn popular in glycoproteins? they're everywhere!

-Pf

edited to add: my guess is just that they're structurally similar (being epimers and all...) and aldohexoses. so they're stable and there can be plenty of branching going on.
Phishfood is offline  
Old 03-01-2005, 02:22 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 6,004
Default

Errr - the Designer made it that way :Cheeky:

Why are (almost) all naturally occuring amino acids in the L configuration?
BioBeing is offline  
Old 03-02-2005, 09:25 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 2,103
Default

well i guess no one knows
Phishfood is offline  
Old 03-02-2005, 09:58 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
Default

If I had to guess, I'd say it's because they're common sugars, and since they're all 6 membered rings, they can form ordered structures when polymerized. (Basically, you can use a bunch of hexagons to make whatever shape you want.) Since glycoproteins serve basically as recognition "keys", shape is important.

Of course, those three sugars are not the only ones found in glycoproteins.

theyeti
theyeti is offline  
Old 03-02-2005, 11:53 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 6,004
Default

Lets ask our resident biologists over in E/C.

BioBeing,
S&S Mod
BioBeing is offline  
Old 03-02-2005, 04:53 PM   #6
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Default

Glucose, at least, is probably common because of energetics: all of its bulky groups (hydroxyls and the hydroxymethyl) are in equatorial positions in its normal conformation. And too, there are only eight possible aldohexoses to pick from, so three is a decent number of them to be the "most common."

I may have to get out a pencil and go draw a bunch of cyclohexanes in the chair conformation now. And I apologize to all you non-chemists for our jargon - half an hour at a blackboard with some chalk, and I could explain that stuff to you, but this medium is a little more difficult to do interactive 3-D drawings on.
Coragyps is offline  
Old 03-02-2005, 08:01 PM   #7
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Default

Well, I did go draw them.... do you think I should get a life?
Galactose and mannose only have one substituent axial and the rest equatorial, so they likely are the next most thermodynamically stable after glucose.
Coragyps is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.