FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Science Discussions
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-26-2005, 10:08 AM   #81
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BioBeing
So, if your theory is correct, when applied to YHWH it should give the same sort of triangle numbers, shouldn't it?
You apparently need to apply a different method to get the triangular numbers hidden in it:
http://homepage.virgin.net/vernon.je...enigma3.htm#H3 You have to ignore one of the letters, so it's not as clean.

The fact that they used a different method brings back my earlier question; if you hadn't got a unique number out of it with one method, would you have tried another method?

If you apply the exactly same method to YHWH you get 16 and 21, and I'm not clear what significance they have.
-RRH- is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 10:10 AM   #82
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 560
Default

Attention IIDB: GIVE IT UP. Pmarra's website is obviously 80% legit with The Man Upstairs.

According to the Gematriculator

http://www.logonomics.it/

is 80% Good and only 20% Evil

(results: http://homokaasu.org/gematriculator/)

I am afraid that despite all the fancy mathematics, Pmarra obviously has a direct line.

Of course I would have expected it to be 100% Good, but that's what the numbers say apparently.

-h.
hagiograph is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 10:12 AM   #83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pmarra
I am sorry
but I don't agree

it is not arbitrary to say that the number 136 is extremely rare

it is really scientific to say instead that the number 136 is extremely rare
While I am unable to follow all of the exciting mathematics here, I think I can see that the number 136 is exceedingly rare. In fact it is the ONLY number that equals 136 out an INFINITY of numbers.
hagiograph is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 10:53 AM   #84
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: France
Posts: 5,839
Default

Assassinations Foretold in Moby Dick!
French Prometheus is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 11:08 AM   #85
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,781
Default

Oh my... the writer of Moby Dick must surely have been divine.
GrandpaMithras is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 11:55 AM   #86
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Delft, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pmarra
it is really scientific to say instead that the number 136 is extremely rare
Bollocks. "extremely rare" is not a scientific term.

Consecutive triplets of triangular numbers that add up to another triangular number are NOT extremely rare in any mathematical sense. In fact, there are infinitely many of them - which means (in any meaningful mathematical sense) that they are as rare as, e.g., even numbers.

The first, second, and third triangular number add up to a triangular number.

Same is true for triangular numbers 8/9/10 (your case).

Same is true for triangular numbers 34/35/36.

Same is true for triangular numbers 131/132/133.

Same is true for triangular numbers 493/494/495.

Same is true for triangular numbers 1844/1845/1846.

Same is true for triangular numbers 6886/6887/6888.

Same is true for triangular numbers 25703/25704/25705.

Same is true for triangular numbers 95929, 95930, 95931.

Do you want me to go on? See for yourself: http://www.research.att.com/projects/OEIS?Anum=A082840
reddish is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 12:24 PM   #87
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RRH
Well, sure, in the sense that there's only one of them. But what particular significance does it have?

Now, if you had got 439, should I still be impressed, because it's the sum of three consecutive primes, a sum of nine consecutive primes, and is itself a prime. Is 439 more unique or less unique than 136?

sorry but I don't agree

the number 136 is rarer than a Mersenne prime

the Mersenne primes are very rare


A SPECIAL CLASS OF RARE PRIME NUMBERS CALLED MERSENNE PRIMES .

Mersenne prime
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenn...ersenne_primes

In mathematics, a Mersenne prime is a prime number that is one less than a power of two.

Mersenne primes have a close connection to perfect numbers, which are numbers that are equal to the sum of their proper divisors. Historically, the study of Mersenne primes was motivated by this connection; in the 4th century BC Euclid demonstrated that if M is a Mersenne prime then M(M+1)/2 is a perfect number. Two millennia later, in the 18th century, Euler proved that all even perfect numbers have this form. No odd perfect numbers are known, and it is suspected that none exists. It is currently unknown whether there is an infinite number of Mersenne primes.
Pmarra is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 12:46 PM   #88
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Delft, The Netherlands
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pmarra
the number 136 is rarer than a Mersenne prime
Seriously, you could read my message above and stop embarrassing yourself.
reddish is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 12:59 PM   #89
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 6,004
Default

Not only what reddish said, but 439 is not a Mersenne Prime any way, so that was something of a red herring.




Any word on pi yet?
BioBeing is offline  
Old 10-26-2005, 02:01 PM   #90
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 93
Default

Quote:
the number 136 is rarer than a Mersenne prime
I think this is the point I give up. It's like arguing with a recording - no matter what you say, it keeps on regardless.
Blackcat is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.