FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-12-2007, 05:36 PM   #691
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
You've been watching too much TV on The Skeptic Channel.
I didn't even know there was a Skeptic Channel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
Why don't you come to my church sometime and meet me? I'm a really normal guy with a really normal family and my church is full of really nice, normal people. You'd be amazed.
If your church is the only place you can be met, that doesn't sound very normal.
spamandham is offline  
Old 08-12-2007, 08:01 PM   #692
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,375
Default

OFF TOPIC POSTS ON WALT BROWN THREAD ...
Quote:
ericmurphy
Veteran User

Join Date: March 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 622

Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
Mung Bean ... You should direct your ridicule at CM, not me. He is the confused one on Lake Suigetsu. I understand volcanic markers just fine. And this is not a debate ... It's a discussion ... Also, there is no need to concern yourself with the rules because you are not being asked to do a call.

Dave, you had no fucking idea what volcanism had to do with Lake Suigetsu, and ridiculed people for even bringing it up. You may understand volcanic markers now, but you sure as hell didn't at the time, and I doubt you understand them now, or you wouldn't be so completely in the weeds when it comes to radiocarbon calibration techniques, despite the exhaustive attempts of at least a dozen people to educate you.

CM is perfectly clear and perfectly unconfused on lake Suigetsu. You can't figure it out at all. Why do you think you got like two votes out of almost 150?
I didn't read anything about volcanism in the Lake Suigetsu paper. I did read about the Kanbun earthquake. That's why I've been scratching my head for several weeks now hearing people talk about volcanism and coral and tree rings and how they relate to Lake Suigetsu.

Quote:
Occam's Aftershave
User

Join Date: June 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA.
Posts: 226

Default
And for completeness, I'll point out that it has now been 429 straight days of AFDave cowardly avoiding the questions

Why do all the independent C14 cal curves cross-correlate so closely, none show a 100X carbon spike at 4500 years ago, and all show ages well older than 10,000 years?
Because everyone has agreed to certain faulty assumptions. This is a recording.
Dave Hawkins is offline  
Old 08-12-2007, 08:19 PM   #693
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
OFF TOPIC POSTS ON WALT BROWN THREAD ...
Quote:
ericmurphy
Veteran User

Join Date: March 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 622

Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
Mung Bean ... You should direct your ridicule at CM, not me. He is the confused one on Lake Suigetsu. I understand volcanic markers just fine. And this is not a debate ... It's a discussion ... Also, there is no need to concern yourself with the rules because you are not being asked to do a call.

Dave, you had no fucking idea what volcanism had to do with Lake Suigetsu, and ridiculed people for even bringing it up. You may understand volcanic markers now, but you sure as hell didn't at the time, and I doubt you understand them now, or you wouldn't be so completely in the weeds when it comes to radiocarbon calibration techniques, despite the exhaustive attempts of at least a dozen people to educate you.

CM is perfectly clear and perfectly unconfused on lake Suigetsu. You can't figure it out at all. Why do you think you got like two votes out of almost 150?
I didn't read anything about volcanism in the Lake Suigetsu paper. I did read about the Kanbun earthquake. That's why I've been scratching my head for several weeks now hearing people talk about volcanism and coral and tree rings and how they relate to Lake Suigetsu.
Dave, are you really that much of an idiot, or do you just play one on the web?

Quote:
Quote:
Occam's Aftershave
User

Join Date: June 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA.
Posts: 226

Default
And for completeness, I'll point out that it has now been 429 straight days of AFDave cowardly avoiding the questions

Why do all the independent C14 cal curves cross-correlate so closely, none show a 100X carbon spike at 4500 years ago, and all show ages well older than 10,000 years?
Because everyone has agreed to certain faulty assumptions. This is a recording.
And of course you could never tell us what those assumptions are, or how you determined they are faulty.

*BZZZZZT* Wrong answer Dave. Your cowardly avoidance record is still 429 days and counting.
Occam's Aftershave is offline  
Old 08-12-2007, 08:54 PM   #694
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
OFF TOPIC POSTS ON WALT BROWN THREAD ...
Quote:
ericmurphy
Veteran User

Join Date: March 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 622

Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by afdave View Post
Mung Bean ... You should direct your ridicule at CM, not me. He is the confused one on Lake Suigetsu. I understand volcanic markers just fine. And this is not a debate ... It's a discussion ... Also, there is no need to concern yourself with the rules because you are not being asked to do a call.

Dave, you had no fucking idea what volcanism had to do with Lake Suigetsu, and ridiculed people for even bringing it up. You may understand volcanic markers now, but you sure as hell didn't at the time, and I doubt you understand them now, or you wouldn't be so completely in the weeds when it comes to radiocarbon calibration techniques, despite the exhaustive attempts of at least a dozen people to educate you.

CM is perfectly clear and perfectly unconfused on lake Suigetsu. You can't figure it out at all. Why do you think you got like two votes out of almost 150?
I didn't read anything about volcanism in the Lake Suigetsu paper. I did read about the Kanbun earthquake. That's why I've been scratching my head for several weeks now hearing people talk about volcanism and coral and tree rings and how they relate to Lake Suigetsu.

Quote:
Occam's Aftershave
User

Join Date: June 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA.
Posts: 226

Default
And for completeness, I'll point out that it has now been 429 straight days of AFDave cowardly avoiding the questions

Why do all the independent C14 cal curves cross-correlate so closely, none show a 100X carbon spike at 4500 years ago, and all show ages well older than 10,000 years?
Because everyone has agreed to certain faulty assumptions. This is a recording.
No, actually it's not. You change this story every time you tell it. First the scientists are engaged in fraud; then they're stupid; then they're mistaken; and now they're all engaged in conspiracy again.

The data has not changed, Dave. Lake Suigetsu demonstrates that most of Genesis is bunk. Garbage. Crap. Mythology at best.

I, a devout Christian with a damn sight better understanding of the Bible than you will ever possess, tell you so.

What's more, I demonstrated to the world, or the readership here at any event, that you simply don't understand calibration curves.

Because you don't have a convenient pseudo-scientific creationist nonsense site to quote from, no doubt.

Tell me, Dave: do you honestly think that anyone is fooled by your evasions and illogical arguments? Anyone?

Perhaps you should consider learning some science and stop making Christians look like idiots. Because you're doing a damn good job of making any actual attempt at conversion impossible.

<edit>
Constant Mews is offline  
Old 08-12-2007, 08:55 PM   #695
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,395
Default

Oh, and Dave? I spoke to my solicitor. He has contacted Dr. Leakey. Perhaps you'll be lucky and the good doctor will consider you a harmless crank.
Constant Mews is offline  
Old 08-13-2007, 03:16 AM   #696
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,057
Default

Quote:
No, actually it's not. You change this story every time you tell it. First the scientists are engaged in fraud; then they're stupid; then they're mistaken; and now they're all engaged in conspiracy again.
QFT, dave. QFT.

When will you admit the truth? When will you find the guts to admit what you really believe in?

You are not stupid, dave. You KNOW that the ONLY way entirely DIFFERENT methods, dealing with entirely DIFFERENT natural laws and procedures, can give results that are WRONG supposedly, but are in AMAZING CONSILLIENCE, pointing to an old age for the Earth, is that:

A. The data is FABRICATED (all scientists are frauds), or

B. The data is NOT WRONG AFTER ALL (the Earth IS old).

These are your options, dave. A Great Global Evil Atheist Scientific Conspiracy,

or Young Earth Creationism being WRONG.

Now, we all know which one you believe in. We are just wondering when you will finally find the drawers to come out and say it, instead of repeating your evasions like a broken record.
Faid is offline  
Old 08-13-2007, 09:03 AM   #697
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 167
Default

This thread (and related ones) is an amazing study in the effects of fundamentalism. I applaud the efforts here to inject reality into this poor guy's head, but it seems pointless. I have coined a term to describe this affliction. It is to me "reality terrorism." It is similar to radical islam though thankfully in this case it seems to manifest itself differently. The effort required to ignore and explain away all reality in order to maintain the biblical illusion must be tremendous. Governments love these people because of how readily they are controlled. They vote and they're dangerous. I sometimes find humor in reading this but more than anything it makes me sad that there are so many people like this.
driver8 is offline  
Old 08-13-2007, 09:20 AM   #698
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by driver8 View Post
This thread (and related ones) is an amazing study in the effects of fundamentalism. I applaud the efforts here to inject reality into this poor guy's head, but it seems pointless. I have coined a term to describe this affliction. It is to me "reality terrorism." It is similar to radical islam though thankfully in this case it seems to manifest itself differently. The effort required to ignore and explain away all reality in order to maintain the biblical illusion must be tremendous. Governments love these people because of how readily they are controlled. They vote and they're dangerous. I sometimes find humor in reading this but more than anything it makes me sad that there are so many people like this.
Sadly, I think you are right. Dave demonstrates quite clearly how limited education of fundamentalists actually is.
Constant Mews is offline  
Old 08-13-2007, 10:49 AM   #699
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Constant Mews View Post
demonstrates quite clearly how limited education of fundamentalists actually is.
And yet they can vote and breed.
stp2007 is offline  
Old 08-13-2007, 11:09 AM   #700
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stp2007 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Constant Mews View Post
demonstrates quite clearly how limited education of fundamentalists actually is.
And yet they can vote and breed.
It's quite clear that when Jefferson spoke of all men being equal, he was not referring to the gifts they were given by nature, but rather to some equivalence of value based on - for lack of a better term - soul; some quality endowed them independent of their value to society. In the creationist case, what is more disturbing is their inability to continue to learn; to continue to educate themselves.
Constant Mews is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:30 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.